Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Financial Performance of Indian Banks Using Multi-Criteria Topsis


Affiliations
1 Management Science, Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
2 Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study analyses the financial performance of Indian banks from three different points of view, viz. that of regulators, investors, and borrowers, using multi-criteria TOPSIS analysis. In particular, the financial performance of public sector banks is compared with that of private sector banks from these three points of view.
The results of study show that the three different points of view of banking performance are very consistent with each other. Further, the results of the study clearly indicate that, in the Indian context, private sector banks are performing significantly better than public sector banks, and all of the top-performing banks identified from the TOPSIS analysis are private sector banks. The better performance of private sector banks may be attributed to professional, efficient management, and better customer focus and service; while the worse performance of public sector banks may be partially attributed to lack of professional, efficient management and partially to political interference and constraints.

Keywords

Financial Performance of Indian Banks, Regulators, Investors, Borrowers, TOPSIS, Public Sector Banks, Private Sector Banks.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Arya, N. (2013). The Indian banking sector: Recent developments, growth and prospects. India Brand Equity Foundation Report.

  • Bayyurt, N. (2013). Ownership effect on bank’s performance: Multi criteria decision making approaches on foreign and domestic Turkish banks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 919-928.

  • Dash, M. (2016a). Banking performance measurement for Indian banks using AHP and TOPSIS. The International Journal of Banking and Finance, 12(2), 63-76.

  • Dash, M. (2016b). Factor structure of the CAMELS Model-A case study of Indian Banks. Sixth International Conference of the Financial Engineering & Banking Society: Retrieved from http://febs2016malaga.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/19FactorStructure.pdf

  • Dash, M., & Charles, C. (2012). An analysis of the technical efficiency of banks in India. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 11(4), 100-109.

  • Dash, M., & Das, A. (2013). Performance appraisal of Indian banks using CAMELS rating. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 12(2), 31-42.

  • Dash, M., Kumari, G., & Anand, S. (2015). Comparison of Public and Private Sector Banking Performance using CAMELS Framework. Management Today - An International Journal of Management Studies, 5(3), 107-112.

  • Gundogdu, A. (2015). Measurement of financial performance using TOPSIS method for foreign banks of established in turkey between 2003-2013 Years. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(1), 139-151.

  • Hwang, C. L., Lai, Y. J., & Liu, T.Y. (1993). A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers and Operational Research, 20, 889-899.

  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  • Lok Sabha Secretariat. (2013). Financial sector in India: Regulations and reforms,” Parliament Library and Reference, Research, Documentation and Information Service Retrieved from http://164.100.47.134/intranet/financialsectorinindia.pdf

  • Onder, E., & Hepsen, A. (2013). Combining time series analysis and multi criteria decision making techniques for forecasting financial performance of banks in Turkey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Business and Economics (ICABE-13) held at New York, USA.

  • Pal, V., & Malik, N. S. (2007). A multivariate analysis of the financial characteristics of commercial banks in India. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 6(3), 43-60.

  • Reserve Bank of India. (2015). Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India 2014-15.

  • Sathye, M. (2005). Privatization, performance, and efficiency: A study of Indian banks. Vikalpa, 30(1), 7-16.

  • Shirai, S. (2002). Road from state to market - Assessing the gradual approach to banking sector reforms in India. Asian Development Bank Institute Research Paper, No. 32, 1-73.

  • Swamy, B. N. A. (2001). New competition, deregulation and emerging changes in Indian banking. Bank Quest, The Journal of Indian Institute of Bankers, 729(3), 3-22.


Abstract Views: 347

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison of Financial Performance of Indian Banks Using Multi-Criteria Topsis

Abstract Views: 347  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mihir Dash
Management Science, Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
Sarita Kumari Singh
Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
Saqeeb U. Rahaman
Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
Sajana Nadigadda
Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
Surbhi Srivastava
Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India
Ankur Agrawal
Alliance University, School of Business, Karnataka, India

Abstract


This study analyses the financial performance of Indian banks from three different points of view, viz. that of regulators, investors, and borrowers, using multi-criteria TOPSIS analysis. In particular, the financial performance of public sector banks is compared with that of private sector banks from these three points of view.
The results of study show that the three different points of view of banking performance are very consistent with each other. Further, the results of the study clearly indicate that, in the Indian context, private sector banks are performing significantly better than public sector banks, and all of the top-performing banks identified from the TOPSIS analysis are private sector banks. The better performance of private sector banks may be attributed to professional, efficient management, and better customer focus and service; while the worse performance of public sector banks may be partially attributed to lack of professional, efficient management and partially to political interference and constraints.

Keywords


Financial Performance of Indian Banks, Regulators, Investors, Borrowers, TOPSIS, Public Sector Banks, Private Sector Banks.

References