Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perceptive Differences in Social Responsibility among Executives and Management Students.


Affiliations
1 Oriental Institute Of Management, Vashi, Navi Mumbai., India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


As corporate social responsibility is receiving increased attention by company stakeholders, researchers are also increasingly exploring corporate social responsibility, its causes and implications. This study is a qualitative research done to explore the link between the management students, and executive's perception of corporate social responsibility and its relationship with underlying factors such as volunteering in social awareness task, campaign against social ill, devoting some time for the social cause, etc. The study found that the ongoing management students attach more importance to the non economic aspects than the executives actually working in the organizations. The Executives are more inclined towards facilitating payment to get work done and fulfilling the legal obligations. The Management students stress more on philanthropy. In the choice of business goal there is little difference between the two groups. At the end we have attempted to present a model on the basis of study to fill the gap.

Keywords

Socially Responsible Behavior, Awareness, Environment Laws, Philanthropy
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Brammer, S. (2005). Teaching Corporate Responsibility in Education. Corporate Responsibility Management, 2, pp. 4-5.
  • Checkland, P. & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • WBC. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBC): Geneva.
  • Co'rdoba, J. R. & Campbell, T. (2008). Systems Research and Behavioral Science System Res.25, (pp. 427-437). Wiley Inter Science. DOI:10.1002/sres.898.
  • Carrol, A. B. (1979). A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), pp. 183-188.
  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 497-505.
  • Chapple, W. & Moon, J. (2007). CSR Agendas for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), pp. 183-188.
  • Grace, D. & Cohen, S. (2005). Business Ethics: Australian Problems and Cases. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • McMahon, T. F. (1986). Models of the Relationship of the Firm to Society. Journal of Business Ethics, 5, pp. 181-191.
  • Welford, R. (2007). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Issues for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(1), pp. 42-51.

Abstract Views: 270

PDF Views: 0




  • Perceptive Differences in Social Responsibility among Executives and Management Students.

Abstract Views: 270  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shakti Awasthi
Oriental Institute Of Management, Vashi, Navi Mumbai., India

Abstract


As corporate social responsibility is receiving increased attention by company stakeholders, researchers are also increasingly exploring corporate social responsibility, its causes and implications. This study is a qualitative research done to explore the link between the management students, and executive's perception of corporate social responsibility and its relationship with underlying factors such as volunteering in social awareness task, campaign against social ill, devoting some time for the social cause, etc. The study found that the ongoing management students attach more importance to the non economic aspects than the executives actually working in the organizations. The Executives are more inclined towards facilitating payment to get work done and fulfilling the legal obligations. The Management students stress more on philanthropy. In the choice of business goal there is little difference between the two groups. At the end we have attempted to present a model on the basis of study to fill the gap.

Keywords


Socially Responsible Behavior, Awareness, Environment Laws, Philanthropy

References