Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Social Exclusion Related to Mobility in Villavicencio from a Gender Perspective


Affiliations
1 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogota, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil y Agrícola, Colombia
2 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Manizales, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil, Colombia
 

Objectives: This research analyzes daily social exclusion related to mobility from a gender perspective in Villavicencio City to find the inequalities between men and women and propose guidelines to diminish it. Methods/Analysis: This research uses quantitative and qualitative methods: quantitative by doing regressions with information from a mobility survey (2012) to find the broad situation of the objective and qualitative by doing gender separated focus groups to make an in-depth analysis based on findings of the quantitative methods and Church exclusion dimensions. Findings: Authors find that in Villavicencio men and women have different experiences of social exclusion related to mobility. Findings show that women are significantly more impacted by mobility: number of trips depending on strata, age and gender, as well as differences on the means and motives of transport depending on whether they are male or female. Finally, the role that society has established for women in relation to the care of others has created the concept “Mobility of care”, which is being ignored by decision makers and is aggravating the daily mobility-related social exclusion for women. The relation of mobility with the urban spaces and the occupation of it by the women and their people in care in Villavicencio is the reason it happens here. Application/Improvements: Latin-American cities must plan their mobility using mixed methods to understand the problems of all the population, seeking to include gender perspectives since women are more negatively affected by daily social exclusion related to mobility.
User

  • Lucas K. Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy. 2012; 20:105–13. Crossref.
  • Jiron P, Lange C, Bertrand M. Exclusion y desigualdadespacial: Retratodesde la movilidadcotidiana. Invi. 2010; 25(68):15–57.
  • Davila JD. Movilidad Urbana y Pobreza. Aprendizajes de Medellin y Soacha, Colombia. The Development Planning Unit, UCL. Facultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellin; 2012. p. 1–24.
  • Leibler L, Musset A. Un transportehacia la justiciaespacial? El caso del metrocable y de la comunanororiental de Medellín, Colombia. Scripta Nova. 2010; 14(331):1–13.
  • Avellaneda P, Cebollada A. Equidad social enmovilidad: Reflexionesentorno a los casos de Barcelona y Lima. Scripta Nova. 2008; 12(270):1–16.
  • Kamruzzaman M, Yigitcanlar T, Yang J, Mohamed MA. Measures of transport-related social exclusion: A critical review of the literature. Sustainability. 2016; 8(7):6–11. Crossref.
  • ALCALDIA DE VILLAVICENCIO - META Unidos Podemos. 2017. Available from: Crossref.
  • DANE. Estimaciones de poblacion 1985–2005 yproyecciones de poblacion 2005–2020 total municipal por area. 2018.
  • MirallesGuasch C, Melo MM, Marquet O. A gender analysis of everyday mobility in urban and rural territories: From challenges to sustainability. Gender, Place and Culture. 2016; 23(3):398–417. Crossref.
  • Di Ciommo F, Comendador J, Lopez-Lambas ME, Cherchi E, Ortuzar J. Exploring the role of social capital influence variables on travel behaviour. Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice. 2014; 68:46–55. Crossref.
  • Loukaitou-Sideris A. A gendered view of mobility and transport: Next steps and future directions. Town Planning Review. 2016; 87(5):547–65. Crossref.
  • Bocarejo JP, Portilla IJ, Velasquez JM, Cruz MN, Pena A, Oviedo DR. An innovative transit system and its impact on low income users: The case of the metrocable in Medellin. Journal of Transport Geography. 2014; 39:49–61. Crossref.
  • Cebollada A. Mobility and labour market exclusion in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region. Journal of Transport Geography. 2008; 17(3):226–33. Crossref.
  • Farber S, Paez A. My car, my friends and me: A preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography. 2009; 17(3):216–25. Crossref.
  • Mika Kunieda GA. Genero y TransporteUrbano: Inteligente y Asequible. Gtz. 2007. p. 1–54.
  • El porque de la relacion entre genero y transporte. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Nota Tecnica N°IDB-TN-1124. Available from: Crossref.
  • Hopkins PE. Thinking Critically and Creativel about Focus Groups. Area. 2007; 39(4):528–35. Crossref.
  • Escobar J, Bonilla Jimenez I. Grupos focales: Una guia conceptual y metodologica. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicologia. 2009; 9(1):51–67.
  • Davila J. Movilidad Urbana y Pobreza. Aprendizajes de Medellin y Soacha, Colombia. The Development Planning Unit, UCL. Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellin. 2012.
  • Schwanen T, Lucas K, Akyelken N, CisternasSolsona D, Carrasco JA, Neutens T. Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice. 2015; 74:123–35. Crossref.

Abstract Views: 215

PDF Views: 0




  • Social Exclusion Related to Mobility in Villavicencio from a Gender Perspective

Abstract Views: 215  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Julian Diaz Correa
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogota, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil y Agrícola, Colombia
Carlos Albert Moncada
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogota, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil y Agrícola, Colombia
Diego Alexander Escobar
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Manizales, Departamento de Ingenieria Civil, Colombia

Abstract


Objectives: This research analyzes daily social exclusion related to mobility from a gender perspective in Villavicencio City to find the inequalities between men and women and propose guidelines to diminish it. Methods/Analysis: This research uses quantitative and qualitative methods: quantitative by doing regressions with information from a mobility survey (2012) to find the broad situation of the objective and qualitative by doing gender separated focus groups to make an in-depth analysis based on findings of the quantitative methods and Church exclusion dimensions. Findings: Authors find that in Villavicencio men and women have different experiences of social exclusion related to mobility. Findings show that women are significantly more impacted by mobility: number of trips depending on strata, age and gender, as well as differences on the means and motives of transport depending on whether they are male or female. Finally, the role that society has established for women in relation to the care of others has created the concept “Mobility of care”, which is being ignored by decision makers and is aggravating the daily mobility-related social exclusion for women. The relation of mobility with the urban spaces and the occupation of it by the women and their people in care in Villavicencio is the reason it happens here. Application/Improvements: Latin-American cities must plan their mobility using mixed methods to understand the problems of all the population, seeking to include gender perspectives since women are more negatively affected by daily social exclusion related to mobility.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2018%2Fv11i21%2F123627