Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Understanding User Participation and Involvement in Erp Use


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi-110 016.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


User participation and involvement are being studied in the context of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and the research findings based on the data gathered till date are presented in this paper. Given the enterprise-wide scope of these systems and their high level of complexity, in addition to a different implementation methodology, differences in the nature of user participation and involvement were expected. Using Hartwick and Barki's model based on the theory of reasoned action a revised model was developed and tested empirically. While Hartwick and Barki's model explains user behavior vis-à-vis user participation and involvement, a more parsimonious model demonstrates that the usage dynamics in ERP implementation are indeed different. Given the mandatory nature of ERP usage, the subjective norm influencing behavioral intention concerning use may well be extra-organizational.

Keywords

Enterprise Resource Planning, Information System User Behavior
User
Notifications

  • Adams, D.A.; Nelson R.R.; and Todd, P.A. (1992), “Perceived usefulness, and usage of information technology: a replication,” MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247.

  • Bergeron, F.; Rivard, S.; and De Serre, L. (1990), “Investigating the support role of the information center,” MIS Quarterly, 14(3), 247-260.

  • Choe, J. (1998), “The effects of user participation on the design of accounting information systems,” Information & Management, 34(3), 185-198.

  • Davenport, T. H. (1998), “Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system,” Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-131.

  • Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003.

  • Downing, C. E. (1999), “System usage behavior as a proxy for user satisfaction: An empirical investigation,” Information & Management, 35(4), 203-216.

  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison Wesley: Boston, MA.

  • Garrity, E. J. (1994), “User participation, management support and system types,” Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 34-43.

  • Glorfeld, K. D. and Cronan, T. P. (1993), “Computer information satisfaction: A longitudinal study of computing systems and EUC in a public organization,” Journal of End User Computing, 5(1), 27-36.

  • Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994a), “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use,” Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.

  • Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994b), “Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude,” MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 59-82.

  • Hwang, M. I. and Thorn, R. G. (1999), “The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings,” Information & Management, 35(4), 229-236.

  • Jackson, C. M.; Chow, S; and Leitch, R. A. (1997), “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system,” Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357-389.

  • Jenson, R. L. and Johnson, I. R. (1999), “The enterprise resource planning system as a strategic solution,” Information Strategy, 15(4), 28-33.

  • Lu, H and Wang, J. (1997), “The relationships between management styles, user participation, and system success over MIS growth stages,” Information & Management, 32(4), 203-213.

  • McKeen, J. D. and Guimaraes, T. (1997), “Successful strategies for user participation in systems development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(2), 133-150.

  • Montazemi, A. R.; Cameron, D. A.; and Gupta, K. M. (1996), “An empirical study of factors affecting software package selection,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (1), 89-105.

  • Newman, M., and Noble, F. (1990), “User involvement as an interaction process: A case study,” Information Systems Research, 1(1), 89-113.

  • Robey, D. and Farrow, D. (1982), “User involvement in information system development: A conflict model and empirical test,” Management Science, 28(1), 73-85.

  • Tait, P. and Vessey, I. (1988), “The Effect of User Involvement on System Success,” MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 91-108.

  • Tan, B. W. and Lo, T. W. (1990), “Validation of a User Satisfaction Instrument for Office Automation Success,” Information & Management, 18(4), 203-208.

  • Yoon, Y.; Guimaraes, T.; and O Neal, Q. (1995), “Exploring the factors associated with expert systems success,” MIS Quarterly, 19(1), 83-106.

  • Zimbardo, P.G. (1969), “The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos.” In W. Levine, Ed., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1969, 237-307.


Abstract Views: 365

PDF Views: 3




  • Understanding User Participation and Involvement in Erp Use

Abstract Views: 365  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Shivraj Kanungo
Department of Management Studies Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi-110 016.
Shantanu Bagchi
Department of Management Studies Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi-110 016.

Abstract


User participation and involvement are being studied in the context of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and the research findings based on the data gathered till date are presented in this paper. Given the enterprise-wide scope of these systems and their high level of complexity, in addition to a different implementation methodology, differences in the nature of user participation and involvement were expected. Using Hartwick and Barki's model based on the theory of reasoned action a revised model was developed and tested empirically. While Hartwick and Barki's model explains user behavior vis-à-vis user participation and involvement, a more parsimonious model demonstrates that the usage dynamics in ERP implementation are indeed different. Given the mandatory nature of ERP usage, the subjective norm influencing behavioral intention concerning use may well be extra-organizational.

Keywords


Enterprise Resource Planning, Information System User Behavior

References