Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Energy Efficient Protocol for Lifetime Prediction of Wireless Sensor Network Using Multivariate Polynomial Regression Model


Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, India
 

The sensor network performs gathering, monitoring, and tracking of objects in the given area. The sensor nodes are normally distributed randomly in the network area for collecting the information. The major issues in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are coverage, energy, and limited resources. Sensor Nodes’ (SN) performance depends on so many parameters but normally depends on Residual Energy (RE) and Distance from the base station. The Cluster Head (CH) cooperatively communicates with Base Station (BS) via routing protocols. The proposed Energy Efficient Multilevel Region Based (EEMRB) protocol performs the task by partitioning the entire network area into multiple levels and sub-levels. The sub-levels are partitioned to perform clusters to communicate the sensor via CH (s) using single/multi-hop communication to BS. The proposed protocol is compared with the Stable Election Protocol and shows improvement in network lifetime. Based on the proposed protocol data set, a Multivariate Polynomial Regression (MPR) Model is proposed to predict network lifetime. The model uses packet size and node density as network design parameters. The simulation results show that the size of the packet and network area play a major role in network lifetime. Therefore, the lifetime of the predicted model and EEMRB protocol are close to each other. This prediction model is suitable for the prediction of any network area's lifetime.

Keywords

Base Station, Cluster Head, Coverage and Connectivity, Residual Energy, Sensor Node Density.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Kannan K N & Paramasivan B, Development of energy-efficient routing protocol in wireless sensor networks using optimal gradient routing with on demand neighborhood information, Int J Distrib Sens Netw, 2014 (2014), doi: 10.1155/2014/208023.

  • Nokhanji N & Hanapi Z M, A survey on scluster-based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks, J Appl Sci, 14(18) (2014) 2011–2022.

  • Mehmood A, Lloret J & Sendra S, A secure and low-energy zone-based wireless sensor networks routing protocol for pollution monitoring, Wirel Commun Mob Comput, 16(17) (2016) 2869–2883.

  • Farsi M, Elhosseini M A, Badawy M, Ali H A & Eldin H Z, Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks, coverage and connectivity: A survey, IEEE Access, 7 (2019) 28940–28954.

  • Karthikeyan A & Shankar T, Transmission efficient protocol using population-based meta-heuristic technique with mobile sink for lifetime enhancement of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, J Theor Appl Inf Technol, 96(6) (2018) 1551–1560.

  • Purkait R & Tripathi S, Energy aware fuzzy based multi-hop routing protocol using unequal clustering, Wirel Pers Commun, 94(3) (2017) 809–833.

  • Wang Z X, Zhang M, Gao X, Wang W & Li X, A clustering WSN routing protocol based on node energy and multipath, ClusterComput, 22(3) (2019) 5811–5823.

  • Faheem M, Abbas M Z, Tuna G & Gungor V C, EDHRP: Energy efficient event driven hybrid routing protocol for densely deployed wireless sensor networks, J Netw Comput Appl, 58 (2015) 309–326.

  • Gomathi R M & Martin Leo Manickam J, Energy efficient shortest path routing protocol for underwater acoustic wireless sensor network, Wirel Pers Commun, 98(1) (2018) 843–856.

  • Nivedhitha V, Saminathan A G & Thirumurugan P, DMEERP: A dynamic multi-hop energy efficient routing protocol for WSN, Microprocess Microsyst, 79 (2020) 103291.

  • Chen Z & Shen H, A grid-based reliable multi-hop routing protocol for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks, Int J Distrib Sens Netw, 14(3) (2018), DOI: 10.1177/1550147718765962.

  • Eiras F C D S & Zucchi W L, A Statistical method for area coverage estimation and loss probability analysis on mobile sensor networks, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings, 42(1) (2019) 27.

  • Sanislav T, Zeadally S, Mois G D & Folea S C, Wireless energy harvesting: Empirical results and practical considerations for Internet of Things, J Netw Comput Appl, 121 (2018) 149–158.

  • Jaber G, Kacimi R & Mammeri Z, Exploiting redundancy for energy-efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks, in 9th IFIP Wireless Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC) (Colmar, France) 11–13 July 2016, 180–186, 10.1109/WMNC.2016.7543987.

  • Mulligan R & Ammari H M, Coverage in wireless sensor networks: a survey, Netw Protoc Algor, 2(2) (2010) 27–53.

  • Fan G & Jin S, Coverage problem in wireless sensor network: A survey, J Networks, 5(9) (2010) 1033.

  • Carlos-Mancilla M, López-Mellado E & Siller M, Wireless sensor networks formation: approaches and techniques, J Sensors, (2016) https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2081902.

  • Vipul N & Daniel A K, A novel protocol for detection and optimization of overlapping coverage in wireless sensor network, Int J Eng Adv Technol, 8(6S) (2019), DOI:10.35940/ijeat.F1001.0886S19

  • Baranidharan B, Srividhya S & Santhi B, Energy efficient hierarchical unequal clustering in wireless sensor networks, Indian J Sci Technol, 7(3) (2014) 301–305.

  • Lee S, Noh Y & Kim K, Key schemes for security enhanced TEEN routing protocol in wireless sensor networks, Int J Distrib Sens Netw, 9(6) (2013) 391986, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/391986.

  • Parmar J & Pirishothm A, Study of wireless sensor networks using leach, teen and apteen routing protocols, Int J Sci Res (IJSR), 4(5) (2015) 2319–7064.

  • Pillai M R & Jain R B, Application specific node deployment in WSN, in 2018 IEEE Global Conference on Wirel Compu and Netw (GCWCN) (2018) 168–172, DOI:10.1109/GCWCN.2018.8668617.

  • Noorikhameneh M & Moosavi M, A survey on the mobile sink hierarchical routing protocols in the wireless sensor networks, Int J Adv Netw Appl, 8(1) (2016) 2979.

  • Yarinezhad R & Hashemi S N, A cellular data dissemination model for wireless sensor networks, Pervasive Mob Comput, 48 (2018) 118–136.

  • Khan A W, Abdullah A H, Razzaque M A & Bangash J I, VGDRA: a virtual grid-based dynamic routes adjustment scheme for mobile sink-based wireless sensor networks, IEEE Sens J, 15(1) (2014) 526–534.

  • Narayan V & Daniel A K, A novel approach for cluster head selection using trust function in WSN, Scalable Computing: Practice Experience, 22(1) (2021) 1–13.

  • Narayan V, Daniel A K & Rai A K, Energy efficient two tier cluster based protocol for wireless sensor network, In 2020 Int Conf Electr Electron Eng (ICE3), (2020) 574–579.

  • Narayan V & Daniel A K, Multi-tier cluster based smart farming using wireless sensor network, in 2020 5th Int Conf Comput Comm Secy (ICCCS), (2020) 1–5, DOI:10.1109/ICCCS49678.2020.9277072.

  • Dias G M, Bellalta B & Oechsner S, The impact of dual prediction schemes on the reduction of the number of transmissions in sensor networks, Comput Commun, 112 (2017) 58–72.

  • Xu X & Zhang G, A hybrid model for data prediction in real-world wireless sensor networks, IEEE Commu Lett, 25(5) (2017) 1712–1715.

  • Xue X, Sun W, Wang J, Li Q, Luo G & Yu K, RVFL-LQP: RVFL-based link quality prediction of wireless sensor networks in smart grid, IEEE Access, 8 (2020) 7829–7841.

  • Fathy Y, Barnaghi P & Tafazolli R, An adaptive method for data reduction in the internet of things, in 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), (2018) 729–735, DOI:10.1109/WF-IoT.2018.8355187.

  • Samarah S, Vector-based data prediction model for wireless sensor networks, Int J High Perform Comput Netw, 9(4) (2016) 310–315.

  • Zeng M, Huang X, Zheng B & Fan X, A heterogeneous energy wireless sensor network clustering protocol, Wirel Commun Mob Comput, (2019).

  • Sagar P, Gupta P & Kashyap I, A forecasting method with efficient selection of variables in multivariate data sets, Int J Inf Technol, 13(3) (2021) 1039–1046.

  • Mishra A K, Kumar R, Kumar V & Singh J, A grid-based approach to prolong lifetime of WSNs using fuzzy logic, Int Adv Compu Intel, (2017) 11–22. in Advances in Computational Intelligence, edited by S Sahana, S Saha, part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC vol 509), Springer, Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2525-9_2

  • Narayan V & Daniel A K, CHHP: Coverage optimization and hole healing protocol using sleep and wake-up concept for wireless sensor network, Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag, 13(1) (2022) 546–556.

  • Narayan V & Daniel A K, CHOP: Maximum coverage optimization and resolve hole healing problem using sleep and wake-up technique for WSN, ADCAIJ: Adv Distrib Comput Artif Intell J, 11(2) (2022) 159–178, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/adcaij.27271.


Abstract Views: 117

PDF Views: 92




  • Energy Efficient Protocol for Lifetime Prediction of Wireless Sensor Network Using Multivariate Polynomial Regression Model

Abstract Views: 117  |  PDF Views: 92

Authors

Vipul Narayan
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, India
A K Daniel
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, India

Abstract


The sensor network performs gathering, monitoring, and tracking of objects in the given area. The sensor nodes are normally distributed randomly in the network area for collecting the information. The major issues in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are coverage, energy, and limited resources. Sensor Nodes’ (SN) performance depends on so many parameters but normally depends on Residual Energy (RE) and Distance from the base station. The Cluster Head (CH) cooperatively communicates with Base Station (BS) via routing protocols. The proposed Energy Efficient Multilevel Region Based (EEMRB) protocol performs the task by partitioning the entire network area into multiple levels and sub-levels. The sub-levels are partitioned to perform clusters to communicate the sensor via CH (s) using single/multi-hop communication to BS. The proposed protocol is compared with the Stable Election Protocol and shows improvement in network lifetime. Based on the proposed protocol data set, a Multivariate Polynomial Regression (MPR) Model is proposed to predict network lifetime. The model uses packet size and node density as network design parameters. The simulation results show that the size of the packet and network area play a major role in network lifetime. Therefore, the lifetime of the predicted model and EEMRB protocol are close to each other. This prediction model is suitable for the prediction of any network area's lifetime.

Keywords


Base Station, Cluster Head, Coverage and Connectivity, Residual Energy, Sensor Node Density.

References