Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Joy Care: Development and Standardization of a Scale of Psychological Well-being
Subscribe/Renew Journal
This paper presents the process of standardisation of Joy Care, a newly developed scale of psychological wellbeing, which builds upon ideas put forward by Ryff (1989); Diener, Robert, Emmons, Larsen, and Griffin (1985); and Watson, Clarke, and Tullegen (1988) among others. To address the need for valid and reliable assessment that helps gauge psychological health, Joy-care was developed for the Indian population. While the scale is not a diagnostic tool, it aims to address gaps in data on mental well-being in the Indian context, and thus integrally supports the preventive model of health. The five domains being evaluated include: perception of self, relational well-being, emotional experience, perceived personal growth, life outlook, each producing a score from 1 to 5. The assessment has 98 items, is easily administered, accessible and available on Wellness Mandala's proprietary virtual platform. It requires the least amount of time and effort on the mental health professional's part, yet aims to provide in-depth insights that can guide the direction of psychotherapeutic interventions. The tool was developed and standardised, using a sample of 522 individuals, with appropriate psychometric properties, for the working Indian population, aged between 23 to 65 years. The scale was found to be highly internally consistent, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.948. Two distinct categories for norms were created based on age, i.e., those 32 and below and those 33 and above. Joy-care is a standardised, reliable and valid measure of psychological well-being developed for the Indian population that can be a valuable addition to the mental health community's efforts to support psychological well-being.
Keywords
psychological well-being, self-perception, relationships, emotional well-being, life satisfaction
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11. Doi:10.1007/s10902-006- 9018-1
- Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1 207/s15327752jpa4901_13
- Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069- 1081.
- Malla, S. S. (2013). Cross-cultural validity of Ryff's Well-being Scale in India. Asia- Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 9(4), 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510x14523107
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. Doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
- Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
- Kozma, A., & Stones, M. J. (1980). The measurement of happiness: Development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH). Journal of Gerontology, 35(6), 906-912.
- Suar, D., Jha, A. K., Das, S. S., & Alat, P. (2019). The structure and predictors of subjective well-being among millennials in India. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1584083. Doi:10.1080/23311908.2019.1584083
- Mehrotra, S., Tripathi, R., & Banu, H. (2013). Psychological well being :Reflections on an elusive construct and its assessment. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 39(2), 189-195. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publ ication/258947225_Psychological_well_being_Reflections_on_an_elusive_const ruct_and_its_assessment.
- Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A psychotherapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
- Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772 395
Abstract Views: 198
PDF Views: 0