Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Subjective Well-being and Depression: A Comparative Study among College Students


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study examines the differences in subjective well-being among mildly-depressed and non-depressed college students (n=160). Subjective well-being was assessed using measures of general well-being, life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect and self-esteem. The P.G.I. general well being scale was used to assess general well-being of the participants, while the Satisfaction with Life Scale was used to assess global life satisfaction. PANAS-R adapted from the original PANAS was used to measure affective responses while the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory was used to assess the self-esteem of participants. The results indicate that non-depressed participants reported better general well-being, greater life satisfaction, more positive affect and less negative affect and higher self-esteem as compared to mildly-depressed participants.

Keywords

Subjective Well-Being, Life Satisfaction, Positive Effect, Negative Effect, Self-Esteem
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 464

PDF Views: 0




  • Subjective Well-being and Depression: A Comparative Study among College Students

Abstract Views: 464  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vandana Kapur
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Meetu Khosla
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Abstract


The study examines the differences in subjective well-being among mildly-depressed and non-depressed college students (n=160). Subjective well-being was assessed using measures of general well-being, life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect and self-esteem. The P.G.I. general well being scale was used to assess general well-being of the participants, while the Satisfaction with Life Scale was used to assess global life satisfaction. PANAS-R adapted from the original PANAS was used to measure affective responses while the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory was used to assess the self-esteem of participants. The results indicate that non-depressed participants reported better general well-being, greater life satisfaction, more positive affect and less negative affect and higher self-esteem as compared to mildly-depressed participants.

Keywords


Subjective Well-Being, Life Satisfaction, Positive Effect, Negative Effect, Self-Esteem



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2013%2Fv4i3%2F49839