Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Global Mean Accessibility in Metropolitan Areas.Case Study:Chinchina, Colombia


Affiliations
1 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Manizales, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil, Colombia
2 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogota, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil y Agrícola, Colombia
 

Objectives: To evaluate the alternatives of connection to the Metropolitan Area owned by the municipality of Chinchiná, Colombia: the Metropolitan Area of the Center-West (AMCO) and the Metropolitan Area of the Center-South Region (AMRCS). Methods / Statistical Analysis: A global mean accessibility analysis for different scenarios (Chinchiná as part of the AMCO and AMRCS, and a large region that sums both metropolitan areas) is used to determine which option generates greater benefits to the municipality of Chinchiná in terms of regional mobility. Besides, Kriging model is used to the geostatiscal analysis and building the accessibility isochrones curves. Findings: The results showed that Chinchiná has the best geographical location in terms of global mean accessibility of the study area, corresponding to eight municipalities and two departments because it can be accessed in less than 60 min to all municipalities presents in AMRCS and less than 50 min to all municipalities presents in AMCO. Application / Improvement: The global mean accessibility as a tool to determinate the average travel time in Metropolitan Areas and the benefits fot new municipalities.
User

  • Borja J. Informe Sobre La Gobernabilidad De Las Areas Metropolitanas En El Mundo. Urban Technology Consulting. 2004; p.1–150.
  • Feria-Torbio JM. La delimitacion y organizacion espacial de las areas metropolitanas espa-olas: una perspectiva desde la movilidad residencia-trabajo. Ciudad y Territorio. Estudios Territoriales. 2010, 164, pp. 189–210.
  • Lefevre C. The improbable metropolis: Decentralization, local democracy and metropolitan areas in the Western world. Análise Social. 2010; 45(197):623–37.
  • Ley 1625. Diario oficial No. 48776 de la Republica de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. 2013 April 29. Available from: Crossref.
  • Cadena D. Conurbación y áreas metropolitanas en el derecho Colombiano. Derecho y Realidad. 2008; 2(11):49–62.
  • Preciado Beltran J. Bogotá region: Crecimiento urbano en la consolidacion del territorio metropolitano. Universidad Distrital Fransisco José de Caldas. 2005; p.1–18.
  • Alcaldía de Chinchina. Información General. Chinchina, Caldas. 2018 April 19. Available from: Crossref.
  • Arango O. El Area Metropolitana Centro-Occidente antecedentes y perspectivas. Revista de Ciencias Humanas. 2004; 10(33):119–36.
  • A Chinchina le suena el area metropolitana del Centro-Occidente, Pereira, Risaralda. 2017 March 01. Available from: Crossref.
  • Jimenez LF. Motivacion para la constitucion del area metropolitana de la region centro-sur de Caldas. Escuela Superior de Administracion Publica. 2006; p.1–62. PMCid:PMC1343545
  • Chinchiná al AMCO, ya se habla de consulta popular. 2017 March 18. Available from: Retrieved from: Crossref.
  • Proyecciones de poblacion total por sexo y grupos de edad de 0 hasta 80 y mas a-os (2005 - 2020). 2018 April 27. Available from: Crossref.
  • Hansen WG. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1959; 25(2):73–6. Crossref
  • Goodchild MF. Theoretical Geography. In: Bunge W, Human Geography. 1962.
  • Ingram DR. The Concept of Accessibility: A search for an operational form. Regional Studies. 1971; 5(2):101–7. Crossref
  • Dalvi MQ. Behavioural modelling accessibility, mobility and need: concepts and measurement. Behavioural travel modelling. 1978; p.639–53.
  • Geurs KT, Ritsema van Eck JR. Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact. RIVM rapport 408505006. 2001; p.1–265.
  • Geurs KT, van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography. 2004; 12(2):127–40. Crossref
  • Escobar D, García F. Impacto regional: caso de aplicacion de analisis de accesibilidad territorial. Revista Épsilon. 2012; 18(1988):71–86.
  • Pirie GH. Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal. Environment and Planning A. 1979; 11(3):299–312. Crossref
  • Karou S, Hull A. Accessibility modelling: Predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK. Journal of Transport Geography. 2014; 35:1–11. Crossref
  • Akinbola KB, Md Yassin A, Olajide SE. Assessing the Strength of Sladecom as a Model for Improved Formal Accessibility of Urban Lands in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 9(46):1–8. Crossref
  • Talavera-García R, Valenzuela-Montes LM. La accesibilidad peatonal en la integración espacial de las paradas de transporte público. Bitacora Urbano Territorial. 2012; 21(2):97–109.
  • Gulhan G, Ceylan H, Ozuysal M, Ceylan H. Impact of utility-based accessibility measures on urban public transportation planning: A case study of Denizli, Turkey. Cities. 2013; 32:102–12. Crossref
  • Escobar D, García F, Tolosa R. Análisis de accesibilidad territorial a nivel regional. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Ingeniería Y Arquitectura, Manizales. 2013.
  • Talpur MAH, Chandio IA, Memon IA, Napiah M. A Brief Review on the Role of Regional Transport Accessibility in the Development Process of Distant Sub-Regions. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 9(13):1–9. Crossref
  • Montoya J, Escobar D, Sabogal O. Donde ubicar nuevos nodos comerciales en la ciudad de Manizales – Colombia ? Aplicacion de un analisis geográfico. Revista Espacios. 2017; 38(53):7–18.
  • Cheng J, Bertolini L. Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity. Journal of Transport Geography. 2013; 30:100–9. Crossref
  • Sanchez TW, Shen Q, Peng ZR. Transit mobility, jobs access and low-income labour participation in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies. 2004; 41(7):1313–31. Crossref
  • Foth N, Manaugh K, El-Geneidy AM. Towards equitable transit: Examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996-2006. Journal of Transport Geography. 2013; 29:1–10. Crossref
  • Geurs KT, Boon W, Van Wee B. Social impacts of transport: literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transport Reviews. 2009; 29(1):69–90. Crossref
  • Allen WB, Liu D, Singer S. Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Part B. 1993; 27(6): 439–49. Crossref
  • Saghapour T, Moridpour S, Thompson RG. Public transport accessibility in metropolitan areas: A new approach incorporating population density. Journal of Transport Geography. 2016; 54:273–85. Crossref
  • Rajewski Z. Gross Domestic Product. Eastern European Economics. 1994; 32(4):71–80. Crossref
  • Perilla DJ, Escobar DA, Cardona S. New Transportation Infrastructure Impact in Terms of Global Average Access- Intersection “La Carola” Manizales (Colombia) Case Study. Contemporary Engineering Sciences. 2018; 11(5):215–27. Crossref
  • Loaiza CM, Holguín JM, Escobar D. Análisis comparativo de alternativas viales entre Manizales y Mariquita (Colombia) a través de un estudio de accesibilidad territorial. Informacion Tecnologica. 2016; 27(5):231–42. Crossref
  • Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerical Mathematics. 1959; 1(1):269–71. Crossref
  • Wu Q, Qin G, Li H. An Improved Dijkstra’s algorithm application to multi-core processors, Metallurgical and Mining Industry. 2015; 9:76–81.
  • Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte J, Mistree F. Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA Journal. 2001; 39(12):2233–41. Crossref Crossref
  • Matheron G. Principles of geostatistics. Economic geology. 1963; 58(8):1246–66. Crossref
  • Lindner A, Pitombo CS, Rocha SS, Quintanilha JA. Estimation of transit trip production using Factorial Kriging with External Drift: an aggregated data case study. Geo-Spatial Information Science. 2016; 19(4):245–54. Crossref
  • Prasetiyowati S. suryani, Imrona M, Ummah I, Sibaroni Y. Prediction of Public Transportation Occupation Based on Several Crowd Spots Using Ordinary Kriging Method. Journal of Innovative Technology and Education 2016; 3(1):93–104. Crossref

Abstract Views: 229

PDF Views: 0




  • Global Mean Accessibility in Metropolitan Areas.Case Study:Chinchina, Colombia

Abstract Views: 229  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Diego Alexander Escobar
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Manizales, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil, Colombia
Santiago Cardona Urrea
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Manizales, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil, Colombia
Carlos Alberto Moncada
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogota, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil y Agrícola, Colombia

Abstract


Objectives: To evaluate the alternatives of connection to the Metropolitan Area owned by the municipality of Chinchiná, Colombia: the Metropolitan Area of the Center-West (AMCO) and the Metropolitan Area of the Center-South Region (AMRCS). Methods / Statistical Analysis: A global mean accessibility analysis for different scenarios (Chinchiná as part of the AMCO and AMRCS, and a large region that sums both metropolitan areas) is used to determine which option generates greater benefits to the municipality of Chinchiná in terms of regional mobility. Besides, Kriging model is used to the geostatiscal analysis and building the accessibility isochrones curves. Findings: The results showed that Chinchiná has the best geographical location in terms of global mean accessibility of the study area, corresponding to eight municipalities and two departments because it can be accessed in less than 60 min to all municipalities presents in AMRCS and less than 50 min to all municipalities presents in AMCO. Application / Improvement: The global mean accessibility as a tool to determinate the average travel time in Metropolitan Areas and the benefits fot new municipalities.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2018%2Fv11i21%2F123113