Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Non-compliance with Accounting Standard for Lease Transactions


Affiliations
1 University of Windsor Odette School of Business Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


It is argued that companies are structuring lease agreements so that leases can be classified as operating thus enhancing their financial results. The International Accounting Standards Board recently proposed that the present classification be removed and all leases would appear on the balance sheet. This paper compares the opinions of 63 qualified accountants in Canada and 54 qualified accountants in Malaysia on the present regulations and the possibility of abuse of present accounting standards. Canadian accountants are more likely to agree than Malaysian accountants that present standards are being abused and there is statistical support that accountants in Malaysia with shorter work experience are more likely to consider that the standard is abused than those with longer work experience. Reasons are suggested for these differences. The paper concludes by identifying potential avenues for further research which would extend our knowledge on the development and implementation of new standards and improve our understanding of the potential relationship between expressed opinions and the personal attributes of the respondents.

Keywords

Accounting for Leases, Regulatory Non-compliance, Accounting for Leases in Malaysia, Accounting for Leases in Canada, Leasing Transactions, Accountants’ Opinions on Leasing Standards
User
Notifications

  • Ashton, R. K. (1985), Accounting for Finance Leases: A Field Test, Accounting and Business Research, 15(59): 233-238.

  • Beattie, V., Goodacre A. and Thomson S. J. (2006), International Lease-Accounting Reform and Economic Consequences: The Views of UK Users and Preparers, The International Journal of Accounting, 41(1): 75-103.

  • Bennett, B., and Bradbury M. (2003), Capitalizing Non-cancellable Operating Leases, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14(2): 101-114.

  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (2007), A Comparison of IFRS and Canadian GAAP, Toronto.

  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (2008), Members Handbook, Toronto.

  • Carlin, T. M., Finch, N. and Laili, N. H. (2009), Goodwill Accounting in Malaysia and the Transition to IFRS – a Comparative Assessment of Large First Year Adopters, Journal of Financial Accounting and Reporting, 7(1): 75-104.

  • Durocher, S. (2008), Canadian Evidence on the Constructive Capitalization of Operating Leases, Accounting Perspectives, 7(3): 227-256.

  • Fleming, M., and Bosco, W. (2006), Lease Accounting: Are Current Rules as Bad as Some Say? Financial Executive, 23(6): 16-17.

  • Frecka, T. (2008), Ethical Issues in Financial Reporting: Is International Structuring of Lease Contracts to Avoid Capitalization Unethical? Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1): 45-59.

  • Hussey, R. and Ong, A. (2006), Taiwanese Regulators’ Perceptions of Accounting Convergence, Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Business, 10(1): 4-17.

  • Imhoff, E., Lipe, R. and Wright D. (1991), Operating Leases: Impact of Constructive Capitalization, Accounting Horizons, 5(1): 51–63.

  • Imhoff, E., Lipe R. and Wright D. (1993), The Effects of Recognition versus Disclosure on Shareholder Risk and Executive Compensation, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 8(4): 335-368.

  • International Accounting Standards Committee (1997), International Accounting Standard 17, Accounting for Leases.

  • International Accounting Standards Board (2009), Leases – Preliminary Views, Discussion Paper DP/2009/1.

  • International Accounting Standards Board (2010), Committee Meeting, March 23.

  • KPMG (2007), IFRS Compared to Canadian GAAP: An Overview, p. 128.

  • McBarnet, D. and Whelan, C. (1991), The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control, Modern Law Review, 54(6): 848-873.

  • McGregor, W. (1996), Accounting for Leases: A New Approach, Financial Accounting Standards Board, Stamford, USA.

  • Malaysian Accounting Standards Board (2009), Comment Letter on Exposure Draft, July 20.


Abstract Views: 395

PDF Views: 5




  • Non-compliance with Accounting Standard for Lease Transactions

Abstract Views: 395  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

Audra Ong
University of Windsor Odette School of Business Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada

Abstract


It is argued that companies are structuring lease agreements so that leases can be classified as operating thus enhancing their financial results. The International Accounting Standards Board recently proposed that the present classification be removed and all leases would appear on the balance sheet. This paper compares the opinions of 63 qualified accountants in Canada and 54 qualified accountants in Malaysia on the present regulations and the possibility of abuse of present accounting standards. Canadian accountants are more likely to agree than Malaysian accountants that present standards are being abused and there is statistical support that accountants in Malaysia with shorter work experience are more likely to consider that the standard is abused than those with longer work experience. Reasons are suggested for these differences. The paper concludes by identifying potential avenues for further research which would extend our knowledge on the development and implementation of new standards and improve our understanding of the potential relationship between expressed opinions and the personal attributes of the respondents.

Keywords


Accounting for Leases, Regulatory Non-compliance, Accounting for Leases in Malaysia, Accounting for Leases in Canada, Leasing Transactions, Accountants’ Opinions on Leasing Standards

References