Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Performance: a Study of Indian Firms


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Corporate Governance practices are required to ensure better performance of the firm and hence better shareholder returns. But whether the corporate governance practices bring in better firm performance is always a research question. In this paper, we study the relationship between the firm performance and three corporate governance mechanisms namely board practices, financial disclosure and ownership rights using a sample of blue chip Indian firms. The results of the multiple regressions suggest that our model, which is conceptualized based on literature existing literature does not explain the relationship between the dependent and study variables. But study provides base for further research in this area.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Firm Performance, Board Practices, Ownership, Disclosure Paper Type: Empirical
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adjaoud F, Zeghal D & Andaleeb S (2007). “The effects of boards quality on performance: A study of Canadian firms", An International Review, 15(4), 623-635.

  • Ahuja, G and Sumit K. Majumdar (1998) “An Assessment of Indian State Owned Enterprises." Journal of Productivity Analysis. Vol.9, 113-132.

  • Archambault, J.J. and Archambault, M.E. (2003). “A Multinational Test of Determinants of Corporate Disclosure", International Journal of Accounting, 38, 173-194.

  • Barney J (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

  • Berle, Adolf and Gardiner Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Mac-Millan, New-York.

  • Botosan, C. (1997). “The Impact of Annual Report Disclosure Level on Investor Base and the Cost of Capital", Accounting Review, 72(July), 323-350.

  • Bushman, Robert M. and Smith, Abbie J. (2003). “Transparency, Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance", FRBNY Economic Policy Review, (April), 65-87.

  • Chaganti, R., and Damanpour, F, (1991) “Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure and Firm Performance." Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, 479-491

  • Chhibber, P and Sumit K. Majumdar (1998) “State as Investor and State as Owner: Consequences for Firm Performances in India." Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago. 1998.

  • Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. (1985) “The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences." Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-77.

  • Dennis,Dianek and John J.McConnell (2003) “International Corporate Governance." European corporate governance institute.

  • Erakovik L and Goel S (2008). “Board Management Relationship: Resources and Internal Dynamics", Management Revue, 19, (1), 53-69.

  • Garg A.K (2007). “Influence of board size and independence on firm performance: A Study of Indian Companies", Vikalpa, 32(3), 39-60.

  • Ghosh S (2006). “Do board characteristics affect performance? Firm level evidence for India", Applied Economic Letters, 13, 435-443.

  • Healy, P., and K. Palepu (2001). “Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Captial Markets: A Review of the Empirical Literature" Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 405-440.

  • Healy, P M, Hutton A P and K G. Palepu (1999). “Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure", Contemporary Accounting Research, 16, 3(Fall), 485-520.

  • He J & Mahoney J.T (2006). “Firm capability, corporate governance and firm competitive behavior: A multi theoretic framework", Working Paper, http://www.business. uiuc.edu/Working_Papers/papers/06−0103.pdf

  • Hillman A.J, Cannela A.A and Paetzoid R.L (2000). “The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change", Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235-255.

  • Jahmani, Y. and Ansari, M. (2006) “Managerial ownership, Risk, and Corporate performance." IJCM Vol.16 (3&4), 212-221.

  • Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, Agency costs and Ownership structure." Journal of Financial Economics, 4:305-360.

  • Judge W.Q and Zeithmal C.P (1992). “Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process", Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 766-794.

  • Khanna, T Plaepu, K.G and Srinivasan, S (2004). Disclosure Practices of Foreign Companies interacting with U.S. Markets. Journal of Accounting Research 42:475-508.

  • Klein A (2002). “Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings management", Journal of Accounting and Finance, 33, 375-400.

  • Kumar, Jayesh (2003) “Does Ownership Structure Influence Firm Value? Evidence from India." EFMA (2004). Basel Meetings Paper.

  • Lang, M., and R. Lundholm (1993). “Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analysts Ratings of Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31 (Autumn), 246-271.

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, Robert W. (1988) “Management ownership and Market valuation: An empirical analysis." Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315.

  • Mudambi, R. and Nicosia, C. (1998) “Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from the UK financial services industry." Applied Financial Economics, 8, 175-180.

  • Mueller, E. and Spitz-Oener, A. (2006) “Managerial ownership and company performance in German small and medium-sized private enterprises." German Economic Review 7(2), 233-247.

  • Ng, Christiana Y.M. (2005) “An empirical study on the relationship between ownership and performance in a familybased corporate environment." Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance. 121-146.

  • OECD (2004), OECD Principle of Corporate Governance, Paris: OECD.

  • Pant, Manoj and Pattanayak, Manoranjan (2007) “Insider Ownership and Firm value:Evidence from Indian Corporate Sector." Economic and Political weekly April, 2007.

  • Perry T & Shivdasani A (2005). “Do boards affect performance? Evidence from corporate restructuring", Journal of Business, 78(4), 1403-1431.

  • Raheja C.G (2005). “Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards", Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 40(2), 1-38.

  • Shleifer, A and Robert W. Vishny (1997) “A Survey of Corporate Governance." The journal of Finance, Vol.52 No.2, 737-783.

  • Warther V.A (1998). “Board effectiveness and board dissent: A model of the boards relationship to management and shareholders", Journal of corporate finance, 4, 53-70.

  • Welbourne, Theresa M. and Cyr, Linda A. (1999) “Using ownership as an incentive. Does the ‘too many chiefs’ rule apply in entrepreneurial firms?" Group and Organization Management, Vol.24 No.4, 438-460.

  • Zeitun, R. and Gang Tian, G. (2007) “Does ownership affect a firm’s performance and default risk in Jordan?" Corporate Governance, Vol.7 No.1, 66-82.


Abstract Views: 395

PDF Views: 2




  • Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Performance: a Study of Indian Firms

Abstract Views: 395  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Tata Sai Vijay
Department of Management Studies, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
Manoj Sharma
Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

Abstract


Corporate Governance practices are required to ensure better performance of the firm and hence better shareholder returns. But whether the corporate governance practices bring in better firm performance is always a research question. In this paper, we study the relationship between the firm performance and three corporate governance mechanisms namely board practices, financial disclosure and ownership rights using a sample of blue chip Indian firms. The results of the multiple regressions suggest that our model, which is conceptualized based on literature existing literature does not explain the relationship between the dependent and study variables. But study provides base for further research in this area.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Firm Performance, Board Practices, Ownership, Disclosure Paper Type: Empirical

References