Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Agriculture vs. Livestock: A Study of Kumoun Region of Uttarakhand
Subscribe/Renew Journal
This paper is an attempt to analyze the best investment opportunity for the farmers of the Kumoun region of Uttarakhand. The 2 most approachable activities i.e. agricultural activities and livestock-related activities have been considered for the same. It compares the investment and returns earned by the farmers through agricultural and livestock farming. The study also analyses the risk and return profile of such activities. This paper utilises the Net Present Value method to identify the best investment decision for farmers between these 2 farming activities. To determine the present value factor, the concept of the time value of money is utilised. The data was collected from primary and secondary sources. Primary data was collected with the help of a structured questionnaire and focused group discussion and secondary data was collected through various Government websites, magazines, etc. The study found that livestock activities are more beneficial for farmers in comparison to other agricultural activities. The study also found that the agricultural activities have a high-risk, fluctuating return profile due to climatic conditions, too much intermediary’s involvement, wild animal problems, lack of resources, lack of training facilities, uncertainties etc. The livestock activities have a low-risk, stable return profile due to several factors like one-time investment, easy quality maintenance, less involvement of the intermediaries in the selling process, certainty etc. The study has contributed to the development of the rural economy, return migrants, unemployed individuals, policy makers and researchers.
Keywords
Agriculture, Capital Budgeting, Livestock, Net Present Value
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Belli, P., & Guerrero, R. P. (2009). Quality of economic analysis in investment projects approved in 2007 and 2008. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank. Washington, DC, USA.
- Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Bosri, R. (2016). Evaluation of managerial techniques: NPV and IRR. UITS Journal, 5(1).
- Doramas, J. et al. (2013). The economic appraisal of investment projects at the EIB. European Investment Bank. Kirchberg, Luxemburg.
- Imegi, J. C., & Nwokoye, G. A. (2015). The effectiveness of capital budgeting techniques in evaluating projects’ profitability. African Research Review, 9(2).
- Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy mathematical models in Engineering and Management Science. Elsevier Science Publishers. North-Holland, Amsterdam, N.Y.
- Kiruthika, N. (2013). Investment and returns in Indian agricultural research: A theoretical investigation. Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences, 3(1), 26-30.
- Lingesiys, K. (2016). Capital budgeting theory and practice: A review and agenda for future research. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(1).
- Maruf, H. (2012). Capital budgeting techniques used by small manufacturing companies. Journal of Service Science and Management, 6(1), 38-45.
- Mishan, E. J., & Quah, E. (2007). Cost-benefit analysis (5th ed.). CRC Press.
- Panwar, M. S., & Upreti, P. (2015). Reservoir induced impact on agricultural patterns and livelihood practices: A case study of Pratapnagar block in Tehri dam rim area. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(8).
- Partap, T. (2011). Hill agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(1), 33-52.
- Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Sean, A. W. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impact, adaptation, and mitigation. Journal of Climate Risk Management, 16, 145-163.
- Sah, R. (2017). Changing land use pattern in Uttarakhand. Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 4(1), 50-59.
- Sate, V. P. (2016). Livestock farming in the Uttarakhand Himalaya, India: Use pattern and potentiality. Current Science, 111(12), 1955-1960.
Abstract Views: 205
PDF Views: 0