Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Relative Capacity


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Rapid technological advances and pressures of globalization have necessitated not only creation of innovation but faster innovation to gain or sustain competitive advantage. Open innovation paradigm answers this need by utilizing larger resources and expertise that firms involved in the open innovation process offer. The creation of open innovation, among other factors, depends on relative capacity, a firm's ability to retain knowledge outside its boundaries in the inter-firm relations. This conceptual paper first examines relative capacity and proposes its dimensions - realized and potential capacities. Secondly, the relation between relative capacity and creation of open innovation is addressed and how this relation can be affected by different external factors like regimes of appropriability and complementary assets is also discussed. Propositions are developed, managerial implications underscored and future research directions highlighted.

Keywords

Relative Capacity, Open Innovation, Regimes of Appropriability, Complementary Assets
User
Notifications

  • Acha, V. and Cusmano, L. (2005), Governance and Co-ordination of Distributed Innovation Processes: Patterns of RandD Cooperation in the Upstream Petroleum Industry, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(1-2): 1-21.

  • Anton, J. and Yao, D. (2004), Little Patents and Big Secrets: Managing Intellectual Property, The RAND Journal of Economics, 35(1): 1-22.

  • Argote, L. (1999), Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Argote, L., McEvily, B. and Reagans, R. (2003), Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes, Management Science, 49(4): 571-582.

  • Atkins, M. H. (1998), The Role of Appropriability in Sustaining Competitive Advantage: An Electronic Auction System Case Study, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 7(2): 131-152.

  • Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M. J. J. and Chang, C. H. (2009), The Positive Effects of Relationship Learning and Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Performance and Competitive Advantage in Industrial Markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2): 152-158.

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003), The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44.

  • Chesbrough, H. (2005), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press.

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006a), The Era of Open Innovation, in Mayle, D. (Ed), Managing Innovation and Change.

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006b), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business School Press.

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm: Oxford University Press, USA.

  • Dosi, G., Marengo, L. and Pasquali, C. (2006), How Much should Society Fuel the Greed of Innovators?: On the Relations between Appropriability, Opportunities and Rates of Innovation, Research Policy, 35(8): 1110-1121.

  • Garud, R. and Nayyar, P. (1994), Transformative Capacity: Continual Structuring by Intertemporal Technology Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5): 365-385.

  • Gonzalez-Álvarez, N. and Nieto-Antol i n, M. (2007), Appropriability of Innovation Results: An Empirical Study in Spanish Manufacturing Firms, Technovation, 27(5): 280-295.

  • Hagedoorn, J. and Duysters, G. (2002), External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preference for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Management Studies, 39(2): 167-188.

  • Harabi, N. (1995), Appropriability of Technical Innovations an Empirical Analysis, Research Policy, 24(6): 981-992.

  • Hurmelinna, P., Kyläheiko, K. and Jauhiainen, T. (2007), The Janus Face of the Appropriability Regime in the Protection of Innovations: Theoretical Re-appraisal and Empirical Analysis, Technovation, 27(3): 133-144.

  • Ipe, M. (2003), Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework, Human Resource Development Review, 2(4): 337-359.

  • Kafouros, M. I. and Buckley, P. J. (2008), Under what Conditions do Firms Benefit from the Research Efforts of other Organizations? Research Policy, 37(2): 225-239.

  • Kale, P. and Singh, H. (2007), Building Firm Capabilities through Learning: The Role of the Alliance Learning Process in Alliance Capability and Firm-level Alliance Success, Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 981-1000.

  • Kim, L. (1997a), The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors, California Management Review, 39(3): 86-100.

  • Kim, L. (1997b), From Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Lane, P. J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998), Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.

  • Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., Winter, S., Gilbert, R. and Griliches, Z. (1987), Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3): 783-831.

  • Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988), Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1): 319-338.

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2008a), Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1): 148.

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2008b), Relative Capacity: Retaining Knowledge Outside a Firm's Boundaries, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25(3): 200-212.

  • Lichtenthaler, U. and Lichtenthaler, E. (2009), A Capability-based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity, Journal of Management Studies, 46(8).

  • Lopez, L. E. and Roberts, E. B. (2002), First-mover Advantages in Regimes of Weak Appropriability: The Case of Financial Services Innovations, Journal of Business Research, 55(12): 997-1005.

  • Marsh, S. and Stock, G. (2006), Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal Integration, Knowledge Retention and Interpretation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5): 422-436.

  • Mowery, D., Oxley, J. and Silverman, B. (2002), The Two Faces of Partner-specific Absorptive Capacity: Learning and Cospecialization in Strategic Alliances, Cooperative Strategies and Alliances, 292-319.

  • Naqshbandi, M. M. and Kaur, S. (2011), A Study of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours, Organizational Structures and Open Innovation, International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(6): 182-193.

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press.

  • Ordonez de Pablo, P. (2002), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning: Typologies in the Spanish Manufacturing Industry from 1995-1999, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1): 52-62.

  • Popadiuk, S. and Choo, C. (2006), Innovation and Knowledge Creation: How are These Concepts Related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4): 302-312.

  • Rothaermel, F. T. (2001), Complementary Assets, Strategic Alliances and the Incumbent's Advantage: An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry, Research Policy, 30(8): 1235-1251.

  • Scherer, F. and Ross, D. (1992), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston, MA.

  • Selnes, F. and Sallis, J. (2003), Promoting Relationship Learning, Journal of Marketing , 67: 80-95.

  • Szulanski, G. (1996), Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter): 27-43.

  • Teece, D. J. (2000), Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic and Policy Dimensions, Oxford University Press, New York.

  • Teece, D. J. (1986), Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy, Research Policy, 15(6): 285-305.

  • Teece, D. J. (1987), Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration Collaborations, Licensing and Public Policy, in Teece, D. J. (Ed), The Competitive Challenge.

  • Volberda, H. W. (1996), Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments, Organization Science, 7: 359-374.

  • Walsh, J. and Ungson, G. (1991), Organizational Memory, The Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 57-91.

  • Yang, J. T. (2004), Qualitative Knowledge Capturing and Organizational Learning: Two Case Studies in Taiwan Hotels, Tourism Management, 25(4): 421-428.

  • Yeo, R. K. (2005), Learning: The Secret of the Art of War, Management Research News, 28(8).

  • Zahra, S. A. and George, G. (2002), Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization and Extension, The Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.


Abstract Views: 1561

PDF Views: 5




  • Relative Capacity

Abstract Views: 1561  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

Abstract


Rapid technological advances and pressures of globalization have necessitated not only creation of innovation but faster innovation to gain or sustain competitive advantage. Open innovation paradigm answers this need by utilizing larger resources and expertise that firms involved in the open innovation process offer. The creation of open innovation, among other factors, depends on relative capacity, a firm's ability to retain knowledge outside its boundaries in the inter-firm relations. This conceptual paper first examines relative capacity and proposes its dimensions - realized and potential capacities. Secondly, the relation between relative capacity and creation of open innovation is addressed and how this relation can be affected by different external factors like regimes of appropriability and complementary assets is also discussed. Propositions are developed, managerial implications underscored and future research directions highlighted.

Keywords


Relative Capacity, Open Innovation, Regimes of Appropriability, Complementary Assets

References