International Journal of Education and Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perceived Constraints Related to Inputs and Production by Direct Seeded Rice Growers in Kurukshetra District


Affiliations
1 Department of Sociology, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Direct seeded rice (DSR), most likely older method of crop establishment, is gaining popularity because of its low-input demand. It offers certain advantages i.e. it saves labour, requires less water, less drudgery, early crop maturity, low production cost, better soil physical conditions for following crops and less methane emission, provides better option to be the best fit in different cropping systems. Comparative yields in DSR can be obtained by adopting various cultural practices like, selection of suitable cultivars, proper sowing time, optimum seed rate, proper weed and water management. It can also be stated that soil problems related to rice and following crops can be solved with direct seeding. There are several constraints associated with shift from PTR to DSR, such as high weed infestation, evolution of weedy rice, increase in soil borne pathogens, nutrient disorders, poor crop establishment, lodging, incidence of blast, brown leaf spot etc. By overcoming these constraints DSR can prove to be a very promising, technically and economically feasible alternative to PTR. The contextual matrix and constraints associated with adoption of DSR are discussed in this paper. The study was conducted in Kurukshetra district of Haryana state. From this district, two blocks namely Thanesar and Pehowa were selected randomly. The data presented that constraints regarding input and marketing perceived by respondents was high cost of seed and 'lack of marketing facilities in village1 ranked first constraint, respectively

Keywords

Direct Seeded Rice, Low-Input Demand, Comparative Yields, Constraints.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bonman, J.M., & Leung, H. (2004). Breeding for durable resistance to rice blast disease-dream or reality? Phytopathology, 93, S113. Publication No. P-2003-0110-SSA. American Phytopathological Society Annual Meeting.

  • Chatterjee, D., Kumar, R, Kuotsu, R., & Deka, B.C. (2016).Validation of traditional weed control method through common salt application in hill region of Nagaland. Current Science, 110(8), 1159-1167. doi: 10.18520/cs/vll0/i8/1459-1467

  • Chauhan, B.S., & Johnson, D.E. (2011). Growth response of direct seeded rice to oxadiazon and bispyribac-sodium in aerobic and saturated soils. Weed Science, 59, 119-122.

  • Jacob, G., Menon, M.V., & Abraham, C.T. (2014). Comparative efficacy of new herbicides in direct seeded rice. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 52, 174-177.

  • Javier, F.E., Furuya, S., Soriano, R., & Garcia, F. (2005). Management of wet direct seeded rice. II: weed control by water and herbicides. Philipines Journal of Crop Sciences, 30, 11-17.

  • Kaur, J., & Singh, A. (2017). Direct seeded rice: Prospects, problems/constraints and researchable issues in India. Current Agriculture Research, 5, Issue 1.

  • Kumar, A., Nayak, A.K., Mohanty, S., & Das, B.S. (2016c). Greenhouse gas emission from direct seeded paddy fields under different soil water potentials in Eastern India. AgricultureEnvironmentandEcosystems, 228, 111- 123.

  • Ladha, J. K., Kumar, V., Alam, M. M., Sharma, S., Gathala, M., Chandna, P., Saharawat, Y. S., & Balasubramanian, V. (2009). Integrating crop and resource management technologies for enhanced productivity, profitability, and sustainability of the rice-wheat system in South Asia. "Integrated Crop and Resource Management in the Rice Wheat System of South Asia.

  • Mandal, D., Kumar, R, Singh, D., & Kumar, P. (2011a). Growth and yield of direct seeded rice as affected by sowing date and weed management methods. International Journal of Bio Resource and Stress Management, 2(3), 273-276.

  • Mandal, D., Singh, D., Kumar, R., Kumari, A., & Kumar, V. (2011b). Production potential and economics of direct seeded rice as affected by sowing date and weed maneigementmethods.Indian JournalofWeedSciences, 43(3-4), 139-144.

  • Roy, D.K., Kumar, R., & Kumar, A. (2011). Production potentiality and sustainability of rice based cropping sequences under flood prone situation of North Bihar. Oryza, 48(1),47-51.

  • Singh, G., Dhillon, G., & Romana, G.S. (2016). Direct seeded rice: Potential and constraints in Punjab. Indian Journal ofEconomics and Development, 12(A), 775-780.

  • Satyanarayana, A. (2005). System of rice intensification an innovative method to produce more with less water and inputs. "Paper presented in fourth IWMI-Tata annual part-ners'meet IRMA, Anand, India, February 24-26.

  • Singh, S., Singh, G, Singh, V.P, & Singh, A.P (2005). Effect of establishment methods and weed management practices on weeds and rice in rice-wheat cropping system. Indian Journal of Weed Sciences, 37, 51-57.

  • Sinha, S. K., & Talati, J. (2007). Productivity impacts of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): A case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management, 57(l),55-60.

  • Vijayakumar, M., Ramesh, S., Chandrasekaran,B., &Thiyagarajan, T M. (2006). Effect of System of Rice intensi fication (SRI) Practices on yield attributes, yield and water productivity of rice. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 2(6), 236-242.


Abstract Views: 258

PDF Views: 0




  • Perceived Constraints Related to Inputs and Production by Direct Seeded Rice Growers in Kurukshetra District

Abstract Views: 258  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jatesh Kathpalia
Department of Sociology, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana, India
Rashmi Tyagi
Department of Sociology, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana, India
Vinod Kumari
Department of Sociology, CCS HAU, Hisar, Haryana, India

Abstract


Direct seeded rice (DSR), most likely older method of crop establishment, is gaining popularity because of its low-input demand. It offers certain advantages i.e. it saves labour, requires less water, less drudgery, early crop maturity, low production cost, better soil physical conditions for following crops and less methane emission, provides better option to be the best fit in different cropping systems. Comparative yields in DSR can be obtained by adopting various cultural practices like, selection of suitable cultivars, proper sowing time, optimum seed rate, proper weed and water management. It can also be stated that soil problems related to rice and following crops can be solved with direct seeding. There are several constraints associated with shift from PTR to DSR, such as high weed infestation, evolution of weedy rice, increase in soil borne pathogens, nutrient disorders, poor crop establishment, lodging, incidence of blast, brown leaf spot etc. By overcoming these constraints DSR can prove to be a very promising, technically and economically feasible alternative to PTR. The contextual matrix and constraints associated with adoption of DSR are discussed in this paper. The study was conducted in Kurukshetra district of Haryana state. From this district, two blocks namely Thanesar and Pehowa were selected randomly. The data presented that constraints regarding input and marketing perceived by respondents was high cost of seed and 'lack of marketing facilities in village1 ranked first constraint, respectively

Keywords


Direct Seeded Rice, Low-Input Demand, Comparative Yields, Constraints.

References