Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Kapil
- Mutual Fund Purchases by High Net Worth Individuals in India
Abstract Views :300 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICFAI Business School Jai Singh Palace, 7, Jaisingh Nagar Indore 452017 (Madhya Pradesh)
1 ICFAI Business School Jai Singh Palace, 7, Jaisingh Nagar Indore 452017 (Madhya Pradesh)
Source
Journal of Management Research, Vol 6, No 2 (2006), Pagination: 59-71Abstract
Mutual Funds (MFs) are an investment avenue for small investors. However, it has been observed that Indian MFs industry is dominated by institutional investors who hold about 65% of the Indian mutual fund assets, whereas retail investors account for only 1.3%. In the last decade, High Net Worth Individuals (HNWIs) have emerged as prominent players in the MF segment. A number of studies have been conducted to identify factors that motivate small investors to invest in Mutual Funds. There is sufficient amount of research that would help identify factors, which influence non Indian HNWIs, but research relating specifically to Indian HNWIs is lacking. This study aims to identify factors that drive Indian HNWIs to invest in Mutual Funds.Keywords
High Net Worth Individuals, Mutual Funds, InvestmentsReferences
- Attracting the Affluent: The First Guide to America's Changing Ultimate Market (1991), Financial Sourcebooks, Naperville, IL.
- Bowdoin, H (1986), Hybrid Products: An Alternative for Capturing the Emerging Affluent Market, Journal of Retail Banking 8 (Spring-Summer): 35-40.
- Burnett, J J (1991), Examining the Media Habits of the Affluent Elderly, Journal of Advertising Research 31 (October-Nov): 33-41.
- Business Week (1993), The Power of Mutual Funds, Business Week (18 January): 62-8.
- Capon, N, Fitzsimons, G and Prince, R A (1992), Rationality and the Mutual Fund Purchase Decision, under review for Journal of Financial Services Research.
- Consumer Reports Survey (1990), Survey Research Report: Mutual Fund Survey, unpublished manuscript.
- Elton, E J and Gruber, M J (1989), Modern Portfolio Theory and Empirical Work, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
- Grinblatt, M and Titman, S (1989), Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings, Journal of Business 62 (July): 393-416.
- Hirschman, E C (1990), Secular Immortality and the American Ideology of Affluence, Journal of Consumer Research 17 (June): 31- 42.
- Kane, Snatini and Aber (1991), Lessons from the Growth History of Mutual Funds, working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
- Liebtag, B (1986), Marketing to the Affluent, Journal of Accountancy 162 (August): 64-71.
- Markowitz, H (1959), Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
- Metzger, R O and Dey, S (1986), Affluent Consumers: What Do They Really Want?, Journal of Retail Banking 8 (Fall): 25-35.
- Patel, Zeckhauser, R and Hendricks, O (1992), Investment Flows and Performance: Evidence from Mutual Funds, Cross Border Investments and New Issues, working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
- Prince, R A and Shutz, A (1989), Targeting the Affluent Small Business Owner, Bank Marketing 21(11): 38-9.
- Rose, S (1992), A New Approach to Private Banking, Journal of Retail Banking 14 (Summer): 11-15.
- Stanley, T J (1988), Targeting the Affluent Consumer, Journal of Business Strategy 9 (September-October): 17-20.
- Stanley, T J, Moschis, G P and Danko, W O (1987), Financial Service Segments: the Seven Faces of the Affluent Market, Journal of Advertising Research 27 (August-September): 52-67.
- Stanley, T J and Sewall, M A (1986), The Response of Affluent Consumers to Mail Surveys, Journal of Advertising Research 26 (June- July): 55-8.
- Tynan, C (1990), Marketing to the Older Consumer: A Qualitative Perspective, Management Decision 28(6): 34-41.
- Gender Diversity Management in Indian it Organizations
Abstract Views :203 |
PDF Views:130
Authors
Affiliations
1 Computer Sciences Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., Indore, M.P., HU
2 Institute of Management Studies, Devi Ahilya University, Indore-452001, IN
1 Computer Sciences Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., Indore, M.P., HU
2 Institute of Management Studies, Devi Ahilya University, Indore-452001, IN
Source
Management Dynamics, Vol 13, No 2 (2013), Pagination: 51-60Abstract
The concept of diversity management has been in news since the past two decades. Owing to the increasing workforce diversity which is mainly the result of the management's acknowledgement of the fact that diverse workforce results in innovative ideas and higher overall organisational efficiency, more and more organisations are seriously considering the diversity management techniques to maintain harmony among the workers. On comparing workforce in the present with that of the past, we see a considerable demographic shift in terms of nationalities, ethnic background, socio-economic status etc. Although the management off-late has recognized the importance of diversity management, it has not been easy for them to implement. This paper focuses on the issue of managing gender diversity in IT organizations in India.- Developing High Adaptive Capabilities:The Case of CISCO
Abstract Views :216 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Strategy & International Business, Indian Institute of Management - Indore, IN
2 Acropolis Institute of Technology, Indore, IN
1 Strategy & International Business, Indian Institute of Management - Indore, IN
2 Acropolis Institute of Technology, Indore, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 54, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 146-162Abstract
The internet and power of intelligent network help firms to increase its enterprise value by entering new markets, developing new products, creating flexible operations structure, attracting good people and thus increasing the willingness to pay. CISCO predicted all these opportunities and enchased its capabilities which helped them capitalize on the globalization advantages. CISCO developed high adaptive capabilities (HAC) and implemented choices that helped it invest rightly and kept the cost of business under control which helped in record superior returns on investment and shorter payback period. HAC not only helped CISCO in optimizing the total cost of ownership (TCO) but also maintaining benchmarked service level agreements (SLA). CISCO reinvented its business model to synergize the resources across the organization.References
- Adner. Ron .(2006) , “Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem”, Harvard Business Review, 84 (4): 98-107
- Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon, Ricart, Joan E (2011), “How to Design A Winning Business Model”, Harvard Business Review, 89 (1/2):100-07
- Chambers, John (2015), “CISCO’S CEO on Staying Ahead of Technology Shifts”, Harvard Business Review,93(5):35-38
- CISCO Annual Report 2017
- Collis, David J., Montgomery, Cynthia,A. (2008),”Competing on Resources”, Harvard Business Review, 86 (7/8):140-50.
- Eisenhardt, K.M. & Graebner, M.E. (2007), “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges”, Academy of Management Journal, 50(1):25-32.
- Ethiraj, S.K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M.S. & Singh, J.V. (2005), “Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services Industry ” , Strategic Management Journal, 26(1):25-45.
- Gluck,F. W. , D. Gogel & A. Puri (2000), “The Business System: A New Tool for Strategy Formulation and Cost Analysis,” in McKinsey on Strategy, Boston: McKinsey & Co
- Frangos, Cassandra (2015), “How Cisco Gets Brutally Honest Feedback to Top Leaders”, Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 12/29/2015
- Fryer, Bronwyn & Stewart, Thomas A. (2008), “CISCO Sees the Future” Harvard Business Review, 86(1):72-79
- Petrash, G. (1996), “Dow’s Journey to a Knowledge Value Management Culture,” European Management Journal, 14: 365–73 Ghemawat, Pankaj (1986), ”Sustainable Advantage”, Harvard Business Review, 64 (5): 5358.
- Greenley, Gordon E., Graham J. Hooley & John M. Rudd. (2005), “Market Orientation in a Multiple Stakeholder Orientation Context: Implications for Marketing Capabilities and Assets”, Journal of Business Research, 58 (11): 1483 -94
- Hamel, Gary & Prahalad, C. K (992), ”Capabilities based Competition”, Harvard Business Review,70( 3):164-70.
- Kay, J. (1999), “Resource Based Strategy, “Financial Times, September 27
- Trailer, J. W (2002), “On the Theory of Rent and the Mechanics of Proutability,” The California State University, Chico, College of Business Chico CSU Chico,
- Johnson, Mark W., Christensen, Clayton M. & Kagermann, Henning (2008), “Reinventing Your Business Model”, Harvard Business Review. 86(12):50
- Jouret, Guido (2009), “Inside Cisco’s Search for the Next Big Idea”, Harvard Business Review, 87(9): 43-45
- Johnson, Mark W., Christensen, Clayton M.,Kagermann, Henning(2008), “Reinventing Your Business Model (cover story)”, Harvard Business Review, 86 (12): 57-68.
- Iansit, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, March.
- Lopez, Salvador Vivas (2005), Competitive Advantage and Strategy Formulation - The Key Role of Dynamic Capabilities, Management Decision, 43 (5): 661-69.
- Magretta, J. (2002), “Why Business Models Matter,” Harvard Business Review, 80: 38
- Monterde, Stephan (2016), “How We Think about Innovation at Cisco” Harvard Business Review, Digital Articles: 6/8/2016,
- Moore, J. F. (1993), Predators and Prey: a New Ecology of Competition”, Harvard business Review, 71(3): 75-86
- Moore, J. F. (1996), The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, New York: Harper Business.
- Moore, Marguerite & Ann Fairhurst (2003), “Marketing Capabilities and Firm Performance in Fashion Retailing”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7 (4): 38697.
- Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. & Allen, J. (2005), “The Entrepreneur’s Business Model: Toward a Unified Perspective”, Journal of Business Research, 58: 726-35.
- Newbert, Scott L(2008), ”Value, Rareness, Competitive Advantage, and Performance: a Conceptual-level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-based View of the Firm” Strategic Management Journal, 29(7):74568.
- Pankaj Gemawat & Jan W Rivkin (1998, revised 2006) “Creating Competitive Advantage”, HBS Note : 798 062
- Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press
- Porter, M. E. (1996), “What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74: 61-78.
- Prahalad, C. K.; Hamel, Gary (1990), ”The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review ,68(3):79-91.
- Prahalad, C. K. & Gary Hamel (1990), “The Core Competencies of the Corporation” Harvard Business Review, May–June 1990
- Shaligram, B. J. (2014) , “Organizational Capability and Their Strategic Impact on Firm’s Market Share” ,International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(12)
- Teece, D. J. (2010), “Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation,” Long Range Planning, 43: 172-94
- Tracey, Michel., Feen-Su Lim. & Mark, A. Vonderembse (2005), “The Impact of Supply Chain Management Capabilities on Business Performance”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(3): 179–91.
- Umit, Bititci, Catherine Maguire, & Ian Gregory (2011), Adaptive Capability A Must for Manufacturing SMEs of the Future SMEs, research report ,futuresme.edu,
- Vorhies, Douglas W. & Neil A Morgan (2005), “Bench marking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Marketing, 69 (January): 80 – 94.
- Werbach, K. (September 2005 Issue), “Using VoIP to Compete”, Harvard Business Review,01 Sep 2005, 83(9):140-7, 160]
- Wernerfelt, Birger (1984), ”A Resource based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2):171-80.
- Yan ru li (2009), “The Technology Road Map of Cisco Business Model”, Technovation, 29:379-86
- Yin, R K(2003), Case Study Research Design and Methods, Sage Publication, Beverley Hills