Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analyzing the Robust Factors of Overconfidence Bias and its Impact:An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Raffles University, NH - 8 Neemrana, Alwar - 301 705, Rajasthan, India
2 Assistant Professor, BML Munjal University, 67th KM Stone, NH-8, Dist. Gurgaon - 122 413, Haryana, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


People have a tendency to have too much reliance on the accuracy of their own judgments. This inclination boosts up the confidence limit of an individual, as people have the propensity to compare quantity with quality. Overconfidence is one of the prominent behavioral traits, which persuade an individual to make poor investment decisions without doing an impartial analysis of the available options. The distortion in the investment decision-making process is led by overconfident behavior which itself is adversely affected by a few of the factors. The objective of this paper was to explore and develop the relationships among the reviewed variables by keeping at the center the psychology of stock market investors. The interpretive structural modeling (ISM) methodology was used for identifying the prominent factors in a sequential manner. This provided a hierarchical structure apprenticing with planning, execution, categorizing, and conclusion, by way of providing output for the whole process. The factors were categorized as drivers, enablers, and dependent variables in the hierarchy of the ISM model. This model provided a framework for investors to spot out the robust factors of overconfidence in an orderly manner in the stock market, which distorts the investment decision making process.

Keywords

Behavioral Traits, Hierarchical Structure (Drivers, Enablers, and Dependent Variables), Interpretive Structural Modeling

C6, G00, G02

Paper Submission Date : May 16, 2015 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 5, 2015 ; Paper Acceptance Date : September 5, 2015.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 255

PDF Views: 0




  • Analyzing the Robust Factors of Overconfidence Bias and its Impact:An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

Abstract Views: 255  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ity Patni
Assistant Professor, Raffles University, NH - 8 Neemrana, Alwar - 301 705, Rajasthan, India
Sangita Choudhary
Assistant Professor, BML Munjal University, 67th KM Stone, NH-8, Dist. Gurgaon - 122 413, Haryana, India
Somya Choubey
Assistant Professor, Raffles University, NH - 8 Neemrana, Alwar - 301 705, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


People have a tendency to have too much reliance on the accuracy of their own judgments. This inclination boosts up the confidence limit of an individual, as people have the propensity to compare quantity with quality. Overconfidence is one of the prominent behavioral traits, which persuade an individual to make poor investment decisions without doing an impartial analysis of the available options. The distortion in the investment decision-making process is led by overconfident behavior which itself is adversely affected by a few of the factors. The objective of this paper was to explore and develop the relationships among the reviewed variables by keeping at the center the psychology of stock market investors. The interpretive structural modeling (ISM) methodology was used for identifying the prominent factors in a sequential manner. This provided a hierarchical structure apprenticing with planning, execution, categorizing, and conclusion, by way of providing output for the whole process. The factors were categorized as drivers, enablers, and dependent variables in the hierarchy of the ISM model. This model provided a framework for investors to spot out the robust factors of overconfidence in an orderly manner in the stock market, which distorts the investment decision making process.

Keywords


Behavioral Traits, Hierarchical Structure (Drivers, Enablers, and Dependent Variables), Interpretive Structural Modeling

C6, G00, G02

Paper Submission Date : May 16, 2015 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 5, 2015 ; Paper Acceptance Date : September 5, 2015.