Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Uncertainties in Bistatic RCS Measurements


Affiliations
1 Dept. of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal 506 004, India
2 Research Centre Imarat, DRDO, Hyderabad 500 069, India
 

Radar Cross Section (RCS) is a far field parameter and limited test range length produces error in its measurements. RCS measured with co-located Tx and Rx antennas is termed as monostatic RCS and with spatially separated Tx and Rx antennas as Bistatic RCS (BRCS). Interest in BRCS measurements has grown due to increase in use of multi-static Radars for detecting low-observable targets. In literature BRCS measurement techniques explored are either horn antenna based far field setups or Compact Antenna Test Range (CATR) based setups. All the techniques have inherent limitations and errors, which need to be assessed as the information generated plays a decisive role in the design of military platforms. In the present paper, the errors in each measurement technique are obtained through extensive numerical computation and measurements on various canonical as well as complex shapes. The results highlight the effect of the phase curvature in either or both, Tx, and Rx paths, affect the measurement accuracies, thereby limiting the target size and highest frequency of operation of present techniques.

Keywords

Antenna, Compact Antenna Test Ranges, Far Field, Plane Wave, Radar.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Balanis C A, Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 3rd edn (Wiley Inter science) 2005.

  • Bradley C, Collins P J, Fortuny-Guasch J, Hastriter M L, Nesti G, Terzuoli A J, & Wilson K L, An investigation of bistatic calibration objects, IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 43(10) (2005) 2177–2184, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.855138.

  • Eigel R L, Collins P J, Terzuoli A J, Nesti G & Fortuny J, Bistatic scattering characterization of complex objects, IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 38(5) (2000) 2078–2092, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.868867.

  • Gurel L, Bagci H, Castelli J C, Cheraly A & Tardivel F, Validation through comparison: Measurement and calculation of radar cross section of a stealth target, Radio Science, 38(3) (2003) (12-1) – (12-10), https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RS002583.

  • Knott E & Senior T B, How Far is Far?, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag, 22(5) (1974) 732–734, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1974.1140880.

  • Johnson R C, Antenna Range for Providing a Plane Wave for Antenna Measurements,” U.S.Patent 3,302,205 (1967).

  • Vokurka V J, Seeing double improves indoor range, Microwaves & RF, 24 (1985) 71–73,75,76,94, ISSN 0745-2993.

  • Chang D, Chang T Z, Liu R C & Fu I J, Measurement of bistatic radar Cross section in SA 5751 compact range, Proc IEEE Antennas Propag Soc Int Symp, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, (1993) https://doi.org/10.1109/APS.1993.385550.

  • Potgieter M,Odendaal J W, Blaauw C & Joubert J, Bistatic RCS measurements of large targets in a compact range, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag, 67(4) (2019) 2847–2852, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2019.2894328.

  • Knott E F, Schaeffer J F & Tulley M T, Radar Cross Section, 2nd edn (Sci Tech Publishing) 2004.


Abstract Views: 67

PDF Views: 65




  • Uncertainties in Bistatic RCS Measurements

Abstract Views: 67  |  PDF Views: 65

Authors

Rakesh Kumar Singh
Dept. of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal 506 004, India
D R Jahagirdhar
Research Centre Imarat, DRDO, Hyderabad 500 069, India
N V S N Sarma
Dept. of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal 506 004, India

Abstract


Radar Cross Section (RCS) is a far field parameter and limited test range length produces error in its measurements. RCS measured with co-located Tx and Rx antennas is termed as monostatic RCS and with spatially separated Tx and Rx antennas as Bistatic RCS (BRCS). Interest in BRCS measurements has grown due to increase in use of multi-static Radars for detecting low-observable targets. In literature BRCS measurement techniques explored are either horn antenna based far field setups or Compact Antenna Test Range (CATR) based setups. All the techniques have inherent limitations and errors, which need to be assessed as the information generated plays a decisive role in the design of military platforms. In the present paper, the errors in each measurement technique are obtained through extensive numerical computation and measurements on various canonical as well as complex shapes. The results highlight the effect of the phase curvature in either or both, Tx, and Rx paths, affect the measurement accuracies, thereby limiting the target size and highest frequency of operation of present techniques.

Keywords


Antenna, Compact Antenna Test Ranges, Far Field, Plane Wave, Radar.

References