Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Assessing the Use of Power Point in a Classroom Setting and its Effectiveness
Subscribe/Renew Journal
This study aims at assessing effective utilization of power point presentation in a classroom setting at Bahir Dar University post graduate diploma in teaching (PGDT) program. For this study, instructors as well as students in the program were selected, interviewed and given open ended questionnaire to 25 students for gathering dependable data. The data obtained clearly showed that the use of power point presentation is totally at risk, i.e. instructors are not using the tool for making it to serve the very purpose it is supposed to be serving regarding to making the instructional process effective, rather it is thought to be, by most instructors, that it makes their tasks accomplished easily. Students have clearly put their concern that the power point technology is not put into effect properly and based on that the participants particularly, student participants gave their own experience based recommendation to the concerned bodies to challenge the power point presentation usage challenges what today's classrooms are facing. Finally, conclusions were made so as to make clear that power point presentation technology must appeal as many senses of students as possible, otherwise, mere utilization of the media for the sake of utilization would never make it effective and effectiveness mean the extent to which the media plays a role for learners to bring changes they are supposed to as a result of using this medium so as to facilitate for better understanding during students' learning. Lastly based on the findings of this study, summary, conclusions and recommendations were forwarded.
Keywords
Power Point Presentation, Multimedia, Instructional Technology, Instructional Practice.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Alster, L. (2002). Power to thepupils: Times educationalsupplement. Retrieved April 23,2003.
- Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.
- Buchholz, S., & Ullman, J. (2004). 12 commandments for power point. 'The ’Teaching Professor, 18(6), 4.
- Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
- Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever. AAHEBulletin, 49(2), 3-6.
- Farkas, D. (2006). Toward a better understanding of power point deck design. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 14(2), 162-171.
- Forsyth, I.R., Jolliffe, A., & Stevens, D. (1995). Delivering a course. London: Kogan.
- Garmston, R. (2000). Ouch! These six slips can bruise and strain a presentation. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 76-77.
- Gordon, T. (2007). Teachingyoung children a second language. Praeger.
- Harrison, A. (1998). Power up, stimulates your students with power point. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(4), 6-9.
- Jones, A.M. (2003). The use and abuse of power point in teaching and learning in the life sciences: Apersonal overview. Health Education Research, 20(4), 423-429.
- Lowry, R.B. (1999). Electronic presentation of lectures effect upon student performance. University Chemistry Education, 3 ,18-21.
- Mason, R , & Hlynka, D. (1998). Power point in the classroom: Where is the power? Educational Technology, 38(5), 42-45.
- Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511816819.004
- Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), ’The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183-200). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511816819.013
- Mayer, R. E. (2009). 'Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mills, R. (2003) Using power point for learning and teaching. LTSN: Bioscience Bulletin, 8, Spring.
- Mottley, J. (2003). Developing self-study materials with power point. LTSN: Bioscience Bulletin, 8 ,7.
- Paivio,A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Stoner, M. (2007). Powerpoint in a new key. Communication Education, 56(3), 354-381.
- Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory fo r multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Szabo, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education, 35, 175-187.
- Tufte,E. (2003 a). The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CN: Graphics Press.
Abstract Views: 235
PDF Views: 0