Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance Comparison of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocols in Mobile Networks using NS-2


Affiliations
1 Communication and Networking, KLNCIT, Madurai - 630612, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of ECE, KLNCIT, Madurai - 630612, Tamil Nadu, India
 

Background/Objective: To ensure about which protocol is best for mobile networks by comparing the performances of DSR, DSDV and AODV protocols using NS-2. Method/Statistical Analysis: The functionalities of the three protocols have been compared by the three performance metrics such as Packet Delivery Ratio, Control Overhead and End to End Delay for the changing scenario. Findings: By comparing the packet delivery, it is clear that DSDV protocol is not good but, by comparing the control overhead, DSDV has very high control overhead than DSR and AODV protocols. AODV protocol performs well in some cases but considering the overall performances, DSR performs good than AODV protocol. Improvements/Applications: The protocols design will be improved to adapt themselves for all the changing scenario of the networks and this will be helpful in many applications such as military applications, emergency rescue operations, exploration missions etc.

Keywords

AODV, Control Overhead, DSDV, DSR, End to End Delay, Mobility, Packet Delivery Ratio, Packet Size, Time Interval
User

Abstract Views: 159

PDF Views: 0




  • Performance Comparison of AODV, DSDV and DSR Protocols in Mobile Networks using NS-2

Abstract Views: 159  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. F. Sophia Pearlin
Communication and Networking, KLNCIT, Madurai - 630612, Tamil Nadu, India
G. Rekha
Department of ECE, KLNCIT, Madurai - 630612, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Background/Objective: To ensure about which protocol is best for mobile networks by comparing the performances of DSR, DSDV and AODV protocols using NS-2. Method/Statistical Analysis: The functionalities of the three protocols have been compared by the three performance metrics such as Packet Delivery Ratio, Control Overhead and End to End Delay for the changing scenario. Findings: By comparing the packet delivery, it is clear that DSDV protocol is not good but, by comparing the control overhead, DSDV has very high control overhead than DSR and AODV protocols. AODV protocol performs well in some cases but considering the overall performances, DSR performs good than AODV protocol. Improvements/Applications: The protocols design will be improved to adapt themselves for all the changing scenario of the networks and this will be helpful in many applications such as military applications, emergency rescue operations, exploration missions etc.

Keywords


AODV, Control Overhead, DSDV, DSR, End to End Delay, Mobility, Packet Delivery Ratio, Packet Size, Time Interval



DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2016%2Fv9i8%2F131050