Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Typology on Entrepreneurship Support in Emerging Markets


Affiliations
1 ULAB School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (ULAB), Dhaka, Bangladesh
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the backdrop of role of business in poverty alleviation, stimulating entrepreneurship by involving the entrepreneurs in forming their ventures has been considered fruitful. In doing so, the crucial factor remains the underlying heterogeneity of entrepreneurs due to their arrays of business requirements to cater to miscellaneous market segments and niches. In this context, the first section delves into the phenomenon of supporting the diversified start-up entrepreneurs (SEs) with their intensely different start-up needs, wants and desires, and focuses on how diversity of entrepreneurship demands diversified services as well. This leads to the broader scenario of why and how the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) develop and change keeping pace with the growing or changing requirements and environments of the start-up entrepreneurs (SEs). Subsequently, section one reveals the underlying research question of the study focusing on the ESCs dealing and configuring with the heterogeneous start-up entrepreneurs (SEs). The study aimed at developing a typology on the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) facilitating services for heterogeneous start-up entrepreneurs (SEs) focusing on the services of ESCS, particularly from the perspective of their configurations. In this context, the general research question explored different configurations of the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) facilitating services for heterogeneous start-up entrepreneurs (SEs).


Adopting a systematic literature review, section two critically reviews a number of relevant papers extracted from the scientific and scholarly databases with regard to entrepreneurship support. Pinpointing theoretical perspectives from several contemporary angles, it reports the state-of-the-art knowledge in supporting the multifaceted entrepreneurship and dynamic start-up entrepreneurs. Spanning from the most obvious to the most cutting-edge ones, this section highlights works on the following theoretical perspectives: knowledge-based and resource-based views, social capital theory, social learning theory, theory of planned behaviour, theory of growth of the firm, Uppsala model of international entrepreneurship, theory of cultural dimensions, and market orientation.


The research has been conducted in the context of Bangladesh due to relevant ground of the study; furthermore, it is angled from the perspective of BiD Network Foundation which contributes to sustainable economic growth in emerging countries through entrepreneurship. Based on this notion, section three elaborates the research context where Bangladesh is an interesting zone for BiD Network and helping the ESCs and SEs of Bangladesh has turned out to be a challenge for it. Thereby, in terms of the methodological aspects of the research, followed by an extensive web search and other contacts, a number of potential ESCs, SEs and entrepreneurship consultants in Bangladesh were selected accordingly. As the nature of the study is qualitative and the underlying approach is theory building, thereby case-by-case in-depth interviews were spotted as the most suitable data collection means. For the analysis, the raw data have been analysed checking the interviews and were organised into a tabular study in a comparative format.

Consequently in section four, the results have been arranged into parts reflecting upon the research questions of this study, and critically analysing the results attempting to answer the research questions chronologically, and thereby leading to the developed theoretical model. Based on the local expert advice of the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) and in consultation with the entrepreneurship consultants (ECs), three groups among the start-up entrepreneurs (SEs) in Bangladesh were distinguished: G1 type of young SEs, G2 type of child SEs, and G3 type of aged SEs. It can be said that although their needs and requirements revolve around few similar areas, i.e. funding, networking, training etc., nevertheless the nature of needs for each of the G1 type of young SEs, G2 type of child SEs, and G3 type of aged SEs are quite tailor-made depending on their different circumstances and personal stories. On the other side, considering the known needs and requirements of the SEs, the ESCs configure themselves in a number of facets, e.g. resource configuration, network configuration, training configuration and structural configuration. The ESCs have similar configuration themes, and depending on their personal circumstances and priorities they differently configure themselves based on the needs and requirements of the SEs. ESCs also adapt to the SEs in various means considering the situation of the respective SEs. Most of the ESCs have agreed upon the need to provide tailor-made services for the SEs showcasing their adaptation nature toward the SEs. Followed by the analysis, the synthesis recollects the emerged patterns together and incorporates into a theoretical model from the standpoint of entrepreneurship support.

Finally, section five discusses the key findings of the research delineating the limitations of the research and implications for BiD Network and the theory. Based on the limitations, the results would be more convincing if other demographic variables including gender and geography comprising direct rural and peripheral zones were added to the research together with multiple and multifaceted data collection methods in addition to interviews. Particularly considering the added contribution of the theoretical model, it can be implied that the needs and requirements of the SEs are fulfilled when the resources of ESCs are up-scaled accordingly-which can be propositioned in future researches. For BiD Network, this model is useful in terms of understanding of the wants of the different groups, how the wants are to be met by the prospective services and the consequences of the desired resources.

To conclude, considering the current scenario of the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) and startup entrepreneurs (SEs), requirements are prominent with the SEs and in line with this, ample resources are lacking with ESCs. The support system which could help the ESCs become up-scaled and fortified in terms of growing demands and necessary resources, is going to be instrumental for the effective entrepreneurship support configurations of the ESCs.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Support, Start-Up Entrepreneurs, Typology.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aghdaie, M. H., Zolfani, S. H., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Market segment evaluation and selection based on application of fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(1), 213-233.
  • Ahmed, K., & Chowdhury, T. A. (2009). Performance evaluation of smes of Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(7), 126-133.
  • Amal, M., & Filho, A. R. F. (2010). Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: A multi case study. European Business Review, 22(6), 608-623.
  • Anwar, S. T., & Tariq, S. M. (2011). Evolution of entrepreneurship and organizational configurations at Zildjian, 1623-2010. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 175-194.
  • Analytictech. (1999). Definitions of Social Capital in the Literature. Analytic Technologies, Lexington, USA. Retrieved from http://www.analytictech.com/networks/definitions_of_social_capital.htm (Accessed on 29 May 2013).
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer series in social Psychology (pp. 11-39). Berlin: Springer.
  • Arnold L. G., & Riley, J. G. (2013). On the viability of group lending when microfinance meets the market: A reconsideration of the besley-coate model. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 12(1), 59-106.
  • Audretsch, D., & Aldridge, T. (2012). Transnational social capital and scientist entrepreneurship. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 369-376.
  • Ayres, R. U., & Williams, E. (2004). The digital economy: Where do we stand? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(4), 315-339.
  • Bahmani, S., Galindo, M. A., & Mendez, M. T. (2012). Non-profit organizations, entrepreneurship, social capital and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 38(3), 271-281.
  • Baird, R., Hedinger, H., & Seekins, C. (2012). Bridging the gap: The role of accelerators in impact investing. Atlanta, Village Capital.
  • Bandura, A. (1968). A social learning interpretation of psychological dysfunctions. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 293-344.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
  • Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2010). Social capital access and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(3), 821-833.
  • Bishop, P. (2012). Knowledge, diversity and entrepreneurship: A spatial analysis of new firm formation in Great Britain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(7-8), 641-660.
  • Boehe, D. M. (2009). Brazilian software SME’s export propensity: Bridging “Born Global” and stage approaches. Latin American Business Review, 10(2-3): 187-216.
  • Borges, C., Hashimoto, M., & Coelho, R. L. F. (2013). To plan or not to plan? An analysis of the impact of planning on the disbanding or growth of Brazilian startups. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 18(3), 349-367.
  • Bullough, A., & Renko, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times. Business Horizons, 56(3), 343-350.
  • Business in Development (BiD) Network (2011). BiD Network Fact Sheet, Preparing Emerging Market Entrepreneurs for Investors. Amsterdam, BiD Network Foundation.
  • Calton, J. M., Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., & Bevan, D. (2013). Building partnerships to create social and economic value at the base of the global development pyramid. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-13.
  • Carlisle, S., Kunc, M., Jones, E., & Tiffin, S. (2013). Supporting innovation for tourism development through multi-stakeholder approaches: Experiences from Africa. Tourism Management, 35, 59-69.
  • Che, D., & Shen, L. (2013). The co-development of economies and institutions. Economics of Transition, 21(2), 241-268.
  • Christiansen, J. D. (2009). A framework for developing seed accelerator programmes. Judge Business School & Jesus College. Cambridge, University of Cambridge. MBA Dissertation.
  • CostanzaTorri, M. (2012). Community gender entrepreneurship and self-help groups: A way forward to foster social capital and truly effective forms of participation among rural poor women? Community Development Journal, 47(1), 58-76.
  • Cowton, C. J. (2004). Managing financial performance at an ethical investment fund. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(2), 249-275.
  • Curry, G. N., & Koczberski, G. (2012). Relational economies, social embeddedness and valuing labour in Agrarian change: An example from the developing world. Geographical Research, 50(4), 377-392.
  • Dinda, S. (2008). Social capital in the creation of human capital and economic growth: A productive consumption approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 2020-2033.
  • Dodgson, M. (2011). Exploring new combinations in innovation and entrepreneurship: Social networks, schumpeter, and the case of Josiah Wedgwood (1730-1795). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(4), 1119-1151.
  • Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(3), 479-504.
  • Feng, B., Yao, T., et al. (2013). Analysis of the market-based adjustable outsourcing contract under uncertainties. Production and Operations Management, 22(1), 178-188.
  • Finlay-Robinson, D. (2013). Change and opportunity: The role of leaders and SMEs in creating new business futures. Development and Learning in Organisations, 27(3), 5-7.
  • Fritsch, M., & Noseleit, F. (2013). Investigating the anatomy of the employment effect of new business formation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(2), 349-377.
  • Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., et al. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455-478.
  • Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., et al. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: Differences among American, Asian and European students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 219-238.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109-122.
  • Heinonen, J., Hytti, U., et al. (2010). The context matters: Understanding the evolution of Finnish and Irish entrepreneurship policies. Management Research Review, 33(12), 1158-1173.
  • Hoffman, D. L., & Radojevich-Kelley, N. (2012). Analysis of accelerator companies: An exploratory case study of their programs, Processes, and Early Results. Small Business Institute® Journal 8(2): 54-70.
  • Holt, D. H. (1997). A comparative study of values among Chinese and U.S. entrepreneurs: Pragmatic convergence between contrasting cultures. Journal of Business Venturing 12(6): 483-505.
  • Holtbrugge, D. & Baron, A. (2013). “Market Entry Strategies in Emerging Markets: An Institutional Study in the BRIC Countries.” Thunderbird International Business Review 55(3): 237-252.
  • Huijgevoort, T. V. (2012). The ‘Business Accelerator’: Just a Different Name for a Business Incubator? Utrecht School of Economics. Utrecht, Utrecht University. Bachelor Thesis.
  • I-DEV International (2012). Feasibility research on developing inclusive business incubator/accelerator in Cajamarca. ANDE CDO Working Group Incubator / Accelerator Presentation. New York, I-DEV International.
  • Ingenbleek, P. T. M., Tessema, W. K., et al. (2013). “Conducting field research in subsistence markets, with an application to market orientation in the context of Ethiopian pastoralists.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 30(1): 83-97.
  • Javalgi, R. R. G., Todd, P. R., et al. (2012). Entrepreneurship, muddling through, and Indian Internet-enabled SMEs. Journal of Business Research 29(2012): 740-744.
  • Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (2013). Entrepreneurship as a leap of faith. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion10(1) 37-65.
  • Karippacheril, T. G., Nikayin, F., et al. (2013). Serving the poor: Multisided mobile service platforms, openness, competition, collaboration and the struggle for leadership. Telecommunications Policy, 37(1), 24-34.
  • Khavul, S., Chavez, H., et al. (2013). When institutional change outruns the change agent: The contested terrain of entrepreneurial microfinance for those in poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 30-50.
  • Kistruck, G. M., Beamish, P. M., et al. (2013). Social intermediation in base-of-the-pyramid markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 31-66.
  • Knight, M. (2013). New markets must be conquered: Race, gender, and the embodiment of entrepreneurship within texts. Canadian Geographer.
  • Kocak, A., & Abimbola, T. (2009). The effects of entrepreneurial marketing on born global performance. International Marketing Review, 26(4/5): 439-452.
  • Kraus, S., Kauranen, I., et al. (2011). Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach. Management Research Review, 34(1), 58-74.
  • Lau, V. P., Dimitrova, M.N., et al. (2012). Entrepreneurial readiness and firm growth: An integrated etic and emic approach. Journal of International Management, 18(2), 147-159.
  • Lee, S. H., Peng, M. W., et al. (2013). Governments, entrepreneurs, and positive externalities: A real options perspective. European Management Journal, 31(4), 333-347.
  • Lerner, M., Brush, C., et al. (1997). Israeli women entrepreneurs: An examination of factors affecting performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(4), 315-339.
  • Li, B., Kuberczyk, H., et al. (2012). The Explosive Growth of Business Accelerators in Los Angeles in 2012. California, California Institute of Technology.
  • Li, S., Schulze, W. et al. (2009). “Plunging into the sea, again? A study of serial entrepreneurship in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4), 667-680.
  • Light, I., & Dana, L. P. (2013). Boundaries of social capital in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(3), 603-624.
  • Linton, J., & Walsh, S. (2013). The effect of technology on learning during the acquisition and development of competencies in technology-intensive small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(2), 165-186.
  • Ma, Z., Zhao, S., et al. (2013). An overview of contemporary ethnic entrepreneurship studies: Themes and relationships. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(1), 32-52.
  • Matthews, R. L., & Marzec, P. E. (2012). Social capital, a theory for operations management: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 50(24), 7081-7099.
  • McCall, S. (1975). Quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 2(2), 229-248.
  • McGaughey, S. L., Kumaraswamy, A., et al. (2013). Journal of World Business special issue: Institutions, entrepreneurship and co-evolution in international business. Journal of World Business, 48(2), 282-283.
  • McGoodwin, J. R. (2007). Effects of climatic variability on three fishing economies in high-latitude regions: Implications for fisheries policies. Marine Policy, 31(1), 40-55.
  • Mintoo, A. A. (2006). SMEs in Bangladesh. CACCI Journal, 1(2006), 1-19.
  • Moazzem, K. G. (2008). Strategies for Entrepreneurship Development in Bangladesh: Unleashing the Potentials of SMEs. Dhaka, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
  • Moni, M. H. (2006). Japan-Bangladesh economic partnership: Focus on aid, trade and investments. International Studies, 43(4), 395-410.
  • Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., et al. (2013). “Do International Networks and Foreign Market Knowledge Facilitate SME Internationalization? Evidence From the Czech Republic.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.
  • Nasution, H. N., Mavondo, F. T., et al. (2011). Entrepreneurship: Its relationship with market orientation and learning orientation and as antecedents to innovation and customer value. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 336-345.
  • Nayak, A., & Maclean, M. (2013). Co-evolution, opportunity seeking and institutional change: Entrepreneurship and the Indian telecommunications industry, 1923-2009. Business History, 55(1), 29-52.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013). DAC List of ODA Recipients. Paris, OECD.
  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New York.
  • Percoco, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Institutions: Evidence from Italy. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(3), 339-355.
  • Pirolo, L., & Presutti, M. (2010). The impact of social capital on the start-ups’ performance growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 197-227.
  • Ponchione, C. (2013). Exploring a metamorphosis: Identity formation for an emerging conductor. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12(2-3), 181-193.
  • Poon, J. P. H., Thai, D. T., et al. (2012). “Social capital and female entrepreneurship in rural regions: Evidence from Vietnam. Applied Geography, 35(1-2): 308-315.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy and Business, 26(first quarter 2002), 1-14.
  • Price, R. (2004). The role of service providers in establishing networked regional business accelerators in Utah. Int. J. Technology Management, 27(5), 265-274.
  • Puri, M., & Robinson, D. T. (2013). The economic psychology of entrepreneurship and family business. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 22(2), 423-444.
  • Putnam, R. D (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and economic growth, p 4.
  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2013). Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence. Research Policy, 42(5), 1015-1038.
  • Sanders, T., & Jong, M. D. (2010). Business Angels: To create a network of business angel groups in Indonesia. Amsterdam, BiD Network Foundation.
  • Santarelli, E., & Tran, H. T. (2013). The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: The case of Vietnam. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 435-458.
  • Sanyang, S. E., & Huang, W. C. (2010). Entrepreneurship and economic development: The EMPRETEC showcase. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 317-329.
  • Senik, Z. C., Scott-Ladd, B., Entrekin, L., & Adham, K. A. (2011). Networking and internationalization of SMEs in emerging economies. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 9, 259-281.
  • Sigfusson, T., & Chetty, S. (2013). Building international entrepreneurial virtual networks in cyberspace. Journal of World Business, 48(2), 260-270.
  • Sleuwaegen, L., & J. Onkelinx (2013). International commitment, post-entry growth and survival of international new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing.
  • Steph, B. (2012). The Rise of the Business Accelerators. Ohio, LaunchHouse, Angel Investment & Seed Capital Fund.
  • Strobl, A., & Peters, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial reputation in destination networks. Annals of Tourism Research, 40(1), 59-82.
  • Thakur, S. P. (1999). Size of investment, opportunity choice and human resources in new venture growth: Some typologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 283-309.
  • Tipu, S. A. A., & Arain, F. M. (2011). Managing success factors in entrepreneurial ventures: A behavioral approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 17(5), 534-560.
  • Toledo-Lopez, A., Diaz-Pichardo, R., et al. (2012). Defining success in subsistence businesses. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1658-1664.
  • Tracey, P., Phillips, N. et al. (2010). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60-80.
  • Ullah, M. A. (2006). SMEs in Bangladesh and their financing: An analysis and some recommendations. The Cost and Management, 34(3), 57-72.
  • Urban, B. (2011). Entrepreneurial networking differences: An ethnic in-group and out-group analysis. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1).
  • Vanroose, A., & D’Espallier, B. (2013). Do microfinance institutions accomplish their mission? Evidence from the relationship between traditional financial sector development and microfinance institutions’ outreach and performance. Applied Economics, 45(15), 1965-1982.
  • Viswanathan, M., & Rosa, J. A. (2010). Understanding subsistence marketplaces: Toward sustainable consumption and commerce for a better world. Journal of Business Research, 63(special issue): 535-537.
  • Viswanathan, M., Sridharan, S., Ritchie, R., Venugopal, S., & Jung, K. (2012). Marketing interactions in subsistence marketplaces: A bottom-up approach to designing public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(2), 159-177.
  • Wahba, J., & Zenou, Y. (2012). Out of sight, out of mind: Migration, entrepreneurship and social capital. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(5), 890-903.
  • Wallis, V. (2006). Vision and strategy: Questioning the subsistence perspective. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 17(4), 38-43.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
  • Westlund, H., & Gawell, M. (2012). Building social capital for social entrepreneurship. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 101-116.
  • Wheale, P. R., & Amin, L. H. (2003). Bursting the dot.com bubble: A case study in investor behavior. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(1), 117-136.
  • Wiggins, J., & Gibson, D. V. (2003). Overview of US incubators and the case of the Austin technology incubator. Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3(1/2), 56-66.
  • Williams, C. C., & Rodgers, P. (2012). Evaluating the persistence of subsistence work in contemporary economies: Some lessons from Moscow. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(9), 721-737.
  • Wissink, B. (2013). Enclave urbanism in Mumbai: An Actor-Network-Theory analysis of urban (dis)connection. Geoforum, 47, 1-11.
  • Woolley, J. L. (2013). The Creation and Configuration of Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship in Emerging Domains of Activity. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.
  • World Bank. (2011). Lessons on Virtual Business Incubation Services. The World Bank and International Finance Corporation Research, Zeist (The Netherlands), Tridos Facet.
  • Zhao, W., Ritchie, J. R. B., & Echtner, C.M. (2011). Social capital and tourism entrepreneurship. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1570-1583.

Abstract Views: 247

PDF Views: 0




  • Typology on Entrepreneurship Support in Emerging Markets

Abstract Views: 247  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Iftekhar Ul Karim
ULAB School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (ULAB), Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract


In the backdrop of role of business in poverty alleviation, stimulating entrepreneurship by involving the entrepreneurs in forming their ventures has been considered fruitful. In doing so, the crucial factor remains the underlying heterogeneity of entrepreneurs due to their arrays of business requirements to cater to miscellaneous market segments and niches. In this context, the first section delves into the phenomenon of supporting the diversified start-up entrepreneurs (SEs) with their intensely different start-up needs, wants and desires, and focuses on how diversity of entrepreneurship demands diversified services as well. This leads to the broader scenario of why and how the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) develop and change keeping pace with the growing or changing requirements and environments of the start-up entrepreneurs (SEs). Subsequently, section one reveals the underlying research question of the study focusing on the ESCs dealing and configuring with the heterogeneous start-up entrepreneurs (SEs). The study aimed at developing a typology on the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) facilitating services for heterogeneous start-up entrepreneurs (SEs) focusing on the services of ESCS, particularly from the perspective of their configurations. In this context, the general research question explored different configurations of the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) facilitating services for heterogeneous start-up entrepreneurs (SEs).


Adopting a systematic literature review, section two critically reviews a number of relevant papers extracted from the scientific and scholarly databases with regard to entrepreneurship support. Pinpointing theoretical perspectives from several contemporary angles, it reports the state-of-the-art knowledge in supporting the multifaceted entrepreneurship and dynamic start-up entrepreneurs. Spanning from the most obvious to the most cutting-edge ones, this section highlights works on the following theoretical perspectives: knowledge-based and resource-based views, social capital theory, social learning theory, theory of planned behaviour, theory of growth of the firm, Uppsala model of international entrepreneurship, theory of cultural dimensions, and market orientation.


The research has been conducted in the context of Bangladesh due to relevant ground of the study; furthermore, it is angled from the perspective of BiD Network Foundation which contributes to sustainable economic growth in emerging countries through entrepreneurship. Based on this notion, section three elaborates the research context where Bangladesh is an interesting zone for BiD Network and helping the ESCs and SEs of Bangladesh has turned out to be a challenge for it. Thereby, in terms of the methodological aspects of the research, followed by an extensive web search and other contacts, a number of potential ESCs, SEs and entrepreneurship consultants in Bangladesh were selected accordingly. As the nature of the study is qualitative and the underlying approach is theory building, thereby case-by-case in-depth interviews were spotted as the most suitable data collection means. For the analysis, the raw data have been analysed checking the interviews and were organised into a tabular study in a comparative format.

Consequently in section four, the results have been arranged into parts reflecting upon the research questions of this study, and critically analysing the results attempting to answer the research questions chronologically, and thereby leading to the developed theoretical model. Based on the local expert advice of the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) and in consultation with the entrepreneurship consultants (ECs), three groups among the start-up entrepreneurs (SEs) in Bangladesh were distinguished: G1 type of young SEs, G2 type of child SEs, and G3 type of aged SEs. It can be said that although their needs and requirements revolve around few similar areas, i.e. funding, networking, training etc., nevertheless the nature of needs for each of the G1 type of young SEs, G2 type of child SEs, and G3 type of aged SEs are quite tailor-made depending on their different circumstances and personal stories. On the other side, considering the known needs and requirements of the SEs, the ESCs configure themselves in a number of facets, e.g. resource configuration, network configuration, training configuration and structural configuration. The ESCs have similar configuration themes, and depending on their personal circumstances and priorities they differently configure themselves based on the needs and requirements of the SEs. ESCs also adapt to the SEs in various means considering the situation of the respective SEs. Most of the ESCs have agreed upon the need to provide tailor-made services for the SEs showcasing their adaptation nature toward the SEs. Followed by the analysis, the synthesis recollects the emerged patterns together and incorporates into a theoretical model from the standpoint of entrepreneurship support.

Finally, section five discusses the key findings of the research delineating the limitations of the research and implications for BiD Network and the theory. Based on the limitations, the results would be more convincing if other demographic variables including gender and geography comprising direct rural and peripheral zones were added to the research together with multiple and multifaceted data collection methods in addition to interviews. Particularly considering the added contribution of the theoretical model, it can be implied that the needs and requirements of the SEs are fulfilled when the resources of ESCs are up-scaled accordingly-which can be propositioned in future researches. For BiD Network, this model is useful in terms of understanding of the wants of the different groups, how the wants are to be met by the prospective services and the consequences of the desired resources.

To conclude, considering the current scenario of the entrepreneurship support centres (ESCs) and startup entrepreneurs (SEs), requirements are prominent with the SEs and in line with this, ample resources are lacking with ESCs. The support system which could help the ESCs become up-scaled and fortified in terms of growing demands and necessary resources, is going to be instrumental for the effective entrepreneurship support configurations of the ESCs.

Keywords


Entrepreneurship Support, Start-Up Entrepreneurs, Typology.

References