International Journal of Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Review on FEM Analysis of Mandibular Overdenture Implant


Affiliations
1 G.H. Raisoni College Engineering, Nagpur 440016, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur 440003, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Various types of attachment techniques are available for overdenture implants. The design of removable overdenture for good retention & stability is difficult. This paper reviews various concepts involved in overdenture implant design and their comparison. It is seen that many treatment concepts involving mandibular overdenture are based on empirical experiences of individual. Clinicians often base their selection of implant location and attachment systems empirically on expected retentive quality. Various location methods are presented along with a comparison of Monovum i.e. single implant overdenture with other types of attachments.

Keywords

Overdenture, Bar and Clip Attachment, Ball Attachment, Single Implant Overdenture.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ash Nelson, wheelr’s Dental Anatomy, Physilogy & Occlusion Eight Edition, Saunder Publication.

  • Felton DA. Edentulism and comorbid factors.J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18:88-96.

  • Academy of Prosthodontics: Glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92

  • Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Feb;37:143-56.

  • Beltran-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, et al.: Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis – United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. In MMWR CDC Surveill. Volume 54. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005:1-44.

  • Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, Zion GR. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988--1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:684--95.

  • Lang BR. A review of traditional therapies in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Nov;72:538-42.

  • Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Jan;49:5-15.

  • Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: support. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Mar;49:306-13.

  • Morrow RM, Feldmann EE, Rudd KD, Trovillion HM. Toothsupported complete dentures: an approach to preventive prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1969 May;21:513-22.

  • Shor A, Goto Y, Shor K. Mandibular two-implant-retained overdenture: prosthetic design and fabrication protocol. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007 Feb;28:808

  • Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86:468-73.

  • Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15:24-34.

  • Wahab LA, Sadig W. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Nov-Dec;21:511-3.

  • Fatalla AA, Song K, Du T, Cao Y. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2012 Feb;32:124-9

  • Michael David Scherer, D.M.D. Comparison of Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Overdentures Based Upon Implant Location, Number, and Distribution Graduate Program in DentistryThe Ohio State University 2012

  • Vijay Prakash, M. D’souza, Raviraj Adhikari, A comparision of stress disribution and flexion amongs various design of bar attachment for implant overdature: a three Dimentional Finite Element Anaylsis. http://www.ijdr.in. august 2012

  • Torsten Jemt, DDS, PhD/John Chai, BDS, MS/Joseph Harnett, DDS/M. Robin Heath, PhD, BDS, FDSRCS/John E. Hutton, DDS, MS, MPH/Richard B. Johns, PhD, LDSRCS/Samuel McKenna, DDS, MD/David C. McNamara, BDSc, MDS, PhD/Daniel van Steenberghe, MD, PhD/Ross Taylor, BDS, MDS, FRACDS/Roger M. Watson, BDS, MDS, FDSRCS/Irene Herrmann, DDS A 5-Year Prospective Multicenter Follow-up Report on Overdentures Supported by Osseointegrated Implants JOMI on CD-ROM, 1996 Mar (291-298 )

  • Gerald Krennmair, MD, DMD1/Christian Ulm, MD, DMD2 The Symphyseal Single-tooth Implant for Anchorage of a Mandibular Complete Denture in Geriatric Patients: A Clinical Report INTJ ORALMAXILLOFACIMPLANTS2001;16:98–104

  • Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:108- 25

  • Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981Dec;10:387-416.

  • Neukam FW, Hausamen JE, Schliephake H. Surgical aspects of implant installation. In Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Worthington P. Osseointegration in Oral Rehabilitation (pp. 87-104) London: Quintessence.

  • Misch CE, Crawford EA. Predictable mandibular nerve location-- a clinical zone of safety. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;7:37-40.64.

  • Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Impl. Res. 0, 2011, 1–9.

  • Schwartz IS, Morrow RM. Overdentures. Principles and procedures. Dent Clin North Am. 1996 Jan;40:169-94.

  • Petropoulos VC, Smith W, Kousvelari E. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Mar- Apr;12:176-85.

  • Belser UC, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Taylor TD. Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:126-45.

  • Dodge CA. Prevention of complete denture problems by use of "overdentures". J Prosthet Dent. 1973 Oct;30:403-11.

  • Sarnat AE. The efficiency of cobalt samarium (Co5Sm) magnets as retention units for overdentures. J Dent. 1983 Dec;11:324-3


Abstract Views: 997

PDF Views: 0




  • A Review on FEM Analysis of Mandibular Overdenture Implant

Abstract Views: 997  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ashutosh D. Bagde
G.H. Raisoni College Engineering, Nagpur 440016, Maharashtra, India
S.B. Jaju
G.H. Raisoni College Engineering, Nagpur 440016, Maharashtra, India
P.G. Patil
Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur 440003, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Various types of attachment techniques are available for overdenture implants. The design of removable overdenture for good retention & stability is difficult. This paper reviews various concepts involved in overdenture implant design and their comparison. It is seen that many treatment concepts involving mandibular overdenture are based on empirical experiences of individual. Clinicians often base their selection of implant location and attachment systems empirically on expected retentive quality. Various location methods are presented along with a comparison of Monovum i.e. single implant overdenture with other types of attachments.

Keywords


Overdenture, Bar and Clip Attachment, Ball Attachment, Single Implant Overdenture.

References