Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Don’t Believe What You See in Mouth, Listen To Condyles - A Systemic Review


Affiliations
1 Dept of Orthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore, India
2 D.J. Dental College of Dental Sciences & Research, UP, India
 

Centric relation, static and dynamic occlusion are less talked about than its actual importance in dentistry. Their relevance to different disciplines of odontology (general dentistry, conservative dentistry, orthodontics, prosthodontics, dental technicians) has been well documented. Numerous articles in scientific literature regarding the importance and necessity of interdisciplinary teamwork in dentistry to correct problems associated with occlusion has been documented. The centric occlusion and centric relation (CO CR) discrepancy is multifactorial with a degree of psychogenic influence varying throughout an individual's life with phases of symptoms affecting the quality of life. The current review highlights role of various disciplines in rectifying problems relating to discrepancy in centric occlusion and centric relation.
User
Notifications

  • Bourzgui F, Aghoutan H, Diouny S. Craniomandibular Disorders and Mandibular Reference Position in Orthodontic Treatment. International Journal of Dentistry. 2013; 2013: Article ID 890942.
  • Goodman P, Greene CD, Laskin DM. Response of patients with pain-dysfunction syndrome to mock equilibration. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976; 92:755–83. McNamara JA, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temperomandibular disorders. A review. J Orofacial Pain. 1995; 9:73–90
  • Mohan B, Sihivahanan D. Occlusion: The gateway to success. Journal of Interdisciplinary dentistry. 2012; 2:68–77.
  • Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. J Clin Orthod. 1981 Jan; 15(1):32–40, 44–51.
  • Jeffrey P. Okeson - Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion: 6th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008 Jun 27.
  • Karl PJ, Foley TF. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records. Angle Orthod. 1999 Apr; 69(2):117–24.
  • Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. J Clin Orthod. 1981; 15(2):100–23.
  • Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. J Clin Orthod. 1981; 15(3):174–9, 182–98.
  • Martha E. Nunn The Effect of Occlusal Discrepancies on Periodontitis. I. Relationship of Initial Occlusal Discrepancies to Initial Clinical Parameters. Journal of Periodontology. 2001; 72:485–494.
  • Prakash H, Duggal R, et al. Functional occlusion in orthodontics. J Ind Orthod Soc. 2005; 38:80–90.
  • Girardot RAJr. Comparison of Condylar Position in Hyperdivergent and Hypodivergent Facial Skeletal Types. Angle Orthodontist. 2001; 71(4).
  • Dawson PE. Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems. St.Louis: Mosby; 1980.
  • Leonard A. Hess Restoring the Functional Zone: Correcting Anterior Constriction with Centric Relation-Based Inside Dentistry. 2007; 3(9).
  • Cordray FE. Centric relation treatment and articulator mountings in orthodontics. The Angle Orthodontist. 1996; 66:153–8.
  • Ash MM, Ramfjord S. Occlusion. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1996.
  • Geering AH. Occlusal interferences and functional disturbances of the masticatory system. Clin Periodontol. 1974; 1:12–9.
  • Reynold M. Occlusal wear facets. I Prosthet Dent. 1970; 24:367–72.
  • Clark R, Evans RD. Functional occlusion: I A review. Orthod. 2001; 28:76–81.
  • Sved A. Equilibration as post retention measure. Dent Clinics North America. 1960; 203–15.

Abstract Views: 496

PDF Views: 154




  • Don’t Believe What You See in Mouth, Listen To Condyles - A Systemic Review

Abstract Views: 496  |  PDF Views: 154

Authors

Adil
Dept of Orthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore, India
Anisha Vallakati
Dept of Orthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore, India
Ankur Aggarwal
D.J. Dental College of Dental Sciences & Research, UP, India
H. Jyothikiran
Dept of Orthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore, India
S. Ravi
Dept of Orthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore, India

Abstract


Centric relation, static and dynamic occlusion are less talked about than its actual importance in dentistry. Their relevance to different disciplines of odontology (general dentistry, conservative dentistry, orthodontics, prosthodontics, dental technicians) has been well documented. Numerous articles in scientific literature regarding the importance and necessity of interdisciplinary teamwork in dentistry to correct problems associated with occlusion has been documented. The centric occlusion and centric relation (CO CR) discrepancy is multifactorial with a degree of psychogenic influence varying throughout an individual's life with phases of symptoms affecting the quality of life. The current review highlights role of various disciplines in rectifying problems relating to discrepancy in centric occlusion and centric relation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jade%2F2014%2F91500