Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dealing with the Limitations of the Sharpe Ratio for Portfolio Evaluation


Affiliations
1 Department of Business and Industrial Management, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, Gujarat., India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Portfolio performance evaluation is an important criterion for selecting investment instruments. Traditionally Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen's Ratios are used to measure the performance of various portfolios, and for comparisons and ranking, Sharpe ratio being the most prominent performance measure. Owing to the limitation of the unrealistic assumption of Sharpe ratio that returns are normally distributed, many exponents have criticized its use as a performance measure. So a need arose to develop alternatives to Sharpe ratio or to put it in other words, overcoming the limitations of Sharpe ratio.

More than 100 alternative risk-adjusted performance measures can be identified in literature, most of them attempting to remedy the shortcomings of the Sharpe ratio which relies on normally distributed returns. However, there is a fervent discussion in literature whether the choice of risk-adjusted performance measure actually matters or not.

This paper focuses on the risk-adjusted performance measures which are applied to the return distribution of a portfolio of 6 mutual funds. The funds were first evaluated as per the Sharpe ratio and after it was found that the returns are not normally distributed, the portfolios were evaluated using the Adjusted Sharpe ratio and the Modified Sharpe ratio. It was found from the analysis that in many cases, the adjusted Sharpe ratio and the modified Sharpe ratio provided ranking results which were different from the traditional Sharpe ratio. In certain instances, the rankings were highly correlated to the Sharpe ratio as well as to each other.


Keywords

Sharpe Ratio, Normal Distribution, Adjusted Sharpe Ratio, Modified Sharpe Ratio, Ranks, Skewness, Kurtosis
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alexander, C. (2008). Market Risk Analysis-Quantitative Risk Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

  • Alexander, C. & Elizabeth, S. (2004). The Professional Risk Managers Handbook. The Professional Risk Managers International Association.

  • Alexander, G. J., Sharpe, W. F. & Bailey, J. V. (1999). Investments. Prentice Hall.

  • Alexander, Gorden J. and Bailey, Jeffery V. Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management. T. Learning, (Ed.) Bombay: Dryden Press.

  • Avadhani, V. A. (2006). Security Analysis and Portfolio Management (8th ed.). Himalaya Publishing House.

  • Capital asset pricing model-Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_asset_pricing_model (accessed on March 10, 2012).

  • Capital market line-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_market_ line (accessed on March 10, 2012).

  • Historical NAVs Mutual Funds | Mutual Funds India. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.personalfn.com/tools-andresources/mutual-funds/nav-history.aspx (accessed on April 15, 2012).

  • http://mfiframes.mutualfundsindia.com/rankings/pdf/ AnnualMF_Booklet_December_2011.pdf (accessed on March 10, 2012)

  • http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/DOCs/182T_ HBS120911.xls (accessed on April 17, 2012)

  • Martin-Eling, F. S. (2006). Does the choice of performance measure influence the evaluation of hedge funds? Working Papers on Risk Management and Insurance, 2-21.

  • Pezier, J. & White, A. (2006). The relative merits of investible hedge funds indices and of funds of hedge funds in optimal passive portfolios. ICMA Centre Dscussion Papers In Finance, 1-32.

  • Portfolio performance evaluation in investment portfolio management, MBA Knowledge Base. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.mbaknol.com/investment-management/ portfolio-performance-evaluation-in-investment-portfolio-management (accessed on March 10, 2012).

  • Sharpe ratio-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharpe_ratio (accessed on March 10, 2012).

  • Understanding the Sharpe ratio. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/sharpe_ratio. asp#axzz1rdhe4Wck (accessed on March 10, 2012)

  • Wiesenger, A. (2010). Risk Adjusted Performance Measurement-State of Art. 1-6.

  • Zakamouline, V. & Steen, K. (2009). Portfolio performance evaluation with generalized sharpe ratios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1242-1254.

  • William, G., Jonathan, I., Matthew, S. & Ivo, W. (2006). Portfolio Performance Manipulation and Manipulation Proof Performance Measures, 1-48.

  • Zakamouline, V. & Steen, K. (2006). Generalized Sharpe ratios And Portfolio Performance Evaluation.


Abstract Views: 581

PDF Views: 2




  • Dealing with the Limitations of the Sharpe Ratio for Portfolio Evaluation

Abstract Views: 581  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Janki Mistry
Department of Business and Industrial Management, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, Gujarat., India
Jubin Shah
Department of Business and Industrial Management, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, Gujarat., India

Abstract


Portfolio performance evaluation is an important criterion for selecting investment instruments. Traditionally Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen's Ratios are used to measure the performance of various portfolios, and for comparisons and ranking, Sharpe ratio being the most prominent performance measure. Owing to the limitation of the unrealistic assumption of Sharpe ratio that returns are normally distributed, many exponents have criticized its use as a performance measure. So a need arose to develop alternatives to Sharpe ratio or to put it in other words, overcoming the limitations of Sharpe ratio.

More than 100 alternative risk-adjusted performance measures can be identified in literature, most of them attempting to remedy the shortcomings of the Sharpe ratio which relies on normally distributed returns. However, there is a fervent discussion in literature whether the choice of risk-adjusted performance measure actually matters or not.

This paper focuses on the risk-adjusted performance measures which are applied to the return distribution of a portfolio of 6 mutual funds. The funds were first evaluated as per the Sharpe ratio and after it was found that the returns are not normally distributed, the portfolios were evaluated using the Adjusted Sharpe ratio and the Modified Sharpe ratio. It was found from the analysis that in many cases, the adjusted Sharpe ratio and the modified Sharpe ratio provided ranking results which were different from the traditional Sharpe ratio. In certain instances, the rankings were highly correlated to the Sharpe ratio as well as to each other.


Keywords


Sharpe Ratio, Normal Distribution, Adjusted Sharpe Ratio, Modified Sharpe Ratio, Ranks, Skewness, Kurtosis

References