Journal of Biological Control

The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


The comparative prey consumption and searching efficiency of fourth instar gruhs of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus and Coccinella transversalis Fabricius against three aphid species, viz. Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch), Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Macrosiphmn rosae (Linnaeus) were evaluated to assess the efficiency of these predators in aphid biocontroI. The larvae of C. septempunctata consumed maximum number (245.60±1.92) of M. persicae at prey density of 800 and minimum (18.80±0.88) of R. maidis at prey density of 25 in 24 hours. Fourth instar of C. transversalis consumed maximum number (224.80±1.93) of M. persicae at the prey density of 800 and minimum number (17.40±0.58) of M. rosae at the prey density of 25 in 24 hours. Area of discovery of C. septempunctata and C. transversalis was maximum at the lowest predator (1) and prey-densities (25) of M. persicae. The same was minimum in the case of C. septempunctata and C. transversalis at highest predator (8) and prey- densities (800) of R. maidis and M. rosae, respectively. Prey consumption hy hoth coccinellids increased but their searching efficiency decreased with increase of either prey or predator density. The predatory potential and searching efficiency of C. septempunctata was relatively higher than that of C. transversalis.

Keywords

Aphids, Coccinella septempunctata, Coccinella transversalis, Functional Response, Numerical Response, Searching Efficiency.
User
Notifications