Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Sensitivity Analysis using Garch Model:Evidence from Indian Stock Market


Affiliations
1 University Business School, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The sensitivity of a financial market can be assessed by understanding the volatility in the stock returns. Volatility forecasting measures the riskiness of the investments. In a financial time series, there are periods where volatility is higher in comparison to other periods. Furthermore, the volatility in the stock movement tends to increase during economic disturbances such as recessions and financial crises due to compulsive selling and buying of stocks. The aim of the study is to conduct a sensitivity analysis of the Indian Stock Market across time and different frequencies. The S&P BSE 500 index has been selected to study the sensitivity of the Indian stock market as it represents 93% of market capitalisation of 20 major industries of the Indian economy. The daily returns, calculated using the closing value of the selected BSE index for a period of 19 years from 01-02-1999 to 31-08-2018, has been used as the variable for the study. The stationarity of time series data has been assessed using Augmented Dickey fuller test with breakpoints to identify the significant date in the time series. The Augmented Dickey Fuller test suggests that, at level difference, 18th May 2009 is a significant breakpoint date in the daily returns series, which coincides with the report on recession by National Bureau of Economic research. Hence, two time series, one before and one after 18th May 2009 were created. The normality of the two series has been tested using Jarque Bera Test, which suggests that the time series data are not normally distributed. The Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model was applied to study the sensitivity of the Indian stock returns. The ARCH LM test highlights the significant existence of ARCH effect in the series before the breakpoint date, yet no ARCH effect was found in the series from 18-05-2009 to 31-8-2018. The results demonstrate that there is a significant decrease in the volatility in the daily returns after the recession period. The results of the study further suggest that volatility in daily returns existed before the period of recession, which was caused due to excessive leverage effect. However, the volatility in the daily returns has significantly reduced. This feature of the stock market movement can be attributed to increased financial literacy among investors and improved prudential norms of Securities Exchange Board of India. Hence, it can be concluded that minor fluctuation no longer cause panic amongst investor as they did before the 2009 market crash.

Keywords

GARCH, ARCH effect, S&P BSE 500 Index, Breakpoint Unit Root.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bajaj, S. (2014). Sensitivity of Indian Stock Market vis-à-vis Price Volume Relationship in the Backdrop of FII. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 10(3), 173-189.

  • Bali, T. (2000). Testing the empirical performance of stochastic volatility models of the short-term interest rate, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2), 191-215.

  • Bandivadekar, S., & Ghosh, S. (2003). Derivatives and volatility on Indian stock markets. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 24(3), 187-201.

  • Banumathy, K., & Azhagaiah, R. (2015). Modelling stock market volatility: Evidence from India. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 13(1).

  • Bekaert, G., & Wu, G. (2000). Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Review of Financial Studies, 13, 1-42.

  • Black, F. (1976). The pricing of commodity contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), 167-179.

  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654.

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.

  • Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. F., & Nelson, D. B. (1994). “ARCH Models,” in R.F. Engle and D. McFadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, 4, 2959-3038.

  • Chan, L., Jegadeesh, N., & Lakonishok, J. (1997). Momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 51, 1681-1713.

  • Chand, S., Kamal, S., & Ali, I. (2012). Modelling and volatility analysis of share prices using ARCH and GARCH Models. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(1), 77–82.

  • Chou, R. Y. (1988). Volatility persistence and stock valuations: Some empirical evidence using GARCH. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3(4), 279-94.

  • Deepak, R. (2015). Security returns spectrum - An analysis of seasonality and sensitivity of Indian stock markets. DHARANA-Bhavan’s International Journal of Business, 9(1), 56-71.

  • Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1008.

  • Floros, C. (2008). Modelling volatility using GARCH models: Evidence from Egypt and Israel. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 2, 31–41.

  • Franses, P. H., & Van Dijk, D. (1996). Forecasting stock market volatility using (non-linear) GARCH models. Journal of Forecast, 15, 229-235.

  • Goudarzi, H., & Ramanarayanan, C. S. (2010). Modelling and estimation of volatility in Indian stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 85–98.

  • Goudarzi, H., & Ramanarayanam, C. S. (2009). Modelling asymmetric volatility in Indian stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 85-98.

  • India Brand Equity Foundation (September 2018). Financial Services. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/download/Financial-Services-Report-Sep-2018.pdf

  • Kapoor, A. (2017, July 25). A Change in Investment Patterns in Households Post Demonetisation. The Bloomberg Quint. Retrieved from https://www.thequint.com/news/business/indian-household-savings-financial-assetspotential-for-growth. Retrieved On: November 21, 2018.

  • Karmakar, M. (2005). Modelling conditional volatility of the Indian stock markets. Vikalpa, 30(3), 21-37.

  • Kenneth, A. T. (2013). Relationship between volatility and expected returns in two emerging markets. Business and Economics Journal, 84, 1-7.

  • Mishra, P. K. (2010). A GARCH model approach to capital market volatility: The case of India. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 9(3), 631-641.

  • Mittal, A. K., Arora, D. D., & Goyal, N. (2012). Modelling the volatility of Indian stock market. GITAM Journal of Management, 10(1), 224-243.

  • Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A New Approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 34770.

  • Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit ischolar_main hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1361-1401.

  • Perron, P. (1997). Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Journal of Econometrics, 80(2), 355-385.

  • Raju, M. T., & Ghosh, A. (2004). Stock market volatility-An International Comparison, Securities and Exchange Board of India.

  • Sahu, P., & Kumari, S. (2018). Modelling Stock Return Volatility in India. MPRA Paper No. 86674.

  • Singh, S., & Tripathi, L. K. (2016). Modelling stock market return volatility: Evidence from India. Research Journal of Financial and Accounting, 7(13), 2222-2847.

  • Srikanth, P. (2014). Modeling asymmetric volatility in Indian stock market. Pacific Business Review International, 6(9), 87-92.

  • Starica, C., & Granger, C. (2005). Non-stationarities in stock returns. Review of economics and statistics, 87(3), 503-522.

  • Tessaromatis, N. (2003). Stock market sensitivity to interest rates and inflation. SSRN E-Journal.

  • Vijayalakshmi, S., & Gaur, S. (2013). Modelling volatility: Indian stock and foreign exchange markets. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking 2(1), 583–98.

  • Zick, C. D., Mayer, R. N., & Glaubitz, K. (2012). The kids are all right: Generational differences in responses to the great recession. Journal of Financial Counseling & Planning, 23(1).

  • Zivot, E., & Andrews, K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit ischolar_main hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(10), 251–270.


Abstract Views: 285

PDF Views: 0




  • Sensitivity Analysis using Garch Model:Evidence from Indian Stock Market

Abstract Views: 285  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nikita Chopra
University Business School, Punjab, India

Abstract


The sensitivity of a financial market can be assessed by understanding the volatility in the stock returns. Volatility forecasting measures the riskiness of the investments. In a financial time series, there are periods where volatility is higher in comparison to other periods. Furthermore, the volatility in the stock movement tends to increase during economic disturbances such as recessions and financial crises due to compulsive selling and buying of stocks. The aim of the study is to conduct a sensitivity analysis of the Indian Stock Market across time and different frequencies. The S&P BSE 500 index has been selected to study the sensitivity of the Indian stock market as it represents 93% of market capitalisation of 20 major industries of the Indian economy. The daily returns, calculated using the closing value of the selected BSE index for a period of 19 years from 01-02-1999 to 31-08-2018, has been used as the variable for the study. The stationarity of time series data has been assessed using Augmented Dickey fuller test with breakpoints to identify the significant date in the time series. The Augmented Dickey Fuller test suggests that, at level difference, 18th May 2009 is a significant breakpoint date in the daily returns series, which coincides with the report on recession by National Bureau of Economic research. Hence, two time series, one before and one after 18th May 2009 were created. The normality of the two series has been tested using Jarque Bera Test, which suggests that the time series data are not normally distributed. The Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model was applied to study the sensitivity of the Indian stock returns. The ARCH LM test highlights the significant existence of ARCH effect in the series before the breakpoint date, yet no ARCH effect was found in the series from 18-05-2009 to 31-8-2018. The results demonstrate that there is a significant decrease in the volatility in the daily returns after the recession period. The results of the study further suggest that volatility in daily returns existed before the period of recession, which was caused due to excessive leverage effect. However, the volatility in the daily returns has significantly reduced. This feature of the stock market movement can be attributed to increased financial literacy among investors and improved prudential norms of Securities Exchange Board of India. Hence, it can be concluded that minor fluctuation no longer cause panic amongst investor as they did before the 2009 market crash.

Keywords


GARCH, ARCH effect, S&P BSE 500 Index, Breakpoint Unit Root.

References