International Journal of Education and Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Management of Growth (Body Weight & Body Measurements) Under Different Rearing Systems in Murrah Buffalo Heifers


Affiliations
1 CIRB, SUB Campus, Nabha, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Twenty female buffalo heifers of 12-15 months age were selected from the buffalo herd maintained by Buffalo Research Centre, Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lala-lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (LUVAS). The animals were divided into four groups of 5 each on the basis of their nearness to their body weight and age. The experiment was conducted for a period of 120 days (1st February to 31 st May) to compare the effect of two housing systems and two feeding systems were: Tl:Conventional barn+ Hay and concentrate mixture , T2:Conventional barn + Seasonal green fodder and concentrate mixture, T3: Loose housing + Seasonal green fodder and concentrate mixture, T4: Loose housing + Hay and concentrate mixture. Body weight was significantly affected by the housing systems but not by the treatments and feeding systems as there was significant difference in daily weight gains between housing systems, but not between systems of feeding. Body measurements were not affected by all the treatments, housing and feeding systems. With in the limit of the present experiment it can be concluded that loose housing system with hay feeding as per NRC recommendation was better and more comfortable for young growing heifers because they had better growth as compared to the heifers those were kept in conventional barn under green fodder feeding.

Keywords

Hay, Green Fodder, Loose, Barn, Murrah, Buffalo, Heifer.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Antil, I.S. (1988). Influence of special summermanage mental practices on growth, feed and water consumption and behavior of growing buffaloes, kept in loose house M. Sc. Thesis, Deptt. of LPM, HaryanaAgricultural University, Hisar.

  • Bose, A.M., & Thomas, C.K. (1979). Effect of individual calf pens and antibiotic feed additive on the performance of buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 49,419-422.

  • Bouchque, C.V., Fiems, L.O., Cotlyr, B.C., & Buysse, F.X. (1979). The effect of straw bedded loose or tie stall on the performance of finishing bulls. Livestock Production Science, 6,369-378.

  • Chakrabarti, A. (1991). Effect of winter management systems on growth performance of femaleMurrah buffalo calves. M.Y Sc. Thesis, Deptt. of L.P.M., HayanaAgriculture University, Hisar.

  • Chauhan, T.R, Sikka, P., & Gupta, R. (1994). Effect of feeding green berseem and ammoniated wheat/oat straw ad lib. with wheat/barley (grain) on nutrient utilization in growing buffalo heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 64(4), 393-398.

  • Chauhan, T.R, Dahiya, S.S., Gupta, R, Hooda, O.K., Bhardwaj, A., & Punia, B.S. (1999). Effect of extreme cold on voluntary dry matter intake, nutrient utilization some biochemical and physiological parameters in growing buffalo calves. Journal of'Buffalo, 15(2), 133-141.

  • Chauhan, T.R., Rao, K.R, & Gupta, L.R. (2004). Growth potentiality of Murrah buffalo calves under different feeding regimes. Proc. of VII World buffalo congress; Oct. 20-23,2004, Manila, Phillipines. Symp. VII: Nutrition and feeding (in Press).

  • Erb, R.E, Geldin, R.O, Godwin, M.M, Millard, IB, & Murdock, F.R. (1951). Open shed versus conventional houses for dairy calves. Tech. Bull. 3 Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn

  • Fasil, I.N. (1999). Effect ofdifferent rearing system on growth performance ofcrossbred female calves. M.Sc. Thesis, LPM Deptt, Hary ana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  • Gupta, R, Sikka, P, Sengar, S.S, Dahiya, S.S, Chaudhary, U.B, & Mudgal, YD. (1988a). Voluntary intake, growth rate, feed efficiency and some blood parameters in buffalo heifers on urea treated wheat straw based diet. II World buffalo congress at New Delhi, India, P.: 212 (Abstr.).

  • Gupta, R, Sinha, A.P, Gupta, B.S, Srivastava, IP, Verma, A.K, & Maheswari, PK. (1988b). Body measurements and carcass characteristics of growing buffalo calves as influenced by urea/ammonia treated paddy straw feeding. Indian Journal of Animal Health, 27, 73.

  • Gupta, L.R, Juneja, I.J, Om, H, Yadav, R.S, & Grewal, S.S. (2004a). Intake and utilization of nutrients in male buffalo calves in loose and closed house during winter Proc. XI Animal Nutrition Conference, Jabalpur P.: 145 (Abstr.).

  • Hawkins, G.E. (1967). Comparison of group and individual feeding of concentrate to dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 50, 618-628.

  • Jana, D.N, Das, N, & Nautiyal, L.P. (1989). Study on the effect of different systems of housing and exercise on growth and reproduction in cross bred heifers. Indian Veterinary Journal, 66, 1047-1050.

  • Jat, RP (2002). Effect of roof modifications in loose house for buffalo calves during rainy and winter seasons. Ph.D. Thesis, CCS HaryanaAgricultural University, Hisar.

  • Jat, R.P, Gupta, L.R, Yadav, R.S, & Grewal, S.S. (2003a). Shelter management practices to improve the growth rate in buffalo calves during summer. Proc. 4th Asian Buffalo Congress, NewDelhi. P.: 182 (Abstr.).

  • Karki, D.B. (1981). Effect of mode of housing during winter on growth, physiological and blood parameters of buffalo calves. M.Sc. Thesis, LPM Deptt, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  • Karki, D.B, Singh, M.P, Sastry, N.S.R, & Grewal, S.S. (1983). Summer housing for buffalo heifer calves, micro-climatic condition in houses and their effect on growth parameters. Indian Journal of 'AnimalSciences, 53(1), 1079-1083.

  • Kromann, RP, Finbner, M.D, & Sharp, J.E. (1971). Group feeding vs individual feeding of ambs. Journal of Animal Science, 32, 549-553.

  • Kumar, N, Singh, VB, & Verma, D.N. (1981). Effect of different level of dietary protein and energy on growth of male buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 15, 513-517.

  • Kumar, S, Juneja, I.J, & Dahiya, P. (1999). Effect of feeding and management on the growth performance of Murrah buffalo heifers. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 69(1), 52.

  • Labande, G, Beauchmin, K, & Fehmy, M.H. (1980). Anote on performance of Holstein Friesian veal calves raised to weaning individually or in groups. Animal Breeding Abstracts, 48,515.

  • Lal,M. (1999). Manipulation of'rumen fermentation pattern foroptimization of growth, nutrient utilization and carcass charactersitics in male buffalo calves. Ph.D. Thesis. Dr. B.R Ambedkar Uni. Agra in Animal Husbandry and dairying (A.N.), Deptt. of Anim. Sci, CoAgri,Bichpuri,Agra(U.P)

  • Maatje,K, &Verhoeff, J. (1993). Automated feeding ofmilkreplacer and health control of group housed veal calves. Dairy Science Abstracts, 55, 10.

  • Mehla, O.P (1982). Effect of mode of housing during winter on growth and some physiological parameter of buffalo calves. M. Sc. Thesis, Deptt. of LPM, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  • Nandra, K.S, Gupta, B.K, & Chopra, A.K. (1982). A note on berseem hay as a replacement of concentrate mixture in the rations of cross-bred calves. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 52, 56.

  • Pathak, N.N, & Ranjhan, S.K. (1976). A preliminary study on the effect of ad-lib urea molasses liquid feeding with restricted oat forage and fish meal on the performance of'buffalo calves. Indian Journal of AnimalSciences, 46, 323

  • Pradhan, B, & Sastry, N.S.R. (1988). Feed utilization and blood metabolite levels in growing buffalo heifers fed wheat straw in different ways in different seasons. II World buffalo congress at N. Delhi, India, P.: 227 (Abstr.)

  • Prasad, S, Tripathi, VN, & Tomer, O.S. (1986). Effect of different type of housing management on growth rate and feed efficiency of cross bred calves during winter. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 2, 6-118.

  • Sastry, N.S.R, Yadav, RS, Sharma, VB, & Juneja, I.J. (1981). Influence of type of floor and individual versus group housing on growth and parasitic load and some other aspects of Murrah buffalo heifers. HaryanaAgricultural University Journal of Research, 11,452-457.

  • Sarma, N.K. (1991). Effect of manage mental regimes on growth performance of female Murrah buffalo calves. Ph. D. Thesis, College of Animal Sciences, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  • Sastry, N.S.R, & Georgie, G.C. (1988). Present status of knowledge on housing buffaloes. Indian Journal of AnimalProduction andManagement, 4(3-4), 202-218.

  • Shenu, T (2000). Effect of manage mental regimes on growth performance of female cross bred calves. M.Sc. Thesis, College of Animal Sciences, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  • Sims, J.A, Levenbarger, J.M, & Reaves, J.M. (1972). Feeding act young dairy bulls for beef'. Journal of Dairy Science, 55, 686-692.

  • Singh, M.P. (1982). Effect of different housing conditions during summer and winter season on feed utilization and water intake by growing female buffalo calves. Ph. D. Thesis, HaryanaAgricultural University, Hisar.

  • Singh, M.P, Mehla, O.P, Karki, D.B, Singh, R.A, & Sastry, N.S.R. (1985b). Effect of three systems of housing on utilization of feed for growth and water consumption of buffalo calves in semi arid regions of India. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 1, 109-115.

  • Singh, R, Singh, D. N, & Yadav, R.S. ( 2014). Growth performance and feed intake of buffalo heifers under different housing system during winter season. International JoumalofScimce,Environmmt, 3(1),314-319.lSSN227S-36S7(0)andTechnoogy.

  • Snedecor, G.W, & Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical method (6th ed.). Oxford and IBH Publ. Co, Calcutta.

  • Srivastava, S.K, Ranjahn, S.K, & Pathak, N.N. (1979). Effect of feeding all roughage ration during the early life on growth, utilization of nutrients and feed conversion efficiency in cross bred calves (Bos indicus x Bas taurus). Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 49(1),499-503.

  • Stoikov, P, &Florova, I. (1998). The effect of different variants of open grounds on the physiological status of fattening calves. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, 68, 2513.

  • Turner, P. J. (1977). Post weaning comparison of individually penned and group penned calves. Exp Husband, 33, 24-77.

  • Warnich, VD, Aravo, C.W, & Mickelsen, C.H. (1977). Effect of group individual and isolated rearing of calves on weight gain and behaviour. Journal of Dairy Science, 60,947-953.

  • Yadav, RS. (1984). Effect of three rearing systems on growth performance of female buffalo calves. Ph. D. Thesis, HaryanaAgricultural University, Hisar.

  • Yadav, J.L, & Gupta, L.R. (1985b). Effect of different housing systems on the production ofbuffaloes during summer. Indian of Journal of Dairy Science, 38(4), 245-259.

  • Yanatov, E.V (1973). The effect of tethering and not tethering on the growth and development of Black pied breeding heifers. Animal Breeding Abstracts, 41, 3797'.


Abstract Views: 311

PDF Views: 0




  • Management of Growth (Body Weight & Body Measurements) Under Different Rearing Systems in Murrah Buffalo Heifers

Abstract Views: 311  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ashwani Saini
CIRB, SUB Campus, Nabha, Punjab, India

Abstract


Twenty female buffalo heifers of 12-15 months age were selected from the buffalo herd maintained by Buffalo Research Centre, Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lala-lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar (LUVAS). The animals were divided into four groups of 5 each on the basis of their nearness to their body weight and age. The experiment was conducted for a period of 120 days (1st February to 31 st May) to compare the effect of two housing systems and two feeding systems were: Tl:Conventional barn+ Hay and concentrate mixture , T2:Conventional barn + Seasonal green fodder and concentrate mixture, T3: Loose housing + Seasonal green fodder and concentrate mixture, T4: Loose housing + Hay and concentrate mixture. Body weight was significantly affected by the housing systems but not by the treatments and feeding systems as there was significant difference in daily weight gains between housing systems, but not between systems of feeding. Body measurements were not affected by all the treatments, housing and feeding systems. With in the limit of the present experiment it can be concluded that loose housing system with hay feeding as per NRC recommendation was better and more comfortable for young growing heifers because they had better growth as compared to the heifers those were kept in conventional barn under green fodder feeding.

Keywords


Hay, Green Fodder, Loose, Barn, Murrah, Buffalo, Heifer.

References