Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Trenchless Mechanized Inspection and Retrofitting Strategy for Buried Sewerage Systems


Affiliations
1 Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
2 Structural Engineering Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
 

The conventional retrofitting methods of buried sewer pipes require heavy machinery, intensive manpower, and a longer time for rehabilitation. Such methods may also damage the nearby infrastructures and landscapes. The present study explores an integrated trenchless solution for damage identification and mechanized retrofitting of domestic buried sewerage pipelines of diameter ranging from 75 to 300 mm. A front-mounted camera of the retrofitting system assesses the damage inside the sewer pipes. The retrofitting of the damaged part of buried pipe is achieved by impregnation of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composite sheet with 100:16 epoxy and hardener ratio. The wrapping of the GFRP sheets on damaged part is done by inflation and deflation technique with a cylindrical rubber bladder connected by a flexible shaft. The retrofitted sewer pipe can be resumed after 3–4 hours of applying the impregnated GFRP composite with above retrofitting strategy.

Keywords

Damage Detection, Fiber-Reinforced Polymer, In-Pipe Retrofitting, Mechanized System, Rubber Bladder.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Dolowitz D P, Bell S & Keeley M, Retrofitting urban drainage infrastructure: green or grey?, Urban Water J, 15(1) (2018) 83–91.
  • Kirkham R, Kearney P D, Rogers K J & Mashford J, PIRAT - a system for quantitative sewer pipe assessment, Int J Rob Res, 19(11) (2000) 1033–1053.
  • Guo W, Soibelman L & Garrett Jr J H, Automated defect detection for sewer pipeline inspection and condition assessment, Autom Constr, 18(5) (2009) 587–596.
  • Truong-Thinh N, Ngoc-Phuong N & Phuoc-Tho T, A study of pipe-cleaning and inspection robot, in IEEE Int Conf on Rob and Biomimetics (IEEE) 2011, 2593–2598.
  • Moradi, S, Zayed T & Golkhoo F, Review on computer aided sewer pipeline defect detection and condition assessment, Infrastructures, 4(1) (2019) 10.
  • Cheng J C & Wang M, Automated detection of sewer pipe defects in closed-circuit television images using deep learning techniques, Autom Constr, 95 (2018) 155–171.
  • Yin X, Bouferguene A & Al-Hussein M, Data-Driven Sewer Pipe Data Random Generation and Validation, J Constr Eng Manage, 146(12) (2020) 04020131.
  • Gupta BS, Chandrasekaran S & Ibrahim S, A survey of sewer rehabilitation in Malaysia: application of trenchless technologies, Urban Water J, (4) (2001) 309–315.
  • Ehsani M, Latest advances in pipeline renovation with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP), in Water Distribution Syst Anal, (2010) 200–208.
  • Ehsani M R & Saadatmanesh H, Fiber composite plates for strengthening bridge beams, Compos Struct, 15(4) (1990) 343–355.
  • Lim K S, Azraai S N, Noor N M & Yahaya N, An overview of corroded pipe repair techniques using composite materials, Int J Mater Metall Eng, 10(1) (2015) 19–25.
  • Ehsani M, Superlaminate: the next generation of carbon FRP products for repair of pipelines, In Pipelines 2010: Climbing New Peaks to Infrastruct Reliab: Renew, Rehab, and Reinvest, (2010) 1280–1289.
  • Zhong Z, Wang S, Zhao M, Du X & Li L, Performance of ductile iron push-on joints rehabilitated with CIPP liner under repetitive and seismic loadings, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 115 (2018) 776–786.
  • Kaushal V, Najafi M, Serajiantehrani R, Malek Mohammadi M, & Shirkhanloo S, Construction cost comparison between trenchless cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) renewal and open-cut replacement for sanitary sewer applications, in Pipelines, (2022) 171–177.
  • Perez C, Trenchless technologies for the rehabilitation of sewers: Case study of the Patapsco interceptors, Baltimore, J Public Works Infrastruct, 2(4) (2010).
  • Carroll J B, Kozman D P & Marc-Aurele C, Assessment and Application of Trenchless Technologies for the Rehabilitation of Sewer Laterals, in Pipelines (Reston, VA) 2020, 256–262.
  • Montero R, Victores JG, Martinez S, Jardón A & Balaguer C, Past, present and future of robotic tunnel inspection, Autom Constr, 59 (2015), 99–112.
  • Mills G H, Jackson A E & Richardson R C, Advances in the inspection of unpiggable pipelines, Robotics, 6(4) (2017) 36.
  • Zhao W, Zhang L & Kim J, Design and analysis of independently adjustable large in-pipe robot for longdistance pipeline, Appl Sci, 10(10) (2020) 3637.
  • Yang W & Zhang W, A worm-inspired robot flexibly steering on horizontal and vertical surfaces, Appl Sci, 9(10) (2019) 2168.
  • Ren T, Zhang Y, L Y, Chen Y & Liu Q, Driving mechanisms, motion, and mechanics of screw drive in-pipe robots: A review, Appl Sci, 9(12) (2019) 2514.
  • Kakogawa A & Ma S, Design of a multilink-articulated wheeled pipeline inspection robot using only passive elastic joints, Adv Rob, 32(1) (2018) 37–50.
  • Jayasuriya S, Chegeni B & Das S, Use of BFRP wrap for rehabilitation of pipeline in bending with various corrosion depths, J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract, 11(1) (2020) 04019038.
  • Sivasaravanan S, Sangeetha M, Prakash S, Reddy T D & Rahul D P, Experimental investigation of composite material laminated with Aloe vera fiber in different composite resin, Mater Today Proc, 16 (2019) 832–837.
  • Szewczak A, Influence of epoxy glue modification on the adhesion of CFRP tapes to concrete surface, Materials, 14(21) (2021) 6339.
  • Farooq M & Banthia N, Strain-hardening fiber reinforced polymer concrete with a low carbon footprint, Constr Build, 314 (2022) 125705.
  • Singh K P, Singh A, Kumar N & Tripathi D N, Morphological features, dielectric and thermal properties of epoxy–copper cobaltite nanocomposites: preparation and characterization, Bull Mater Sci, 43 (2020) 1–10.
  • Arputhabalan J, Karunamoorthy L & Palanikumar K, Experimental investigation on the mechanical properties of aluminium sandwiched sisal/kenaf/aloevera/jute/flax natural fibre-reinforced epoxy LY556/GY250 composites, Polym Polym Compos, 29(9) (2021) 1495–1504.
  • Alabtah F G, Mahdi E & Eliyan F F, The use of fiber reinforced polymeric composites in pipelines: A review, Compos Struct, 276 (2021) 114595.
  • Mohamed H M & Masmoudi R, Flexural strength and behavior of steel and FRP-reinforced concrete-filled FRP tube beams, Eng Struct, 32(11) (2010) 3789–3800.

Abstract Views: 129

PDF Views: 88




  • Trenchless Mechanized Inspection and Retrofitting Strategy for Buried Sewerage Systems

Abstract Views: 129  |  PDF Views: 88

Authors

Ravindra Singh Bisht
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Dinesh Kumar
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Naman Garg
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Vikesh Kumar
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Siddharth Singh
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Sameer
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Soraj Kumar Panigrahi
Construction Automation and Robotics Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India
Ajay Chourasia
Structural Engineering Group, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247 667, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract


The conventional retrofitting methods of buried sewer pipes require heavy machinery, intensive manpower, and a longer time for rehabilitation. Such methods may also damage the nearby infrastructures and landscapes. The present study explores an integrated trenchless solution for damage identification and mechanized retrofitting of domestic buried sewerage pipelines of diameter ranging from 75 to 300 mm. A front-mounted camera of the retrofitting system assesses the damage inside the sewer pipes. The retrofitting of the damaged part of buried pipe is achieved by impregnation of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composite sheet with 100:16 epoxy and hardener ratio. The wrapping of the GFRP sheets on damaged part is done by inflation and deflation technique with a cylindrical rubber bladder connected by a flexible shaft. The retrofitted sewer pipe can be resumed after 3–4 hours of applying the impregnated GFRP composite with above retrofitting strategy.

Keywords


Damage Detection, Fiber-Reinforced Polymer, In-Pipe Retrofitting, Mechanized System, Rubber Bladder.

References