International Journal of Education and Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluating a Comparative Study of the Nature of Science from Farabi and Moren’s Perspectives and its Implications on Training Sciences


Affiliations
1 Department of Education Science, Shahid University, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Department of Psychology and Education, Herat University, Afghanistan, South Africa
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study purpose is to obtain new educational implications derived from the adaptation of Farabi and Moren votes about science. This study has been done by a comparative procedure and using progressive inference method to discover educational implications. The study explains the findings after explaining the Farabi and Moren general idea, providing the quad questions and expressing the research method. According to these findings, Farabi it has perceived science is based on certainty, equal to value, united with philosophy, and considers and Moren science come from uncertainty with complex entanglements under the criticism of science in the modem world . Farabi and Moren have common opinions through training about the unity of science while multiplicity, the unity of science and philosophy, trans disciplinary training, increasing the authority of the student, and building an ideal society. They also have significant differences in the teleology, the place of logic in science and learning, the type of science unity, and the teleology of science. Significant implications have been provided to design a new educational pattern based on these recognized features of adaptation of the two philosophers' views on the subject of science in the final section. There is a new approach in designing the curriculum among this adaptation, which not only can solve the crises caused by specialization, but also by changing the viewpoint to science nature provide a possibility of synergy between specialists of various sciences from the learning stage.

Keywords

Farabi, Moren, Adaptation, Nature of Science, Unity of Science, Classification of Science, Complexity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ardakani-Referee, R (2010). Farabi the Philosopher of Culture. Tehran: Sokhan Publications.

  • Asgari, Z. (2009). Understanding from the perspective ofMoran and the Koran. Binat Magazine, 6(3), 215-224.

  • Bozreninejad, Y.K.Q. (2014). The position of Shari'a Knowledge in the classification of sciences from the perspective of Farabi, Ghazali, and Khawaja Nasir Toosi. Social Science Quarterly: Social Theories of Muslim ’Thinkers, 4(1), 169-191.

  • Coombs, J.R., & Daniels, L.R.B. (1991). Philosophical inquiry: Conceptual analysis. In C. Edmond ( E d Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 27-41). Short, state University of New York Press.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (2009). The Seasons of the Land (Hassan Malekshahi, Translator). Tehran: Soroush (IRIB).

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (2013). "Tasilat" (Seyed Hossein Mousavian, edited). Tehran: Research Institute of Wisdom and Philosophy of Iran.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (1408 AH). Logistics (Logistics in Logistics). Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Public Library.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (1995). The Opinions and Contradictions of the People of AlMadinah. Beirut: Al-Hilal School.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (2010A). "Aysa al-Alum" (Hossein Khadiivaj, Translator). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (2010b). ”Al-Siyaseh al-Madnieh” (Hasan Malekshahi, Translator). Tehran: Soroush.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (1390a). Farabi's Philosophical Rays (Saeed Rahimian, Translator). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company.

  • Farabi, A.N.M.B.M. (1390b). Farabi and the Path to Bliss: An Exploration of the Ethics of Virtue from Farabi's Perspective (Nawab Moghbi, Translator). Tehran: Sadra Islamic WisdomFoundation.

  • Given, L.M. (2008). Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Ed). London: The SAGE.

  • Kerametti, Y. (2008). The classification of science: The Impact of Farabi's Views on the Classification of Science in Medieval Europe. The Book of the Month of Philosophy, 17, 3-7.

  • Mahouzi, R (2013). Farabi and Ibn Sina's approach to science and its division: Predisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or interdisciplinary. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 5(3), 37-51.

  • Morin, E. (2004). The seven essential knowledge forfuture education (Mohammed Yemeni Doozi Sarbazi, Translator). Tehran: ShahidBeheshti University.

  • Morin, E. Et al. (2008). Complex thought and learning in the planetary age (Mohammed Yemeni Dozhi Sarbazi, Translator). Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies.

  • Morin, E. (2011). Where's the World Going? (Abbas Bagheri, Translator). Tehran: FarzanRooz.

  • Morin, E. (1391a). Method: Cognition Cognition (Ali Asadi, Translator). Tehran: Soroush Publications.

  • Morin, E. (1391b). Method: The Nature of Nature (Ali Asadi, Translator). Tehran: Soroush Publications.

  • Morin, E. (1394a). An introduction to complex thought (Afshin, Jahandideh, Translator). Tehran: Publication.

  • Morin, E. (1394b). Human Identity (Amir Nikpi and Faezeh Mohammadi, translators). Tehran: Ghazida Sara.

  • Mirza, M., & Hassan, M. (2014). Farabi's educational philosophy. Tehran: Shahed University Press and Publication Center.

  • Mirza, M., & Hassan, M. (2016). A comparative study of the views of Hakim Abu Nasr Farabi and John Henry Newman on the sciences. Two Quarterly Journal of Education and Learning Research, 75(23), 105-116.

  • Rahimi, G. (2011). Farabi, the science of technology and the philosophy of technology. Research in the History of Islamic Civilization, 4(1), 85-102.

  • Rafiei, B. (2013). Great Muslim 'Trainers. Qom: Department of Research, University of Tehran, Tehran: Position.

  • Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Farabi Biography. In The Book of Al-Haruf (pp. 17-17). Tehran: ShahidBeheshti University Press and Publication Center.

  • Sadra, A. (2008). The Science of Farabi. Tehran: Organization for Research in Culture and Islamic Thought.

  • Taghi, Z.M. (2009). Edgar Morin's seven-volume anthropological theory: Human humanity. Social Science Month Book, 16, 90-98.


Abstract Views: 283

PDF Views: 0




  • Evaluating a Comparative Study of the Nature of Science from Farabi and Moren’s Perspectives and its Implications on Training Sciences

Abstract Views: 283  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ali Khosh Iqbal Fard
Department of Education Science, Shahid University, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Mohammad Hasan Mirza Mohammady
Department of Education Science, Shahid University, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Masoud Masoudi
Department of Psychology and Education, Herat University, Afghanistan, South Africa

Abstract


The present study purpose is to obtain new educational implications derived from the adaptation of Farabi and Moren votes about science. This study has been done by a comparative procedure and using progressive inference method to discover educational implications. The study explains the findings after explaining the Farabi and Moren general idea, providing the quad questions and expressing the research method. According to these findings, Farabi it has perceived science is based on certainty, equal to value, united with philosophy, and considers and Moren science come from uncertainty with complex entanglements under the criticism of science in the modem world . Farabi and Moren have common opinions through training about the unity of science while multiplicity, the unity of science and philosophy, trans disciplinary training, increasing the authority of the student, and building an ideal society. They also have significant differences in the teleology, the place of logic in science and learning, the type of science unity, and the teleology of science. Significant implications have been provided to design a new educational pattern based on these recognized features of adaptation of the two philosophers' views on the subject of science in the final section. There is a new approach in designing the curriculum among this adaptation, which not only can solve the crises caused by specialization, but also by changing the viewpoint to science nature provide a possibility of synergy between specialists of various sciences from the learning stage.

Keywords


Farabi, Moren, Adaptation, Nature of Science, Unity of Science, Classification of Science, Complexity.

References