Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development and Standardisation of Anugraha-Loyola Gratitude Scale (ALGS-48)


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Anugraha Institute of Social Sciences, (Affiliated to MKU, Madurai) Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Ph.D., Research Supervisor, Head of the Department of Psychology, Anugraha Institute of Social Sciences Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Gratitude is one's “general tendency to recognize and respond with grateful emotion to other people's benevolence” (McCullough, Emmons, & Tsang, 2002, p. 2). It is considered a treasure, and all religions, cultures, and moral teachings have asserted the value and benefits of gratitude for nurturing human relations. This study aims at developing a tool to measure the level of gratitude in common people in the age group of 20-60. The constructed and validated Anugraha-Loyola Gratitude Scale (ALGS-48) consists of 48 items with six dimensions based on general, relational, emotional, spiritual, expressive, and ecological aspects. The suitability of the items was found in the first phase by the Cronbach Alpha test based on the pilot study (N = 160). The internal consistency, validity, reliability, and test-retest reliability of ALGS-48 were established based on the study conducted on a larger sample (N = 1116). The concurrent validity of the ALGS-48 scale was correlated with Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), Gratitude Questionnaire-Six-Item Form (GQ-6), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The results showed a positive correlation between OHQ and GQ-6 while BAI had a negative correlation. The applicability, limitations, and norms for the interpretation of ALGS-48 are discussed in detail. The results of this study indicate that the ALGS-48 possesses adequate psychometric qualities to measure gratitude among the commoners in the Indian context

Keywords

gratitude, scale construction and validation, dimensions of gratitude, well-being
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adler, M. G., & Fagley, N. S. (2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 73, 79-114.
  • Algoe, S., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8, 425-429 American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1338- 1343.
  • Anas, M., Husain, A., Khan, S. M., & Aijaz, A. (2016). Development and Standardization of the gratitude scale. Journal of Educational Health and Community Psychology, 5(3), 1-14.
  • Beck, A.T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R.A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.
  • Billingsley, S., Lim, M., Caron, J., Harris, A., & Canada, R. (2005). Historical overview of criteria for marital and family success. Family Therapy, 32, 1-14
  • Bono, G., Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M E. (2004). Gratitude in practice and the practice of gratitude. In P. A. Linley and S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice. New Jersey, Canada: John Wiley publication
  • Carr, A. (2011). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths (2nd Ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2008). Positive psychological well-being and morality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(7), 741-756. https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=18725425 doi:10.1097/ PSY.0b013e31818105ba
  • Coolican, H. (2014). Research methods and statistics in psychology. Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd, ISBN: 9780340812587
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approach. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Davis, D. E., Choe, E., Meyers, J., Wade, N., Varjas, K., Gifford, A., Worthington, E. L. (2015). Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 20-31. https://doi.Org/10.1037/cou0000 107
  • Deng, Y., Xiang, R., Yijie, Z., li, Y., Yu, S., & Liu, X. (2019). Counting blessings and sharing gratitude in a Chinese prisoner sample: Effects of gratitude-based interventions on subjective well-being and aggression. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14, 303-311. 10.1080/17439760.2018.1460687
  • Carr, A. (2011). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths (2nd Ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Beck, A.T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R.A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.
  • Edwards, A. L. (1969). Techniques of attitude scale construction, Vakils. Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd., Bombay.
  • Emmons, R. A., & Crumpler, C. A. (2000). Gratitude as a human strength: Appraising the evidence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.56
  • Emmons, R. A., & Kneezel, T. T. (2005). Giving thanks: Spiritual and religious correlates of gratitude. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 24(2), 140-148
  • .Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-389
  • Emmons, R. A., McCullough, M. E., & Tsang, J. (2003). The measurement of gratitude. In S. Lopez and C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology assessment (pp. 327-341). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Emmons, R. A., Bono, G., Huebner, E. S., & Watkins, P. (2011). Measuring gratitude in youth: Assessing the psychometric properties of adult gratitude scales in children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311- 324. doi:10.1037/a0021590
  • Ghalesefidi, M.J., Maghsoudi, J., & Pouragha, B. (2019). Effectiveness of gratitude on psychological well-being and quality of life among hospitalized substance abuse patients. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 16(2), em128. https://doi.org/1 0.293 33/ejgm/94091
  • Greeff, A.P., & Le Roux, C.M. (1999). Parents' and adolescents' perceptions of a strong family. Psychological Reports, 84, 1219-1224.
  • Harzing, A. W. (2005). Does the use of English-language questionnaires in crossnational research obscure national differences? International Journal of Cross- Cultural Management, 5(2), 213-224.
  • Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 819-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.101 6/S0742-051X(01)00033-6
  • Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The oxford happiness questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073-1082.
  • John, O. P., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Measurement, scale construction, and reliability. In H.T. Reis and C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339-369). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stoeckel, M., Weissbrod, C., & Ahrens, A. (2014). The adolescent response to parental illness: The influence of dispositional gratitude. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1501-1509. Advance online publication. Doi:10.1007/s10826-014- 9955-y
  • Toepfer, S., & Walker, K. (2009). Letters of gratitude: Improving well-being through expressive writing. Journal of Writing Research. 1, 181-198. 10.17239/jowr- 2009.01.03.1
  • Streiner, D.L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99-103. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18. PMID: 12584072 Wilder, T. (2014). The Cabala and the woman of Andros [HarperCollins e-book version].
  • Wood, A.M., Maltby, J., Stewart, N., & Joseph, S. (2007). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. ELSEVIER. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 619-630. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com, https://doi.org /10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.028
  • Petrocchi, N., & Couyoumdjian, A. (2016). The impact of gratitude on depression and anxiety: The mediating role of criticizing, attacking, and reassuring the self. Self and Identity, 15, 191-205. Doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1095794
  • Schwartzberg, L. (2011). Nature beauty. Gratitude. [Video File] Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/louie_schwartzberg_nature_beauty_gratitude/details
  • Morgan, B., Gulliford, L., & Carr, D. (2015). Educating gratitude: Some conceptual and moral misgivings. Journal of Moral Education, 44(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.10 80/03057240.2014.1002461
  • Streiner, D., & Norman, G. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112-127. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112
  • Teigen, K. H. (1997). Luck, envy, and gratitude: It could have been different. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 313–323. Doi:10.1111/1467-9450.
  • Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. (2012) The foreign-language effect: Thinking 00041 in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23(6), 661-668. DOI, 10.1177/0956797611432178
  • Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, T., & Kolts, R. L. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31, 431-451. https://doi.org/10.2224/ sbp.2003.31.5.431
  • Rash, J.A., Matsuba, M.K., & Prkachin, K.M. (2011). Gratitude and well‐being: Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention? Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3, 350-369. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011. 01058. x. Retrieved from https://www.harpercollins.com
  • Van de Creek, L., Janus, M. D., Pennebaker, J. W., & Binau, B. (2002). Praying about difficult experiences as self-disclosure to God. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12(1), 29-39.
  • Watkins, P. C. (2014). Gratitude and the good life. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94- 007-7253-3
  • Sansone, R.A., & Sansone, L.A. (2010). Gratitude and well-being. Psychiatry, 7(11), 18-22.
  • Kerr, S. L., O'Donovan, A., & Pepping, C. A. (2015). Can gratitude and kindness interventions enhance well-being in a clinical sample? Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 17-36.
  • Wood, A. M.,Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. A. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 890-905. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005
  • Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 854-871.
  • Hlava, P., John, E., & Reid, O. (2014). A transcendent view of gratitude: The transpersonal gratitude scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 33(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.927909
  • Jackowska, M., Brown, J., Ronaldson, A., & Steptoe, A. (2016). The impact of a brief gratitude intervention on subjective well-being, biology, and sleep. Journal of Health Psychology, 21 (10), 2207-2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315572455
  • Krumrei, E. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Are gratitude and spirituality protective factors against psychopathology? Poster session presented at the 5th Biennial International Conference on Personal Meaning
  • Pruyser, P. W. (1976). The minister as diagnostician: Personal problems in pastoral perspective. Westminster.
  • Singh, A. K. (2017). Tests, measurements, and research methods. In Behavioural Sciences, Bengaluru: Bharathi Bhawan Publishers.
  • Tsang, J.A. (2006). Gratitude and pro-social behaviour: An experimental test of gratitude. Cognition and Emotion, 20(1), 138-148.
  • Rothenberg, W.A., Pirutinsky, S., Greer, D., & Korbman, M. (2015). Maintaining a grateful disposition in the face of distress: The role of religious coping. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8, 134-140.
  • Sharlin, S.A. (1996). Long-Term successful marriages in Israel. Contemporary Family Therapy, 18, 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196724
  • Schramm, D.G., Marshall, J.P., Harris, V.W., & Lee, T.R. (2005). After 'I do': The newly wed transition. Marriage and Family Review, 38, 45-67.

Abstract Views: 555

PDF Views: 0




  • Development and Standardisation of Anugraha-Loyola Gratitude Scale (ALGS-48)

Abstract Views: 555  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M Louie Doss
Research Scholar, Anugraha Institute of Social Sciences, (Affiliated to MKU, Madurai) Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
Lawrence SoosaiNathan
Ph.D., Research Supervisor, Head of the Department of Psychology, Anugraha Institute of Social Sciences Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Gratitude is one's “general tendency to recognize and respond with grateful emotion to other people's benevolence” (McCullough, Emmons, & Tsang, 2002, p. 2). It is considered a treasure, and all religions, cultures, and moral teachings have asserted the value and benefits of gratitude for nurturing human relations. This study aims at developing a tool to measure the level of gratitude in common people in the age group of 20-60. The constructed and validated Anugraha-Loyola Gratitude Scale (ALGS-48) consists of 48 items with six dimensions based on general, relational, emotional, spiritual, expressive, and ecological aspects. The suitability of the items was found in the first phase by the Cronbach Alpha test based on the pilot study (N = 160). The internal consistency, validity, reliability, and test-retest reliability of ALGS-48 were established based on the study conducted on a larger sample (N = 1116). The concurrent validity of the ALGS-48 scale was correlated with Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), Gratitude Questionnaire-Six-Item Form (GQ-6), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The results showed a positive correlation between OHQ and GQ-6 while BAI had a negative correlation. The applicability, limitations, and norms for the interpretation of ALGS-48 are discussed in detail. The results of this study indicate that the ALGS-48 possesses adequate psychometric qualities to measure gratitude among the commoners in the Indian context

Keywords


gratitude, scale construction and validation, dimensions of gratitude, well-being

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2022%2Fv13i4%2F218213