Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Are Trade-off and Pecking Order Theories of Capital Structure Mutually Exclusive?


Affiliations
1 T.A. Pai Management Institute Manipal-576104 (Karnataka)
2 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur-721302
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The objective of the paper is to find out whether the trade-off and pecking order theories are mutually exclusive or complimentary to each other in determining the optimal capital structure of the Indian manufacturing companies during the period 1993-94 to 2007-08. We find that the trade-off and pecking order theories are complimentary to each other to determine the capital structure and therefore, companies' financing behavior is best explained by the modified pecking order theory. We also find that Indian manufacturing companies do have target leverage ratios and the adjustment speed towards the target has been around 40 percent.

Keywords

Trade-off Theory, Modified Pecking Order Theory, Target Leverage Ratio, Adjustment Speed
User
Notifications

  • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991), Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, The Review of Economics Studies, 58: 277-297.

  • Barclay, M. and Smith, C. (2005), The Capital Structure Puzzle: The Evidence Revisited, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17: 8-17.

  • Bhole, L. (1980), Determinants of Corporate Financing Structure, in Joshi, N. C. and Kesary, V. G. (Eds), Readings in Management,Wheeler, Allahabad.

  • Bhole, L. (2000), Financing of the Private Cor porate Sector : Trends, Issues and Policies, Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai.

  • Bontempi, M. (2002), The Dynamic Specification of the Modified Pecking Order Theory: Its Relevance to Italy, Empirical Economics,27: 1-22.

  • Cobham, D. and Subramaniam, R. (1998), Corporate Finance in Developing Countries: New Evidences for India, World Development,26: 1033-1047.

  • Cotei, C. and Farhat, J. (2009), The Trade-off Theory and the Pecking Order Theory: Are They Mutually Exclusive? North American Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 3: 1-16.

  • Dasgupta, S. and Ying, C. (2001), Testing Capital Structure Theories: The Evidence from India, HKUST Business School working paper.

  • De Miguel, A. and Pindado, J. (2001), Determinants of Capital Structure: New Evidence from Spanish Panel Data, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7: 77-99.

  • Fama, E. and French, K. (2002), Testing Trade-off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt, Review of Financial Studies, 15: 1-33.

  • Fama, E. and French, K. (2005), Financing Decisions: Who Issues Stock, Journal of Financial Economics, 76: 549-582.

  • Fisher, E., Heinkel, R. and Zechner, J. (1989), Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests, Journal of Finance, 44: 19-40.

  • Flannery, M. and Rangan, K. (2006), Partial Adjustment towards Target Capital Structures, Journal of Financial Economics, 79: 459-506.

  • Frank, M. and Goyal, V. (2003), Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 67: 217-248.

  • Gracia, J. and Mira, F. (2008), Testing Trade-off and Pecking Order Theories Financing SMEs, Small Business Economics, 31: 117-136.

  • Harris, M, and Raviv, A. (1991), The Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, 46: 297-355.

  • Heshmati, A. (2001), The Dynamics of Capital Structure: Evidence from Swedish Micro and Small Firms, Research in Banking and Finance, 2: 199-241.

  • Hovakimian, A., Opler, T. and Titman, S. (2001), The Debt-Equity Choice, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36: 1-24.

  • Huang, R. and Ritter, J. (2009), Testing Theories of Capital Structure and Estimating the Speed of Adjustment, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44: 237-271.

  • Jalilvand, A. and Harris, R. (1984), Corporate Behavior in Adjustment to Capital Structure and Dividend Targets: An Econometric Study, Journal of Finance, 39: 127145.

  • Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.

  • Jensen, M. (1986), Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers, American Economic Review, 76: 323-329.

  • Leary, M. and Roberts, M. (2005), Do Firms Rebalance their Capital Structure? Journal of Finance, 60: 2575-2619.

  • Lööf, H.(2004), Dynamic Optimal Capital Structure and Technical Change, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15: 449-468.

  • Mahakud, J. and Bhole, L. (2003), Determinants of Corporate Capital Structure in India: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 9: 41-53.

  • Mahakud, J. (2006), Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure: Evidence from the Indian Corporate Sector, The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 12: 16-26.

  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958), The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment, American Economic Review, 48: 655-669.

  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1963), Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction, American Economic Review 53: 433-443.

  • Myers, S. (1977), Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, 5: 147-175.

  • Myers, S. (1984), The Capital Structure Puzzle, Journal of Finance, 39: 575-592.

  • Myers, S. and Majluf, N. (1984), Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13: 187-224.

  • Rajan, R. and Zingales, L. (1995), What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data, Journal of Finance, 50: 1421-1460.

  • Rajbhandary, A. (1997), Capital Structure of Firms in Developing Countries: Results for India, unpublished manuscript.

  • Samuel, C. (1996), The Stock Market as a Source of Finance, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 1592, World Bank, Washinton DC.

  • Singh, A. and Hamid, J. (1992), Corporate Financial Structures in Developing Countries, International Finance Corporation Technical Paper, World Bank, Washinton DC.

  • Singh, A. (1995), Corporate Financing Patterns in Industrialized Economies: A Comparative International Study, International Finance Corporation Technical Paper, No. 2, World Bank, Washinton DC.

  • Shyam-Sunder, L. and Myers, S. (1999), Testing Static Trade-off against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 51: 219-244.

  • Warner, J. (1977), Bankruptcy, Absolute Priority, and the Pricing of Risky Debt Claims, Journal of Financial Economics, 4: 239-276.

  • Welch, I. (2004), Capital Structure and Stock Returns, Journal of Political Economy, 112: 106-131.


Abstract Views: 1142

PDF Views: 1




  • Are Trade-off and Pecking Order Theories of Capital Structure Mutually Exclusive?

Abstract Views: 1142  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Sulagna Mukherjee
T.A. Pai Management Institute Manipal-576104 (Karnataka)
Jitendra Mahakud
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur-721302

Abstract


The objective of the paper is to find out whether the trade-off and pecking order theories are mutually exclusive or complimentary to each other in determining the optimal capital structure of the Indian manufacturing companies during the period 1993-94 to 2007-08. We find that the trade-off and pecking order theories are complimentary to each other to determine the capital structure and therefore, companies' financing behavior is best explained by the modified pecking order theory. We also find that Indian manufacturing companies do have target leverage ratios and the adjustment speed towards the target has been around 40 percent.

Keywords


Trade-off Theory, Modified Pecking Order Theory, Target Leverage Ratio, Adjustment Speed

References