Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Notion of School Teacher in Changing Social World:A Narrative Analysis


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A major portion of life period of a person is spent in school premises. During the schooling period a student interacts with teachers and other fellow students. Hence, the present study was undertaken to explore the student's experiences, expectations and conceptualization of school teacher in their life. The data was collected from undergraduate and postgraduate students (n=70) of Department of Psychology, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, individually. These students had written a write up on good and bad teachers in their school life with focus on their look alike, handling of classes, help or constraining in handling schooling pressure, behavior of teachers and student expectations, etc. The narrative analysis was done with focus on thematic and structural type of narrative analysis. The themes that emerged for good teacher included characteristics such as better way of teaching, no discrimination among students, disciplined class, dutiful, care and concern, person with moral values and helping nature. Characteristics of a bad teacher included themes such as insulting student in class, discrimination among students, inappropriate teaching methods, excessive expression of aggression and punishment, pessimistic and inhumane nature, and no respect for others. These findings are very pertinent in developing teacher training modules that what characteristic a student want or don't want in his/her teacher in contemporary world of information overload where the student is not looking to his/her teacher as information provider but as a motherly or fatherly figure who shape them, give emotional support in ups and downs of school pressure.

Keywords

Good Teacher, Bad Teacher, Theme, Narrative Analysis.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akbari, R (2007). Reflections on reflective teaching: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.
  • Akbari, R, Behzadpour, F, & Dadvand. B. (2010). L2 teacher reflection: A construct validation study. Manuscript submitted for publication in. System, 38,211-227.
  • Alexander, C. D., & Fuller, E. (2005). Effects of teacher qualifications on student achievement in middle schooI mathematics in Texas. Paper presented at the Ameriam Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
  • Allinder, R M. (1994). The relationships between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17,86-95.
  • Anderson, R., Greene, M., & Loewen, P. (1988). Relationships among teachers and students thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 148-165.
  • Bainer, O. L., & Cantrell, D. (1991). The relationship between instructional domain and the content of reflection among preservice teacher. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Bandura,A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (p. 145). New York:Cambridge University Press.
  • Bennett, N., Jordan, J., Long, G., & Wade, B. (1976). Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books Publishing Limited.
  • Bjornesen, C. A. (2000). Undergraduate student perceptions of the impact of faculty in activities in education. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 205-208.
  • Black, R. (1993). A match of learning style to teaching style based on use of hemispheric dominance theory to enhance learning of creative thinking skills. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). USA: University of Georgia.
  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Burley, W. W., Hall, B. W., Villeme, M. G, & Brockmeier, L. L. (1991). A path analysis of the mediating role of efficacy in first-year teachers' experiences, reactions, and plans. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Conti, G. J. (1985). The relationship between teaching style and adult student learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 35(4), 220-228.
  • Conti, G, & Welborn, R. (1996). Teaching learning styles and the adult learner. Lifelong Learning, 9(8), 20-24.
  • Cupkie, L. (1990) The effects of similarity of instructor preferred teaching style and student preferred learning style on student achievement in selected courses in a metropolitan community college (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Kansas City.
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Farrell, T. (2003). Reflective teaching: Principles and practice. English Teaching Forum, 41(4), 14-21.
  • Ferguson, R (1998). Teachers perceptions and the black-white test score gap. In C. Jencks and M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 273-317). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-418.
  • Galbraith, M. W. (1999). Philosophy and the instructional process. Adult Learning, 11(2), 11-13.
  • Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching methods and students academic performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(9), 29-35.
  • Garman, N, & Gaynor, A. (1986). An open letter of Thomas J. Sergiovanni. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,2(1),1-24
  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
  • Glickman,C.,& Tamashiro,R (1982). A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving. Psychology in Schools, 19,558-562.
  • Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teachers characteristics. Education Next, 2(1), 50-55.
  • Good, T.L.,& Brophy,J. (2003). Looking in the classroom. Boston-.Allyn and Bacon.
  • Grasha, A. F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42,142-149.
  • Gray, P., & Ross, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvements, 17,179-199.
  • Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 81(1),41-47.
  • Heimlich, J.E.,& Norland,E.(1994). Developing teaching style in adult education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O. C, & Brissie, J. S. (1992). Parent efficacy, teacher efficacy and teacher and parent involvement. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 287-294.
  • Hoy, A. W. (2000). Educational psychology in teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 35,257-270.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27,279-300.
  • Iran-Nejad, A., & Gregg, M. (2001). The brain-mind cycle of reflection. Teachers College Record, 103(5), 868-895.
  • Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Knobloch, N. (2006). Exploring relationships of teachers sense of efficacy in two student teaching programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(2), 36-47.
  • Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge.
  • LaBoskey, V. K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of pre service teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Larson, D. (2007). Self-awareness about teaching style: Development of a tool. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
  • Lowery, N. V. (2003). The fourth R: Reflection. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 23-31.
  • Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Midgley, C, Feldlaufer, H, & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247-258.
  • Miglietti, C. L., & Strange, C. C. (1998). Learning styles, classroom environment preferences, teaching styles, and remedial course outcomes for under prepared adults at a two-year college. Community College Review, 26(1), 1-19.
  • Milrood, R. (1999). A Module for English language teacher trainers. Moscow: British Council.
  • Nolan, J., & Huebner, T. (1989). Nurturing the reflective practitioner through instructional supervision: A review of the literature. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,4(2),126-143.
  • Oyedeji (1998). The supply and demand for technical and vocational teachers in junior secondary schools in K wara state. International journal of educational management, University of Ilorin, Vol. 1.
  • Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pennington, M. C. (1995). The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 705-731.
  • Pultorak, E. G. (1993). Facilitating reflective thought in novice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44,288-295.
  • Riaikhy, C, & Kaur, S. (2009). Corporal punishment and anxiety among school-going adolescents. Indian Journal of Social Work, 70, 27-42.
  • Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26,207-231.
  • Solomon, D., & Kendall, A. J. (1979). Children in classrooms: An investigation of person-environment interaction.New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Stewart, S., & Richardson, B. (2000). Reflection and its place in the curriculum: Should it be assessed? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4),370-380.
  • Snyder, C. R, Lopez, S. J., & Pedrotti, J. T. (2010). Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
  • Waltermire, L. (1999). The Nature, Roles, and Interplay of the Inner and Outer Voices of Reflective Teaching. (Unpublished master's thesis). Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma.
  • Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs and predictors of professional commitment. Journal of Education Research, 100,303-310.
  • Welborn, R (1996). Influences of achievement among non-traditional health professional students. Paper presented at the "Teaching to Potential" Regional Conference on University Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 279258).
  • Wildman, T. M., Niles, J. A., Magliaro, S. G, & McLaughlin, R A. (1990). Promoting reflective practice among beginning and experienced teachers. In R. T. Clift, W. R Houston, and M.C.Pugach (Eds.),Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs (pp. 139-162). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6,137-148.
  • Wright, S. P., Horn, S.P., & Sanders, W.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personal Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.
  • Yang C. (1997). From Dewey legacy to Schon epistemology of practice: Reconceptualizing reflective teacher education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Abstract Views: 263

PDF Views: 0




  • The Notion of School Teacher in Changing Social World:A Narrative Analysis

Abstract Views: 263  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anubhuti Dubey
Department of Psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India
Garima Singh
Department of Psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India

Abstract


A major portion of life period of a person is spent in school premises. During the schooling period a student interacts with teachers and other fellow students. Hence, the present study was undertaken to explore the student's experiences, expectations and conceptualization of school teacher in their life. The data was collected from undergraduate and postgraduate students (n=70) of Department of Psychology, D.D.U. Gorakhpur University, individually. These students had written a write up on good and bad teachers in their school life with focus on their look alike, handling of classes, help or constraining in handling schooling pressure, behavior of teachers and student expectations, etc. The narrative analysis was done with focus on thematic and structural type of narrative analysis. The themes that emerged for good teacher included characteristics such as better way of teaching, no discrimination among students, disciplined class, dutiful, care and concern, person with moral values and helping nature. Characteristics of a bad teacher included themes such as insulting student in class, discrimination among students, inappropriate teaching methods, excessive expression of aggression and punishment, pessimistic and inhumane nature, and no respect for others. These findings are very pertinent in developing teacher training modules that what characteristic a student want or don't want in his/her teacher in contemporary world of information overload where the student is not looking to his/her teacher as information provider but as a motherly or fatherly figure who shape them, give emotional support in ups and downs of school pressure.

Keywords


Good Teacher, Bad Teacher, Theme, Narrative Analysis.

References