Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessing Scale Reliability and Validity: Measurement of Consumer Based Brand Equity in Indian Luxury Market


Affiliations
1 Jaipuria Institute of Management, A-32A, Sector- 62, Noida (U.P), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The current study seeks to examine the measurement of customer-based brand equity (CBBE) in the Indian luxury apparel market. Based on Aaker's (1991) conceptual framework of brand equity, this study uses factor analysis (both exploratory and confirmatory) for testing the reliability and validity consumer based brand equity scale. The study is based on a sample of 520 consumers from cities of Delhi, Faridabad, Noida, Chandigarh and Gurgaon who evaluated international luxury apparel brands in India. Based upon literature review, the customer-based brand equity (CBBE) scale was designed and tested to ensure validity and reliability. The empirical findings suggest that customer based brand equity consists of four dimensions and that Aaker's model of CBBE is generally supported. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed. The study concludes with directions for future research.

Keywords

Brand Equity, Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE), Brand Loyalty, Brand Association, Brand Awareness, Perceived Quality.
User
Notifications

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, The Free Press, New York, NY.

  • Aaker, D. A. (1996), Building Strong Brands, The Free Press, New York, NY.

  • Aaker, D. A. and Keller, K. L. (1990), Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions, Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 27-41.

  • Agarwal, M. K. and Rao, V. (1996), An Empirical Comparison of Consumer Based Measures of Brand Equity, Marketing Letters, 7(3): 237-247.

  • Ambler, T. (2003), Marketing and the Bottom Line (2nd Ed), FT/Prentice-Hall, London, UK.

  • Ambler, T., Kokkinaki, F. and Puntoni, S. (2004), Assessing Marketing Performance: Reasons for Metrics Selection, Journal of Marketing Management, 20: 475-498.

  • Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin 103: 411-423.

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1994), Principles of Marketing Research, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

  • Bentler, P. M. and Bonnet, D. C. (1980), Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88(3): 588-606.

  • Campbell, D. T, (1960), Recommendations for APA Test Standards Regarding Construct, Trait, or Discriminant Validity, American Psychologist, 15: 546-53.

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr, (1979), A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 16: 64-73.

  • Cobb-Walgren, C.J., Beal, C. and Donthu, N. (1995), Brand Equity, Brand Preferences, and Purchase Intent, Journal of Advertising, 24(3): 25-40.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951), Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika, 16(3): 297-334.

  • Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K.(2000), Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods, Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2): 60-71.

  • Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B. (1979), The World of Goods, Allen Lane, London, UK.

  • Dubois, B. and Duquesne, P. (1993), The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture, European Journal of Marketing, 27(1): 35-44.

  • Erdem, T. and Swait, J. (1998), Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2): 131-157.

  • Fornell, C. and Bookstein, F. L. (1982), Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory, Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4): 440-453.

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981), Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.

  • Garfein, R. T. (1989), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Dynamics of Prestige, Journal of Services Marketing, 3: 17–24.

  • Grossman, G. M. and Shapiro, C. (1988), Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1): 79-100.

  • Groth, J. C. and McDaniel, S. W. (1993), The Exclusive Value Principle: the Basis for Prestige Pricing, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(1): 10-16.

  • Hananto, A. (2006), Developing and Assessing the Reliability and Validity of an Alternative Scale to Measure Brand Equity. Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2011, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=946303.

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. R. (2008), Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1): 53-60.

  • Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999), Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1): 1-55.

  • Kaiser, S. B. (1990), The Social Psychology of Apparel (2nd Ed), Macmillan, New York, NY.

  • Keller, K. L. (1993), Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity, Journal of Marketing, 57(1): 1-22.

  • Kline, R. B. (2005), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Ed), The Guilford Press, New York, NY.

  • Laurent, G. and Dubois, B. (1993), Motivation for Buying Luxury Products and Top of the Range Products: Developing Empirical Scales, 22nd EMAC Conference, Barcelona, 1595-1598.

  • Leuthesser, L, Kohli, C. H. and Harich, K. (1995), Brand Equity: The Halo Effect Measure, European Journal of Marketing, 29: 5769.

  • Mason, R., (1996), Measuring the Demand for Status Goods: An Evaluation of Means-end Chains and Laddering, European Advances for Consumer Research, 78-82.

  • Novak, T. P. and MacEvoy, B. (1990), On Comparing Alternative Segmentation Schemes: The List of Values and Lifestyles, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1): 105-109.

  • Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994), Psychometric Theory (3rd Ed), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

  • O’Shaugnessey, J. (1987), Why People Buy, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

  • Park, C. S. and Srinivasan, V. (1994), A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and its Extendibility, Journal of Marketing Research, 31: 271-288.

  • Peter, J. P. (1981), Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices, Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 133-45, Quelch, J. A. (1987), Marketing the Premium Product, Business Horizons, 30(3): 38-45.

  • Rajh, E. (2005), The Effects of Marketing Mix, Elements on Brand Equity, 102: 30-59.

  • Rosen, S. (1987), Survey Research in the People’s Republic of China: Some Methodological Problems, Canadian and International Education, 16(1): 190-197.

  • Rossiter, J. R. and Percy, L. (1987), Advertising and Promotion Management, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

  • Schoell, W. F. and Guiltinan, J. P. (1990), Marketing Contemporary Concepts and Practices, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

  • Sinha, A. and Pappu, R. (1998), Parceling of the Sub Components of Consumer-Based Brand Equity Using Factorial Survey: An Empirical Investigation in the New Zealand Consumer Electronics Sector, Proceedings, Australia New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC), University of Otago, Dunedin, December, 2433-8.

  • Sinha, A., Leszeczyc, P. P. and Pappu, R. (2000), Measuring Customer Based Brand Equity: a Survey-Based Methodology Using Hierarchical Bayes Model, in Gregory, G. T. and Murphy, P. E. (Eds), Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, 11, AMA Educators’ Proceedings, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, August, 156-7.

  • Steiger, J. H. (2007), Understanding the Limitations of Global Fit Assessment in Structural Equation Modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5): 893-98.

  • Vickers, S. J. and Renand, F. (2003), The Marketing of Luxury Goods: An Exploratory Study –Three Conceptual Dimensions, The Marketing Review, 3: 459-478.

  • Vigneron F. and Johnson, L. W. (1999), A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-Seeking Consumer Behavior, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3(1): 1-15.

  • Vigneron, F. and Johnson, L. (2004), Measuring Perceptions of Brand Luxury, Brand Management, 11(6): 484-506.

  • Villarejo-Ramos, A.F. and Sánchez-Franco., M. J. (2005), The Impact of Marketing Communication and Price Promotion on Brand Equity, The Journal of Brand Management, 12(6): 431-444.

  • Washburn, J. H. and Plank, R. E. (2002), Measuring Brand Equity: An Evaluation of a Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(1): 46-62.

  • Yoo, B. and Donthu, N. (2001), Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale, Journal of Business Research, 52: 1-14.

  • Yoo, B. and Donthu, N. (2002), Testing Cross-Cultural Invariance of the Brand Equity Creation Process, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(6): 380-98.

  • Yoo, B., Donthu, N. and Lee, S. (2000), An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2): 195-211.


Abstract Views: 512

PDF Views: 10




  • Assessing Scale Reliability and Validity: Measurement of Consumer Based Brand Equity in Indian Luxury Market

Abstract Views: 512  |  PDF Views: 10

Authors

Rajesh Sharma
Jaipuria Institute of Management, A-32A, Sector- 62, Noida (U.P), India

Abstract


The current study seeks to examine the measurement of customer-based brand equity (CBBE) in the Indian luxury apparel market. Based on Aaker's (1991) conceptual framework of brand equity, this study uses factor analysis (both exploratory and confirmatory) for testing the reliability and validity consumer based brand equity scale. The study is based on a sample of 520 consumers from cities of Delhi, Faridabad, Noida, Chandigarh and Gurgaon who evaluated international luxury apparel brands in India. Based upon literature review, the customer-based brand equity (CBBE) scale was designed and tested to ensure validity and reliability. The empirical findings suggest that customer based brand equity consists of four dimensions and that Aaker's model of CBBE is generally supported. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed. The study concludes with directions for future research.

Keywords


Brand Equity, Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE), Brand Loyalty, Brand Association, Brand Awareness, Perceived Quality.

References