International Journal of Education and Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Gender Difference on Individual and Organization Factors:A Study of Private Sector Employees


Affiliations
1 Clinical Psychologist, IIS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Psychology, IIS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The professional front is an important part in an individual's life. Not only his/her individual characteristics but also the common original factors play a major role in the professional experience of a person. The present study aims to explore the gender differences if any on the both individual factors (Job satisfaction, Work attitude, Role stress, Job performance) and organizational factors (Work culture & Organizational commitment). A sample of 100 private sector employees was selected. Atwo-group research design employed. Tools of the study were gender Role stress (Pareek, 1993); Organizational commitment (Shawkat & Ansari, 2001); Job satisfaction (Macdonald & Maclntyre, 1997); Job attitude (Srivastava, 1999); Organizational culture (Pareek, 2002); Job performance (Goodman & Svyantek, 1999). T-test was computed further a correlation analysis was also employed. Outcome of the study revealed that females experience high-level of stress as compare to the males. A significant and positive correlation was found between Organizational culture and Job satisfaction, Job Performance and Job satisfaction, Job performance and Organizational culture and Role stress and Job attitude. It can be concluded that both individual and organizational factors interaction and affect each other and play a significant role in the experience of professional life. If proper interventions are planned and implemented they will lead to a positive professional experience and better and healthier organizations.

Keywords

Work Culture, Job Satisfaction, Work Attitude, Role Stress, Job Performance, Organizational Commitment.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Arnett, Z.A., Laverie, U.I., & McLanes, E.T. (2002). Pay satisfaction and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 613-640.

  • Borman, W., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. InN. SchmittandW. Borman(Eds.),Perao««e/ selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Campbell, J. P, McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In E. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, and Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organisations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Campbell, J. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. Dunnette and L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 686-707). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Chaturvedi, V. (2011). A study on gender difference with relation to occupational stress among faculties in management college of private and government institutes A study with reference to management colleges in NCR. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 2(2), 168-172.

  • Claver, E., Llopis, J., Gonzalez, M.R., & Gasco, J.L. (2001). The performance of information systems through organizational culture. Information Technology and People, 14(3) ,247-260.

  • Cole, L. E., & Cole, M. S. (2005). Employee satisfaction and organisational performance: A summary of key findings from applied psychology. http://www.Teammax.net/files/LiteratureReview.pdf

  • Cooper, C, Dewe, M., & Driscoll, O. (2001). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. CA.

  • Colquit, P., & Wesson, L. (2009). Organizational behavior. New York: Mc Craw Hill.

  • Colquit, J.A., Lepine, J.A., & Wesson, MJ. (2011). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace. New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin. International Edition.

  • Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization theory and design. Singapore: Info Access and Distribution Ltd.

  • Gallup U.S. (2011). Job satisfaction struggles to recover to 2008 levels. Elizabeth Mendes:May31.

  • Goodman, S., & Svyantek, D. (1999). Person organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254-275.

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.

  • Hollingworth, C, Mathews, G., & Hartnett, O. (1988). Job satisfaction and mood: An exploratory study. Work and Stress, 2, 225-232.

  • Jason, A. C, Jeffery, A. L., & Michael, J. W. (2009). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in theworkplace. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 107-108.

  • Judge, T.A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J.D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 341-367. PMID 22129457. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511

  • Job Attitude and Employees Performance of Public Sector Organizations in Jaffna District,Sri Lanka (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232273185_Job_Attitude_and_Employees_Performance_of_Public_Sector_Organizations_in_Jaffna_DistrictSri_Lanka [accessed Jun 17,2017].

  • Kahn, R.L., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd. ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571- 650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Kotter, J. (2012). Corporate performance. New York: FreePress.

  • Kotter, J.P, & Hasket, S. L.(1997). Corporate culture and performance. PT Prenhallindo Simon and Schuster (Asia) Pte Ltd, Jakarta. Lawler

  • Keller, R. T . (1975). Role conflict and ambiguity: Correlates with job satisfaction and values. Personnel Psychology, 28, 57-64.

  • Kinicki, A. J., Schriesheim, C. A., McKee, F. M., & Carson, K. P. (2002). Assessing the construct validity of the job disruptive index: Areview and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psycho logy, 57(1), 14-32.

  • Landry,F. J. (1989). Psychology of work behaviour. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

  • Lambert, V., & Lambert, C. (2001). Literature review of role stress/strainonnurses: An international perspective. Nursing and Health Science, 3(1), 161-172.

  • Locke, E. A. (1976 a). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 1297-1350.

  • Locke, E. A. (1976 b). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago: RandMcNally.

  • Luthans, F., Baack, D., & Taylor, L. (1987). Organizational commitment: Analysis of antecedents. Human Relation, 40(4), 219-236.

  • Mabasa, F.D., & Ngirande, H. (2015). Perceived organisational support influences on job satisfaction and organisational commitment among junior academic staff members. Journal ofPsychology in Africa, 25(4), 364-366.

  • Martin, J., &Siehl, C. (1990). Organizational culture: Akey to financial performance. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 241 281). San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • McKinnon, J., Harrison, G., & Wu, A. (2003). Association with commitment, job satisfaction, propensity to remain, and information sharing in Taiwan. International Journal of Business Studies, 77(1), 25-44.

  • Meyer, J.P, Allen, N.J., & Gellatly, I.R. (1990) Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time laggedrelations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 710-720.

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.

  • Motowidlo, S., & Borman, W., & Schmidt, N. (1997). Atheory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.

  • Mottaz, C. J. (1988). Determinants of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 41(6), 467-482.

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Streets, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic press.

  • Mathis,R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2009). Human resource management. Mason, OH, USA: South-Western Cengage Learning.

  • Masterson, I. (1980). Stress atwork: A managerialperspective. New York: Human Press Inc.

  • Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 1(1), 81-89.

  • Macdonald, S., & Maclntyre, P. (1997). The Generic Job Satisfaction Scale: Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13(2), 1-16.

  • Newstrom, W. J., & Davis, K. (2001). Organizational behavior, Human behaviour at work. Tate McGraw-Hill publishing company Limited, p. 256.

  • Pattanayak,B. (1998). CorporateHRD. New Delhi: ExcelBooks.

  • Platsidou, M., & Diamantopoulou, G. (2009). Job satisfaction of Greek university professors: Is it affected by demographic factors, academic rank and problem of higher education? In G. K. Zarifis (Eds.), Educating the adult educators: Quality provision and assessment in Europe, conference proceedings (pp. 535-545). Thessaloniki: Grafima Publications.

  • Pareek,U. (2002). Training Instruments in HRD and OD. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, Second Edition, 545-546.

  • Pareek,U. ( 1983). Organizational role Stress Scale. ORS ScaleBooklet, Answer Sheet andManual.Ahmedabad:Navin Publications.

  • Qaisar, M. U., Rehman, M.S., & Suffyan, M. (2012). Exploring effects of organizational commitment on employee performance: Implications for human resource strategy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 3, 248-255.

  • Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organisational behaviour: global and Southern African perspectives. Cape Town, Pearson Education South Africa.

  • Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). San Diego: Prentice-Hall Inc.

  • Sabri, P. S. U., Ilyas, M., & Amjad, Z. (2011). Organizational culture and its impact on the job satisfaction of the University teachers of Lahore. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(24), 121-128.

  • Sabharwal, M., & Corley, E. A. (2009). Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline. The Social Science Journal, 46, 539-556.

  • Sackmanns, S. A., & Bertelsmann, S. (2006). Success factor corporate culture. Developing a corporate culture for high performance and long term competitiveness. six best practices. Kinndle Edition.

  • Selye, H. (1975). Stress without distress. New York, NY: Lippencott and Crowell Publishers.

  • Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Smith, P. C, Kendall, L. M., &Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. RandMcNally, Chicago.

  • Siagian, S. P. (2002). Manajemen SumberDayaManusia. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

  • Subha, I., & Shakeel, A. (2009). Impact of stress on employee productivity, performance and turnover: An important managerial issue. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5, 468-477.

  • Scotter, J. R, Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526-535.

  • Spector,P (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications.

  • Shawkat, S., & Ansari, S.A. (2001). Organizational Commitment Scale. Unpublished Ph. D thesis, A.M.U.,Aligarh.

  • Vandenberghe, C, Panaccio, A., Bentein, K., Mignonac, K., & Roussel, P. (2011). Assessing longitudinal change of and dynamic relationships among role stressors. job attitudes, turn over intention, and well being in neophyte new comers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 652-671.

  • Verma, R., Balhara, Y P. L., & Gupta, C. S. (2011). Gender differences in stress response: Role of developmental and biological determinants. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 20(1), 410.

  • Vroom, V.H. (1967). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Yee, R W., Guo, Y, & Yeung, A. C. (2015). Being close or being happy: The relative impact of work relationship and job satisfaction on service quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 169,391-400. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.021.


Abstract Views: 309

PDF Views: 0




  • Gender Difference on Individual and Organization Factors:A Study of Private Sector Employees

Abstract Views: 309  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Monica Sharma
Clinical Psychologist, IIS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Vagisha Shekhawat
Department of Psychology, IIS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


The professional front is an important part in an individual's life. Not only his/her individual characteristics but also the common original factors play a major role in the professional experience of a person. The present study aims to explore the gender differences if any on the both individual factors (Job satisfaction, Work attitude, Role stress, Job performance) and organizational factors (Work culture & Organizational commitment). A sample of 100 private sector employees was selected. Atwo-group research design employed. Tools of the study were gender Role stress (Pareek, 1993); Organizational commitment (Shawkat & Ansari, 2001); Job satisfaction (Macdonald & Maclntyre, 1997); Job attitude (Srivastava, 1999); Organizational culture (Pareek, 2002); Job performance (Goodman & Svyantek, 1999). T-test was computed further a correlation analysis was also employed. Outcome of the study revealed that females experience high-level of stress as compare to the males. A significant and positive correlation was found between Organizational culture and Job satisfaction, Job Performance and Job satisfaction, Job performance and Organizational culture and Role stress and Job attitude. It can be concluded that both individual and organizational factors interaction and affect each other and play a significant role in the experience of professional life. If proper interventions are planned and implemented they will lead to a positive professional experience and better and healthier organizations.

Keywords


Work Culture, Job Satisfaction, Work Attitude, Role Stress, Job Performance, Organizational Commitment.

References