Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Relevance of Intangible Assets:An Opinion of Indian Practitioners


Affiliations
1 Khalsa College for Women, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
2 School of Business Studies, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. The intangible assets are non-physical sources of value generated by innovation (discovery), unique organisational designs, or human resource practices. This paper examines the importance assigned to intangible assets, dimensions related to measurement and reporting of intangible assets and relationship between orientation towards intangible assets and selected variables. The data was collected using a structured questionnaire from 164 practitioners. It was found that intangible assets which are covered under Intellectual Property Law are accorded more important than other intangible assets. Major issues pertaining to intangible assets, in Indian context, were identified using factor analysis. Value relevance of intangible assets and management of intangibles assets were identified as the major issues. Cluster analysis was used to categorize respondents on basis of their orientation towards intangible assets. The results of correlation analysis show that there exist a positive relationship between management of intangible assets and importance assigned to intangible assets covered under intellectual property rights.

Keywords

Intangible Assets, Knowledge Assets, Intellectual Property Rights, Practitioners.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Barth, M. E., Kasznik, R., & Nicholas, M. F. (2001). Analyst coverage and intangible assets. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 1–34.

  • Barth, M. E., & Kasznik, R. (1999). Share repurchases and intangible assets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2), 211–241.

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, B., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: Computers and organization capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 137–181.

  • Buiges, P., Jacquemin, A., & Marchipont, J. F. (Eds.). (2000). Competitiveness and the value of intangible assets. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

  • Carmeli, A., & Azeroual, B. (2009). How relational capital and knowledge combination capability enhance the performance of work units in a high technology industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 85–103.

  • Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible capital and economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661–85.

  • Corrado, C., Haltiwanger, J., & Sichel, D. (Eds.). (2005). Measuring capital in the new economy. NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Doukas, J. A., & Padmanabhan, P. (2002). The operational hedging properties of intangible assets: The case of nonvoluntary foreign asset selloffs. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 13(2), 183–213.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121.

  • Field, A. (2003). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows: Advanced techniques for beginners. London: SAGE Publications.

  • Fukao, K., Miyagawa, T., Mukai, K., & Shinoda, Y. (2009). Intangible investment in Japan: Measurement and contribution to economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 717–736.

  • Gelb, D. S. (2002). Intangible assets and firms’ disclosures: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29(3–4), 457–476.

  • Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558.

  • Hulten, C., & Hao, X. (2008). What is a company really worth? Intangible capital and the ‘Market to Book’ value puzzle. NBER Working Papers, No. 14548.

  • Leitner, K. H., & Warden, C. (2004). Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: Specifics, lessons learned and perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 15(1), 33–51.

  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

  • Ling, Y. H. (2013). The influence of intellectual capital on organisational performance- knowledge management as moderator. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 937–964.

  • Marrano, M. G., Haskel, J., & Wallis, G. (2009). What happened to the knowledge economy? ICT, intangible investment, and Britain’s productivity. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 686–716.

  • Ritter, A., & Wells, P. (2006). Identifiable intangible asset disclosures, stock prices and future earnings. Accounting and Finance, 46(5), 843–863.

  • Roulbtone, D. T. (2011). Discussion of intangible investment and the importance of firm specific factors in the determination of earnings. Review of Accounting Standards, 16(3), 574–586.

  • Su, W. H., & Wells, P. (2014). The association of identifiable intangible assets acquired and recognised in business acquisitions with post acquisition firm performance. Accounting and Finance, 55(2), 1171–1199.

  • Teece, D. J. (1998), Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55–79.

  • Wu, S. H., Lin, L. Y., & Hsu, M. Y (2007). Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organisations. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3), 279–296.

  • Wyatt, A., & Abernethy, M. (2008). Accounting for intangible investments. Australian Accounting Review, 18(2), 95–107.


Abstract Views: 213

PDF Views: 0




  • Relevance of Intangible Assets:An Opinion of Indian Practitioners

Abstract Views: 213  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sarishma Sharma
Khalsa College for Women, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Khushdeep Dharni
School of Business Studies, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Abstract


Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. The intangible assets are non-physical sources of value generated by innovation (discovery), unique organisational designs, or human resource practices. This paper examines the importance assigned to intangible assets, dimensions related to measurement and reporting of intangible assets and relationship between orientation towards intangible assets and selected variables. The data was collected using a structured questionnaire from 164 practitioners. It was found that intangible assets which are covered under Intellectual Property Law are accorded more important than other intangible assets. Major issues pertaining to intangible assets, in Indian context, were identified using factor analysis. Value relevance of intangible assets and management of intangibles assets were identified as the major issues. Cluster analysis was used to categorize respondents on basis of their orientation towards intangible assets. The results of correlation analysis show that there exist a positive relationship between management of intangible assets and importance assigned to intangible assets covered under intellectual property rights.

Keywords


Intangible Assets, Knowledge Assets, Intellectual Property Rights, Practitioners.

References