Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Towards Safety Assessment Checklist for Safety-Critical Systems


Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Safety-critical systems are ever increasing in day to day life such as use from microwave oven to robots involving computer systems and software. Safetycritical systems must consider safety engineering and safety management principles in order to be safe when they are put into use. Safety analysis must be done. Safety assessment of such systems is difficult but not impossible. They must deal with the hazards analysis in order to reduce or prevent risks to environment, property damage and/or loss of life through risk-free and failure free or fail-safe operations. The existing methods are found to be limited and inadequate to address the risks associated and for safety assessment. This paper proposes a methodology for safety assessment of safety critical systems based on identifying significant and non-significant aspects of risk. The methodology considers various contributions towards risk and safety assessment. The methodology reviews existing risk categories and classification. This paper also presents a set of risk contributing factors and significance denoting function. A case study of typical power plant operations for safety assessment is presented to validate proposed methodology. The methodology provides clarity to improve safety of safety-critical systems. This paper also discusses about the scope of automation. The results indicated that substantial increase in risk ranking with the proposed methodology to that of existing risk ranking indicating the safety assessment.

Keywords

Safety-Critical Systems, Functional Safety, Software Safety, Software Quality, Safety Automation
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Dunn, W. R. (2003). Designing Safety Critical Computer Systems. Published by the IEEE Computer Society 0018-9162/03/$17.00 © 2003 IEEE (pp. 40-46).
  • IEEE 100, The Authoritative Dictionary of Standard Terms. IEEE Press 2000.
  • IEC, International Standard, Functional Safety of Electrical/ Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety- Related Systems–IEC 61508-3. Part 3 Software Requirements. (1998).
  • Knight, J. C. (2002). Safety Critical Systems: Challenges and Directions. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 547-550) Orlando, Florida.
  • Kumar, S. P., Ramaiah, P. S. & Khanaa, V. (2009). A Methodology for Modeling Software Safety in Safety-Critical Computing Systems. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, July, 9(7), 185-193.
  • Lawrence, J. D. & Preckshot, G. G. (1994). Design Factors for Safety-Critical Software. Retrieved from http://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/228132.p
  • Leveson, N. (1995). Software: System Safety and Computers. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading.
  • Leveson, N. G. (1986). Software Safety-Why, What and How. ACM Computing Surveys, June, 18(2), 125-163.
  • Leveson, N. G. (2004). The role of software in spacecraft accidents. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 41(4), 564-575.
  • Leveson, N. G. & Turner, C. (1993). An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, July, 26(7), 18-41.
  • Medikonda, B. S. & Panchumarthy, S. R. (2009). A framework for software safety in safety-critical systems. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1507195.1507207. DOI: 10.1145/1507195.1507207
  • MIL-STD-882C. (1984). System Safety Program Requirements. Department of Defense.
  • MIS-STD-882B. (1984). System Safety Program Requirements. Department of Defense.
  • MISRA. (1994). Development Guidelines for Vehicle Based Software.
  • NASA Technical Standard. (1997). Software Safety. Retrieved from http://satc.nasa.gov/assure/distasst.pdf
  • NTPC Limited: A Government of India Enterprise. Retrieved from http://www.ntpc.co.in
  • Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification. DO178B (1992).

Abstract Views: 461

PDF Views: 4




  • Towards Safety Assessment Checklist for Safety-Critical Systems

Abstract Views: 461  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

P.V. Srinivas Acharyulu
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
P. S. Ramaiah
Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract


Safety-critical systems are ever increasing in day to day life such as use from microwave oven to robots involving computer systems and software. Safetycritical systems must consider safety engineering and safety management principles in order to be safe when they are put into use. Safety analysis must be done. Safety assessment of such systems is difficult but not impossible. They must deal with the hazards analysis in order to reduce or prevent risks to environment, property damage and/or loss of life through risk-free and failure free or fail-safe operations. The existing methods are found to be limited and inadequate to address the risks associated and for safety assessment. This paper proposes a methodology for safety assessment of safety critical systems based on identifying significant and non-significant aspects of risk. The methodology considers various contributions towards risk and safety assessment. The methodology reviews existing risk categories and classification. This paper also presents a set of risk contributing factors and significance denoting function. A case study of typical power plant operations for safety assessment is presented to validate proposed methodology. The methodology provides clarity to improve safety of safety-critical systems. This paper also discusses about the scope of automation. The results indicated that substantial increase in risk ranking with the proposed methodology to that of existing risk ranking indicating the safety assessment.

Keywords


Safety-Critical Systems, Functional Safety, Software Safety, Software Quality, Safety Automation

References