Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Framework for Agile Global Software Development:the Case of an International Software Company in Egypt


Affiliations
1 Computer Science Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
 

Objectives: Presenting the results of an Egyptian branch of an international company as a case study. The existing gap in the knowledge types and the impact of the lack interaction was investigated within the structure of the company team. Methods: This study is an exploratory case study. To enhance the data collection process and to answer the study’ questions, the following three phases were performed: interviews, online survey, and interviews. A descriptive statistical analysis and ischolar_main – cause analysis were used to analyze the online survey in quantitative and qualitative attributes and a general framework coding for a thematic analysis to analyze the interviews. Finding: The results explore that: (1) the current structure of the Egyptian branch of an international company case study distributed teams faces an existing gap in the knowledge types (domain, technical, and application). (2) The existing gap in both of domain and technical knowledge leads to a gap in the application knowledge. (3) The lack of using qualified document, recording audio and video meetings between the distributed teams, Co-located practice, wikis (asynchronous tool) besides email, and the yearly planned formal training and training course create ischolar_main causes for the existing knowledge gap. (4) Qualified document is standardized and contains the both test cases and user stories. (5) Recording audio and video meetings between the distributed teams especially in complex project is an excellent feedback. (6) The strategy of the Co-located practice, where the designers (offshore members) travel to collocate with Client engagement team (onshore team) during the requirements document preparing, is preferred by the most participants than the opposite. Application/Improvement: Capturing the existing gap in knowledge types for the agile partial offshoring model will lead to improving this model. Which increase the software quality and decrease delivery time and cost for international software development companies and software development’ clients.
User

  • Sriram R, Mathew SK. Global software development using agile methodologies: A review of literature. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology; 2012. p. 389–93. Crossref.

  • Agerfalk J, Fitzgerald B, In OP. Flexible and distributed software processes: Old petunias in new bowls. Communications of the ACM. 2006; 49(10):27–34.

  • Dumitriu FL, Oprea DU, Mesnita GA. Issues and strategy for agile global software development adoption. Proceeding of the 3rd World Multi conference on Applied Economics, Business and Development; 2011. p. 37–42.

  • Aman A, Nicholson B. Mind the gap! Understanding knowledge in global software teams. Information Technology in the Service Economy: Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century; 2008. p. 321–30.

  • Aman A, Nicholson B. Knowledge management in globally distributed software development teams: Sensemaking challenges. Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe); 2012. p. 63–8.

  • Prikladnicki R, Audy JL, Evaristo R. A reference model for global software development. Proceeding of 5th Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises; 2004 Aug. p. 369–78. Crossref.

  • Jalali S, Wohlin C. Agile practices in global software engineeringA systematic map. Proceeding of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE); 2010 Aug. p. 45–54. Crossref.

  • Holmström H, Fitzgerald B, Ågerfalk PJ, Conchúir EÓ. Agile practices reduce distance in global software development. Information Systems Management. 2006 Dec; 23(3):7–18. Crossref.

  • Ramesh B, Cao L, Mohan K, Xu P. Can distributed software development be agile? Communications of the ACM. 2006 Oct; 49(10):41–6. Crossref.

  • Hossain E, Babar MA, Paik HY, Verner J. Risk identification and mitigation processes for using scrum in global software development: A conceptual framework. Proceedings of 16th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC’09); 2009 Dec. p. 457–64. Crossref.

  • Shrivastava SV, Date H. Distributed agile software development: A review. Journal of Computer Science and Engineering. 2010 May; 1(1):10–17.

  • Kamaruddin NK, Arshad NH, Mohamed A. Chaos issues on communication in agile global software development. Proceedings of the IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC); 2012. p. 394–8. Crossref.

  • Alzoubi YI, Gill AQ. Agile global software development communication challenges: A systematic review. Proceedings of the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information System; 2014. p. 1–13. PMid:25278769 PMCid:PMC4167487

  • Rizvi B, Bagheri E, Gasevic D. A systematic review of distributed Agile software engineering. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 2015 Oct; 27(10):723–62. Crossref.

  • Razzak MA, Ahmed R. Knowledge sharing in distributed agile projects: Techniques, strategies and challenges. IEEE Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems; 2014. p. 1431–40.

  • Dorairaj S, Noble J, Malik P. Knowledge management in distributed agile software development. IEEE Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE); 2012 Aug. p. 64–73. Crossref.

  • Phalnikar R, Deshpande VS, Joshi SD. Applying agile principles for distributed software development. IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Control (ICACC’09); 2009. p. 535–9. Crossref.

  • Manteli C, Van Den Hooff B, Tang A, Van Vliet H. The impact of multi-site software governance on knowledge management. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE); 2012. p. 40–9.

  • Wang X, Maurer F, Morgan R, Oliveira J. Tools for supporting distributed agile project planning. Agility Across Time and Space. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010 May. p. 183–99.

  • Hossain E, Bannerman PL, Jeffery DR. Scrum practices in global software development: a research framework. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 88–102. Crossref.

  • Nilsson CG, Karlsson D. Implementing Agile project methods in globally distributed teams. Master Thesis, Project Management. Karlstad Business School; 2014. p. 1–81.

  • Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. 2nd Edition. USA: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 1–28. PMid:8026640

  • Lacey A, Luff D. Qualitative research analysis. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire and the Humber; 2009. p. 1–46.

  • Guarino N. Understanding, building and using ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 1997; 46(2–3):293–310. Crossref.


Abstract Views: 241

PDF Views: 0




  • A Framework for Agile Global Software Development:the Case of an International Software Company in Egypt

Abstract Views: 241  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Taghreed A. A. Motawi
Computer Science Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Amr Kamel
Computer Science Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Hesham Hassan
Computer Science Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract


Objectives: Presenting the results of an Egyptian branch of an international company as a case study. The existing gap in the knowledge types and the impact of the lack interaction was investigated within the structure of the company team. Methods: This study is an exploratory case study. To enhance the data collection process and to answer the study’ questions, the following three phases were performed: interviews, online survey, and interviews. A descriptive statistical analysis and ischolar_main – cause analysis were used to analyze the online survey in quantitative and qualitative attributes and a general framework coding for a thematic analysis to analyze the interviews. Finding: The results explore that: (1) the current structure of the Egyptian branch of an international company case study distributed teams faces an existing gap in the knowledge types (domain, technical, and application). (2) The existing gap in both of domain and technical knowledge leads to a gap in the application knowledge. (3) The lack of using qualified document, recording audio and video meetings between the distributed teams, Co-located practice, wikis (asynchronous tool) besides email, and the yearly planned formal training and training course create ischolar_main causes for the existing knowledge gap. (4) Qualified document is standardized and contains the both test cases and user stories. (5) Recording audio and video meetings between the distributed teams especially in complex project is an excellent feedback. (6) The strategy of the Co-located practice, where the designers (offshore members) travel to collocate with Client engagement team (onshore team) during the requirements document preparing, is preferred by the most participants than the opposite. Application/Improvement: Capturing the existing gap in knowledge types for the agile partial offshoring model will lead to improving this model. Which increase the software quality and decrease delivery time and cost for international software development companies and software development’ clients.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2018%2Fv11i25%2F127485