International Journal of Education and Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Chronotype and Career Status of Couples on Occupational Stress


Affiliations
1 School of Studies in Psychology, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of the present study was conducted to see the effect of Chronotype and Career Status of Couples on Occupational Stress. Following the disproportional random sampling technique 100 male subjects were selected from considering two characteristics of population, Chronotype (Morning active, Afternoon active, & Evening active) and Career Status (single & dual career status. To assess the Chronotype of the subjects Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (Horn & Ostberg, 1976) was used and to measure Occupational Stress the Occupational Stress Index (OSI) (Shrivastava & Singh, 1984) was used. ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The results indicate that chronotype and career status of couples generate significant effect upon occupational stress of subjects. Occupational Stress of the Ss with Morningness Preference was lower than the Occupational Stress of the Ss with Eveningness Preference. Dual career couples have shown higher Occupational Stress than the Single career couples. No interactional effects of these two factors were found. Therefore, it may be concluded that the career status of couples and morningness-eveningness preference independently generate variance upon Occupational Stress.

Keywords

Occupational Stress, Chronotype, Career Status of Couples.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Achilles, G.M., & Goorgian, M. (2003). Individual difference in morningness-eveningness and patterns of psychological functioning, social adaptation and family stress. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Science and Engineering, 64, 6-B.

  • Adams, G.A., King, L.A., & King, D.W. (1996). Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction. Journalof'AppliedPsychology, 81 (4), 411-420.

  • Adan, A., & Almirall, H. (1991). Home and ostberg morningness eveningness questionnaires: AReduced Scale. Personality and Individual Difference, 12, 241 -253.

  • Antoniou,A.S.,Polychoroni,F.,&Vlachakis,A.N. (2006). Gender and age difference in occupational stress and professional burnout between primary and high school teachers in Greece. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(7), 682-690.

  • Caci, H., Adan, A., Bhole, P., Natate, V., Pornpitakpan, C, & Tilley, A. (2005). Tran cultural properties of the composite scale of Morningness: The relevance of the "Morning affect" factor. Chronobiology International, 22, 523-540.

  • Caci, H., Robert, P., & Boyer (2004). Novelty seekers and impulsive subjects are low in morningness. European Psychiatry, 19, 79-84.

  • Elloy, D.F., & Smith, C.R. (2003). Patttern of stress, work family conflict, role conflict role ambiguity and overload among dual career and single career couples: An Australian study. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 755(1).55-66.

  • Eby, L. T, Casper, W. L, Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C, & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.

  • Frone, M.R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M.L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65-78.

  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Collins, KM. (2001). Career involvement and family involvement as moderators of relationships between work-family conflict and withdrawal fromaprofession. Journalof'OccupationalHealth Psychology, (5(2), 91-100.

  • Jepson, E., & Forrest, S. (2006). Individual contributory factors in teacher stress: The role of achievement striving and occupational commitment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 183-197.

  • Lange, L., & Randal, C. (2011). Morningness-eveningness and behavioural problems in adolescents. Sleep andBiologicalRhythms, 9(1), 12-18.

  • Lu, L., Cooper, C. L.,Kao, S.F, &Zhou, Y. (2003). Work stress, control beliefs and well-being in gender china-an exploration of sub cultural differences between the PRS and Taiwan. JournalofManagerialPsychology, 75(6), 479-510.

  • Mecacci, L., & Rocchetti, G. (1998). Morning and evening type: Stress related personality aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 537-542.

  • Michie, S. (2002). Causes and management of stress at work. Occupational Environment Medicine, 59, 67-72.

  • Mishra, PC. (1995). Job related stress as related to depressed mood at institutions. Paper presented at the 2nd International symposium on cognition and evaluation Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P).

  • Nadeem, M. (2011). A study on occupational stress experienced by private and public banks employees in Querta city. Journals of Business Management in Africa, 5(8).3063-3078.

  • Rehman, H. (2008). Occupational stress and a function area of an organization. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(4), 163-173.

  • Srivastava, A.K. (2000). Management of occupational stress: Theories and practice. New Delhi. India: Gyan Publishing House.

  • Taillard, J., Philip, P., &Bioulac, B. (1999). Morningness-eveningness and the need for sleep. Journal of Sleep Research, 8, 291-295.

  • Thoits, PA. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 101-112.

  • Tiwari, A., & Hasan, B. (2011). A study ofoccupational stress in relation to type of shift work, morningness-eveningness preference and marital adjustment. Ph.D Thesis. Pt. Ravishanker Shukla University, C.G.

  • Vokic, N.P, & Bogdanic, A. (2007). Individual difference and occupational stress perceived: A creation survey. WorkingPaperSeries-Paperno. 07-05.

  • Wills, T.A.O., Connor, D.B., & Smith, L. (2005). The influence of morningness-eveningness on anxiety cardiovascular responses of stress. Physiology and Behavior, 2,125-133.


Abstract Views: 321

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Chronotype and Career Status of Couples on Occupational Stress

Abstract Views: 321  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Swati Mishra
School of Studies in Psychology, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Abstract


The purpose of the present study was conducted to see the effect of Chronotype and Career Status of Couples on Occupational Stress. Following the disproportional random sampling technique 100 male subjects were selected from considering two characteristics of population, Chronotype (Morning active, Afternoon active, & Evening active) and Career Status (single & dual career status. To assess the Chronotype of the subjects Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (Horn & Ostberg, 1976) was used and to measure Occupational Stress the Occupational Stress Index (OSI) (Shrivastava & Singh, 1984) was used. ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The results indicate that chronotype and career status of couples generate significant effect upon occupational stress of subjects. Occupational Stress of the Ss with Morningness Preference was lower than the Occupational Stress of the Ss with Eveningness Preference. Dual career couples have shown higher Occupational Stress than the Single career couples. No interactional effects of these two factors were found. Therefore, it may be concluded that the career status of couples and morningness-eveningness preference independently generate variance upon Occupational Stress.

Keywords


Occupational Stress, Chronotype, Career Status of Couples.

References