Indian Journal of Positive Psychology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study of Nature Connectedness and Psychological W ell-being among Adults


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur , Rajasthan, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Individuals who belong to the natural world consider themselves as part natural word and feel to connect with environment. Wilson, who coined the term biophilia almost 20 years ago, provided a philosophical framework for the concept of being connected to nature. Biophilia is described as an individual's innate emotional connection to other living plants and animals. Individual well-being is also nourished by exposure to plants and flowers. Nature Connectedness hypothesis explained that linked between people and natural world has a tangible effect on their physical and mental well-being and behavior. Many researcher done their work on related constructs include ecological identity (Naess, 1973); explained ecological identity , while the concept if nature relatedness (Nisbet, 2009); and inclusion with nature (Schultz, 2002); described by (Nisbet, 2009); and (Schultz, 2002) respectively , all of which also take into account the extent to which someone experiences himself or herself as a part of natural community of life. People who have more connected and linked with nature consider themselves as a part of the wider natural world and society . In the current research, we explained difference between nature connectedness and psychological well-being between male and female by applied Connectedness to nature scale (Mayer & Frantz, 2004) and psychological well-being Scale by (Ryff, 1989) on adults (N=70). The result showed the significant difference between the male and female in connectedness to nature and psychological well-being that connection to nature lead the difference in psychology well-being among adults.

Keywords

nature connectedness, eudaimonic, psychological well-being
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationship as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.

  • Berenguer, J. (2007). He effect of empathy in pro environmental attitudes and behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292937.

  • Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health,10(1), 456.

  • Cialdini, R. B. 1997. Professionally responsible communication with the public: Giving psychology a way. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 675- 683.

  • Cheng, J., & Monroe, M. (2012) Connection to nature: Children's affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31-49. doi:10.1177/001391651 0385082.

  • Cialdini, R. B. 1997. Professionally responsible communication with the public: Giving psychology a way. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 675-683.

  • Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7), 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752.

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71-75.

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., KimPrieto, C., Choi, D.W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85-107). Oxford University Press.

  • Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474- 493.

  • Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202. doi: 10.1177/00139169921972056

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121-140. Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). The nature and importance of positive mental health in America's adolescents. In R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner, and M. J.Furlong (Eds.),

  • Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 9-23). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Leary, M.R., Tipsord, J.M., & Tate, E.B. (2008). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one's sense of self. In H. A. Wayment and J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 137–147). American Psychological Association. Https://doi.org/10.1037/11771-013

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001

  • Mayer, F.S., Frantz, C.M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2008). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. doi:10.1177/0013916508319745

  • Naess, A. (January 1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16(14), 95-100. Doi:10.1080/00201747308601682

  • Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Luce, C., Sagarin, B. J., & Lewis, B. P. (1997). Does empathy lead to anything more than superficial helping? Comment on Batson, et al. (1997). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 510-516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.510

  • Nisbet, E. K. L., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior.Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740. doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748

  • Perkins, K.M., Munguia, N., Moure-Eraso, R., Delakowitz, B., Giannetti, B.F., Liu, G.Y., Nurunnabi, M., Will, M., & Velazquez, L. (2008). International perspectives on the pedagogy of climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.296

  • Roszak, T. (1995). Where psyche meets Gaia. In T. Roszak, M. E. Gomes, and A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 156–171). San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069- 1081.

  • Saroglou, V., & Muñoz-García, A. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific study of Religion, 47, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00393.

  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck and P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61e-78). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 38, 227-242.

  • Vining, J., & Merrick, S.M. (2008). The influence of proximity to a national forest on emotions and fire-management decisions. Environmental Management, 41, 155-167.

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678.

  • Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A., & Ryan, R. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1315-1329.

  • Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0- 674-074424


Abstract Views: 205

PDF Views: 0




  • Study of Nature Connectedness and Psychological W ell-being among Adults

Abstract Views: 205  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vishva Choudhary
Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur , Rajasthan, India
Bharti Sharma
Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur , Rajasthan, India

Abstract


Individuals who belong to the natural world consider themselves as part natural word and feel to connect with environment. Wilson, who coined the term biophilia almost 20 years ago, provided a philosophical framework for the concept of being connected to nature. Biophilia is described as an individual's innate emotional connection to other living plants and animals. Individual well-being is also nourished by exposure to plants and flowers. Nature Connectedness hypothesis explained that linked between people and natural world has a tangible effect on their physical and mental well-being and behavior. Many researcher done their work on related constructs include ecological identity (Naess, 1973); explained ecological identity , while the concept if nature relatedness (Nisbet, 2009); and inclusion with nature (Schultz, 2002); described by (Nisbet, 2009); and (Schultz, 2002) respectively , all of which also take into account the extent to which someone experiences himself or herself as a part of natural community of life. People who have more connected and linked with nature consider themselves as a part of the wider natural world and society . In the current research, we explained difference between nature connectedness and psychological well-being between male and female by applied Connectedness to nature scale (Mayer & Frantz, 2004) and psychological well-being Scale by (Ryff, 1989) on adults (N=70). The result showed the significant difference between the male and female in connectedness to nature and psychological well-being that connection to nature lead the difference in psychology well-being among adults.

Keywords


nature connectedness, eudaimonic, psychological well-being

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2022%2Fv13i2%2F215364