Journal of Entrepreneurship & Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Women Dairy Farmers of Kerala State-A Socio-Personal Analysis


Affiliations
1 Department of Veterinary and Ah Extension, Cvas Mannuthy, Thrissur, Kerala, India
2 The Gandigram Rural Institute, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A study was conducted among 153 women dairy farmers of three districts of Kerala with the objectives of studying the socio-personal profile of women dairy farmers of Kerala state, to identify potential areas for intervention and design of appropriate strategies with a view to improving entrepreneurial traits specifically among women in this sector. Just over one-third (35.30%) of the respondents with one cow unit had low level of education while only 15.68 percent of women with two cow units and 9.80 percent of women with more than two cow units fell in this group. Most of the women in all the three categories had medium level of education (64.05%). Very few women (9.80%) with one cow unit had high level of education. More than half of the women dairy farmers had received trainings. Among women dairy farmers with one cow unit, however more than half had not received any trainings. Nearly 60 percent of those with two cows had received trainings while among respondents with more than two cows the corresponding figure was 68.63 percent. Most of the farm women fell in the two categories up to 50 cents and 51 cents to one acre. Just 5.88 percent of the respondents had land holding above two acres while slightly over 12 percent had land holdings between 1.1 acres and 2 acres. None of the women with one cow unit had land holding above two acres while 7.84 percent of those with two cow units and nearly one tenth of women with more than two cows fell in this category. Nearly half of the respondents (50.98%) with one cow unit had medium level of social participation while the remaining half were nearly equally distributed among the low (25.49%) and high (23.53%) social participation levels. More than half of the women with two cow units (56.86 %) had medium social participation while 27.45 percent and 15.69 percent had high and low social participation respectively.


Keywords

Women Dairy Farmers, Entrepreneurship, Socio-Personal Variables.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Appleton, S., & Balihuta, A. (1996). Education and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Uganda.

  • Journal of International Developement, 8, 415-444.

  • Bannerjee, M., & Talukdar, R. K. (1997). Variables influencing entrepreneurship of women entrepreneurs.

  • Indian Journal of Extention Education, 33(1&2).

  • Bhattacharya, H. (1979). Entrepreneurial development: A behavioral model. SEDME, 6(2), 83-98.

  • Cicek, H., Cevger, Y., & Tandogan, M. (2008).Socioeconomic factors affecting the level of adoption of innovations in dairy enterprises. Ankara Univ Vet Fak erg, 55, 183-187.

  • Cotlear, D. (1990). The effects of education on farm productivity. In: Keith Griffin and John Knight. Eds.

  • Human development and the international development strategy for the 1990s. London, MacMillan.

  • De, D. (1985). Status, symbol, and innovative entrepreneurship are predictors of farmers’ progressivism.

  • Journal of Extention System, (1), 82.

  • De, D., & Rao, M. S. (2001). Entrepreneurial behavior of farmers: An axiomatic theory. Ganga Kavery Publishing house, Varanasi, India.

  • Halakatti, S. V., Kamaraddi, K., & Gowda, D. S. M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of dairy farm technologies by rural farm women. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(2), 323-325.

  • Khanka, S.S. (1998). Development of small scale industries in Assam. Yojana, 42(9), 48-54.

  • Lee, A. (1976). A study of small entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship development programmes in Malaysia.

  • Maxwell, J., & Westerfield, D. (2002). Technological entrepreneurship characteristics related to adoption of innovative technology S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 67(1), 9-21.

  • Nandkarni, S. (1982). Women entrepreneurs: socio economic study with reference to Poona. Indian Dissertation Abstracts, 16(8), 317-323.

  • Nandi, A. (1973). Motives, modernity and entrepreneurial competence. Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 127-136.

  • Pandya, R. D. (1995). Entrepreneurial behaviour of sugarcane growers. Indian Journal of Extention Education, 6(4), 1299.

  • Prasad, A. (1988). Entrepreneurial behavior under TRYSEM. Concept publishing Ltd., p. 27.

  • Rosenzweig, M.R. (1995). Why are there returns to schooling? AER: Papers and Proceedings of the American Association, 85, 153-158.

  • Saxena, D., & Tripathi, H. (1998). Entrepreneurial behavior of milk producers according to their social personal, economic and psychological attributes in women’s Dairy cooperatives. IASSI Quarterly,17(2), 41-57.

  • Smith-Hunter, A., Kapp, J., & Yonkers, V. (2003). A psychological model of entrepreneurship. Journal of the Academy of Business and Economics.

  • Subrahmanyeswari, B., Veeraraghava Reddy, K. and Sudhakar Rao, B. (2007). Entrepreneurial behavior of rural women farmers in dairying: A multidimensional analysis. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19, Article #15. Retrieved from http:// www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/1/subr19015.htm.

  • Zahir, M. A. (1994). Entrepreneurship in Punjab: A case study. Yojana, 38(8), 24-28.


Abstract Views: 360

PDF Views: 0




  • Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Women Dairy Farmers of Kerala State-A Socio-Personal Analysis

Abstract Views: 360  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. Reeja George
Department of Veterinary and Ah Extension, Cvas Mannuthy, Thrissur, Kerala, India
T. T. Ranganathan
The Gandigram Rural Institute, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


A study was conducted among 153 women dairy farmers of three districts of Kerala with the objectives of studying the socio-personal profile of women dairy farmers of Kerala state, to identify potential areas for intervention and design of appropriate strategies with a view to improving entrepreneurial traits specifically among women in this sector. Just over one-third (35.30%) of the respondents with one cow unit had low level of education while only 15.68 percent of women with two cow units and 9.80 percent of women with more than two cow units fell in this group. Most of the women in all the three categories had medium level of education (64.05%). Very few women (9.80%) with one cow unit had high level of education. More than half of the women dairy farmers had received trainings. Among women dairy farmers with one cow unit, however more than half had not received any trainings. Nearly 60 percent of those with two cows had received trainings while among respondents with more than two cows the corresponding figure was 68.63 percent. Most of the farm women fell in the two categories up to 50 cents and 51 cents to one acre. Just 5.88 percent of the respondents had land holding above two acres while slightly over 12 percent had land holdings between 1.1 acres and 2 acres. None of the women with one cow unit had land holding above two acres while 7.84 percent of those with two cow units and nearly one tenth of women with more than two cows fell in this category. Nearly half of the respondents (50.98%) with one cow unit had medium level of social participation while the remaining half were nearly equally distributed among the low (25.49%) and high (23.53%) social participation levels. More than half of the women with two cow units (56.86 %) had medium social participation while 27.45 percent and 15.69 percent had high and low social participation respectively.


Keywords


Women Dairy Farmers, Entrepreneurship, Socio-Personal Variables.

References