Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Drivers of Synergy Gains in Indian M&As: A System GMM Approach


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
2 Senior Research Scholar, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this article is to show the potential realisation of synergistic advantages for Indian firms experiencing M&A, by examining 120 M&A deals which took place between 2005 and 2015. The aim of the present study is to examine: (a) if the target is small relative to acquirer, then synergy gains will also be small, (b) if the mode of payment for the deal is cash, greater synergies are gained, and (c) if the acquisitions take place in related industries more synergies are gained. The paper uses system generalised methods of moments (GMM) estimation method to estimate the relationship. The results demonstrate that the profitability of acquiring entities increases in post-M&A stage, when the deal is settled in cash and mergers take place in related industries. Synergistic advantages of M&A appear to be perceived by enhanced market cap to assets, improvement in financial leverage, and a positive operating cash flow return on asset. The paper examines a comprehensive set of Indian domestic M&A deals. Such extensive study to assess the potential realisation of synergistic advantages for Indian firms experiencing M&A has not been undertaken in the literature so far. The study’s policy ramifications are that regulators should facilitate the creation of an effective market for corporate regulation. The M&A strategy is highly important in the post-liberalisation phase in the corporate restructuring process. M&A creates synergy with the effective utilisation of capital in the long run.

Keywords

Mergers and Acquisitions, Corporate Performance, India, Synergies, System Generalised Methods of Moments
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F., & Mandelker, G. N. (1992). The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1605-1621.

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.

  • Asquith, P. (1983). Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 51-83.

  • Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Barai, P., & Mohanty, P. (2014). Role of industry relatedness in performance of Indian acquirers—Long- and short-run effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 1045-1073.

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.

  • Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141-162.

  • Bond, S. R., & Windmeijer, F. (2002). Finite sample inference for GMM estimators in linear panel data models.

  • Brañas-Garza, P., Bucheli, M., & García-Muñoz, T. (2011). Dynamic panel data: A useful technique in experiments.

  • Campa, J. M., & Hernando, I. (2006). M&As performance in the European financial industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(12), 3367-3392.

  • Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.

  • Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2004). Consolidation in the European insurance industry: Do mergers and acquisitions create value for shareholders?

  • Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2004(1), 217-258.

  • Dargenidou, C., Gregory, A., & Hua, S. (2016). How far does financial reporting allow us to judge whether M&A activity is successful? Accounting and Business Research, 46(5), 467-499.

  • Dash, A. (2004). Value creation through mergers: The myth and reality. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 10(10), 20-38.

  • Devos, E., Kadapakkam, P. R., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2009). How do mergers create value? A comparison of taxes, market power, and efficiency improvements as explanations for synergies. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1179-1211.

  • Dutta, S., & Jog, V. (2009). The long-term performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(8), 1400-1412.

  • Franks, J., Harris, R., & Titman, S. (1991). The postmerger share-price performance of acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(1), 81-96.

  • Ghosh, A. (2001). Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 151-178.

  • Godbole, P. G. (2015). Mergers, acquisitions and corporate restructuring. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd.

  • Gregory, A. (1997). An examination of the long run performance of UK acquiring firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(7-8), 971-1002.

  • Hamza, T., Sghaier, A., & Thraya, M. F. (2016). How do takeovers create synergies? Evidence from France. Studies in Business and Economics, 11(1), 54-72.

  • Harding, D., & Rovit, S. (2004). Mastering the merger: Four critical decisions that make or break the deal. Harvard Business Press.

  • Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1992). Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135-175.

  • Jarrell, G. A., Brickley, J. A., & Netter, J. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 49-68.

  • Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.

  • Junge, L. M. (2014). Operating synergy: Types and their impact on post-merger performance (Unpublished thesis).

  • Kim, J. Y., & Canina, L. (2013). Acquisition premiums and performance improvements for acquirers and targets in the lodging industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(4), 416-425.

  • Kumar, R. (2009). Post-merger corporate performance: An Indian perspective. Management Research News.

  • Laabs, J. P., & Schiereck, D. (2010). The long-term success of M&A in the automotive supply industry: Determinants of capital market performance. Journal of Economics and Finance, 34(1), 61-88.

  • Langetieg, T. C. (1978). An application of a three-factor performance index to measure stockholder gains from merger. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(4), 365-383.

  • Leepsa, N. M., & Mishra, C. S. (2012). Post-merger financial performance: A study with reference to select manufacturing companies in India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 83(83), 6-17.

  • Manson, S., Powell, R., Stark, A. W., & Thomas, H. M. (2000, December). Identifying the sources of gains from takeovers. Accounting Forum, 24(4), 319-343.

  • Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201-228.

  • Mohanty, P., & Mishra, S. (2014). Run-up in stock prices prior to merger & acquisitions announcements: Evidence from India. NSE Working Paper.

  • Mooney, T., & Shim, H. (2015). Does financial synergy provide a rationale for conglomerate mergers? Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 44(4), 537-586.

  • Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1417-1426.

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pillania, R. K., Kumar, S., & Bansal, L. K. (2008). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India. Management Decision.

  • Ramakrishnan, K. (2008). Long-term post-merger performance of firms in India. Vikalpa, 33(2), 47-64.

  • Rani, N., & Asija, A. (2017). Signalling power of corporate name change: A case of Indian firms. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 173-181.

  • Rizvi, N. U., Kashiramka, S., & Singh, S. (2018). Basel I to Basel III: Impact of credit risk and interest rate risk of banks in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(1_suppl), S83-S111.

  • Roberts, M. R., & Whited, T. M. (2011). Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. In G. Constantinides, M. Harris & R. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (vol. 2).

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.

  • Seth, A. (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 99-115.

  • Sharma, D. S., & Ho, J. (2002). The impact of acquisitions on operating performance: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1-2), 155-200.

  • Sinha, N., Kaushik, K. P., & Chaudhary, T. (2010). Measuring post-merger and acquisition performance: An investigation of select financial sector organizations in India. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4), 190-200.

  • Switzer, J. A. (1996). Evidence on real gains in corporate acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business, 48(5), 443-460.

  • Torres-Reyna, O. (2009). Panel data analysis: Fixed & random effects: Version 3.0. Princeton University.

  • Tsung-Ming, Y. E. H., & Hoshino, Y. (2002). The impact of M&As on shareholder wealth: Evidence from Taiwanese corporations. The Developing Economies, 40(4), 553-563.

  • Verma, B. P., Maji, P., & Nair, S. (2013). Mergers and acquisitions and their impact on corporate values: Pre-and post-merger analysis of Indian Banks. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(2), 5-16.

  • Weston, J. F., & Chung, K. S. C. (1990). Mergers, restructuring, and corporate control (No. 338.8 W5284m Ej. 1). Prentice Hall.

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420-445.

  • Yeh, T. M., & Hoshino, Y. (2000). The effects of mergers and acquisitions on Taiwanese corporations. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 3(2), 183-199.


Abstract Views: 224

PDF Views: 0




  • Drivers of Synergy Gains in Indian M&As: A System GMM Approach

Abstract Views: 224  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anjala Kalsie
Associate Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Neha Singh
Senior Research Scholar, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Abstract


The aim of this article is to show the potential realisation of synergistic advantages for Indian firms experiencing M&A, by examining 120 M&A deals which took place between 2005 and 2015. The aim of the present study is to examine: (a) if the target is small relative to acquirer, then synergy gains will also be small, (b) if the mode of payment for the deal is cash, greater synergies are gained, and (c) if the acquisitions take place in related industries more synergies are gained. The paper uses system generalised methods of moments (GMM) estimation method to estimate the relationship. The results demonstrate that the profitability of acquiring entities increases in post-M&A stage, when the deal is settled in cash and mergers take place in related industries. Synergistic advantages of M&A appear to be perceived by enhanced market cap to assets, improvement in financial leverage, and a positive operating cash flow return on asset. The paper examines a comprehensive set of Indian domestic M&A deals. Such extensive study to assess the potential realisation of synergistic advantages for Indian firms experiencing M&A has not been undertaken in the literature so far. The study’s policy ramifications are that regulators should facilitate the creation of an effective market for corporate regulation. The M&A strategy is highly important in the post-liberalisation phase in the corporate restructuring process. M&A creates synergy with the effective utilisation of capital in the long run.

Keywords


Mergers and Acquisitions, Corporate Performance, India, Synergies, System Generalised Methods of Moments

References