Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Agency Costs, Managers Optimism and Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange


Affiliations
1 Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between agency costs, manager's optimism and investment cash flow sensitivity in firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The population of the study is firms listed in TSE and research sample includes 125 firms listed in TSE which is studied during the period of 2007 to 2011. Arsalan et al. (2006) model is used to measure investment cash flow sensitivity. Three proxies are considered to capture agency costs namely free cash flow, assets turnover, and operating cost to sale. Difference between predicted revenue and actual revenue divided by firm's assets measures managers' optimism. The results of the study show that there is a positive significant relationship between free cash flow and operating cost to sale with investment cash flow sensitivity and there is a negative significant relationship between assets turnover and investment cash flow sensitivity. Finally, the results indicate that, there is a positive significant relationship between manager's optimism and investment cash flow sensitivity.

Keywords

Agency Costs, Managers Optimism, Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity, Tehran Stock Exchange
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agca, S. and Mozumdar, A. (2008). The impact of capital market imperfections on investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(2), 207-216.

  • Ang, J., Cole, R. and Lin, J. (1999). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.

  • Ascioglu, A., Hegde, S. P. and McDermott, J. B. (2008). Information asymmetry and investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(6), 1036-1048.

  • Attig, N., Cleary, S., Ghoul, S. E. and Guedhami, O. (2012). Institutional investment horizon and investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1164-1180.

  • Arsalan, Ö., Florackis, C. and Ozkan, A. (2006). The role of cash holdings in reducing investment-cash flow sensitivity. Emerging Markets Review, 7(4), 320-338.

  • Ben Mohamed, E., Souissi, M. N. and Bouri, A. (2013). Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity, CEO Optimism and Agency Costs: Evidence from NYSE Panel Data Firms. Retrieved from http:// ssrn.com/abstract=2288704

  • Brown, J. R. and Petersen, B. C. (2009). Why has the investment- cash flow sensitivity declined so sharply? Rising R&D and equity market developments. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(5), 971-984.

  • Chen, Y. S. and Chen, I. J. (2013). The impact of labor unions on investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2408-2418.

  • Chen, H. and Chen, S. (2012). Investment-cash flow sensitivity cannot be a good measure of financial constraints: Evidence from the time series. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2), 393-410.

  • Chen, X. and Austin, J. Y. (2007). Re-measuring agency costs: The effectiveness of block-holders. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 47(5), 588-601.

  • Dichu, B., Chan, K. C. and Zhang, W. (2012). Asymmetric cash flow sensitivity of cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 690-700.

  • Drobetz, W., Gruninger, M. C. and Hirschvogl, S. (2009). Information Asymmetry and the Value of Cash. Retrieved from http:// www.uibk.ac.at/ibf/sonstiges/seminar/valueofcash. pdf

  • Heaton, J. B. (2002). Managerial optimism and corporate. Financial Management, 31(2), 33-45.

  • Huang, W., Jiang, F., Liu, Z. and Zhang, M. (2011). Agency cost, top executives’ overconfidence, and investment-cash flow sensitivity-evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(3), 261-277.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economics Review, 76(2), 323-339.

  • Jurkus, A. F., Park, J. C. and Woodard, L. S. (2011). Women in top management and agency costs. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 180-186.

  • Kashanipour, A. and Naginezhad, B. (2009). The effect of financial constraint on investment cash flow sensitivity. Accounting Research, (24)2, 72-93.

  • Lin, Y. H., Hu, S. Y. and Chen, M. S. (2005). Managerial optimism and corporate investment: Some empirical evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(5), 523-546.

  • Modigliani, F. & Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.

  • Pawlina, G. and Renneboog, L. (2005). Is investment cash flow sensitivity caused by the agency cost or information asymmetry: Evidence from the U.K. Discussion Paper 2005-001, Netherlands: Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.

  • Singh, M. and Davidson, W. N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 793-816.

  • Xing, L. and Bao, S. X. (2007). Effects of controlling shareholders agency on debt financing agency costs: Analysis based on real options. Systems Engineering- Theory & Practice, 27(9), 61-68.


Abstract Views: 751

PDF Views: 0




  • Agency Costs, Managers Optimism and Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange

Abstract Views: 751  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Saeid Jabbarzadeh Kangarlouei
Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Parviz Bahrami
Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Morteza Motavassel
Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, West Azarbyjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between agency costs, manager's optimism and investment cash flow sensitivity in firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The population of the study is firms listed in TSE and research sample includes 125 firms listed in TSE which is studied during the period of 2007 to 2011. Arsalan et al. (2006) model is used to measure investment cash flow sensitivity. Three proxies are considered to capture agency costs namely free cash flow, assets turnover, and operating cost to sale. Difference between predicted revenue and actual revenue divided by firm's assets measures managers' optimism. The results of the study show that there is a positive significant relationship between free cash flow and operating cost to sale with investment cash flow sensitivity and there is a negative significant relationship between assets turnover and investment cash flow sensitivity. Finally, the results indicate that, there is a positive significant relationship between manager's optimism and investment cash flow sensitivity.

Keywords


Agency Costs, Managers Optimism, Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity, Tehran Stock Exchange

References