Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Job Attitudes as Predictor of Employee Turnover among Stayers and Leavers/hoppers


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
2 Gaeddu College of Business Studies Gedu, Bhutan
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study examines the relationship between job attitudes and employee turnover intentions in two categories of employees, labeled as stayers and leavers. The study aims at exploring how job satisfaction and organizational commitment predict employee turnover intention for stayers and leavers. Employees who had changed their jobs two or less than two times in the past four years were defined as stayers while those who had changed jobs two or more than two times in the similar period were considered as leavers/hoppers. Data were collected from 80 managers, selected randomly, from two Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) organizations situated in Delhi (NCR). Results showed that job attitudes were highly related to intention to leave the organization in both categories of employees. Job satisfaction predicted turnover intention in stayers while organizational commitment especially the affective and normative commitment predicted turnover intention better in leavers/hoppers.

Keywords

Job Attitudes, Traditional Wisdom Model, Stayers, Leavers/hoppers
User
Notifications

  • Abelson, M. A. (1993), Turnover Cultures, Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 11: 339-376.

  • Bannister, B. D. and Griffeth, R. W. (1986), Applying a Causal Analytic Framework to the Mobley, Hornerand Hollingsworth (1978) Turnover Model: A Useful Reexamination, Journal of Management, 12: 433-443.

  • Blau, G. and Boal, K. (1989), Using Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment Interactively to Predict Turnover, Journal of Management, 15(1): 115-127.

  • Bluedorn, A. C. (1982), A Unified Model of Turnover from Organizations, Human Relations, 35(2): 135- 153.

  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. and Klesh, J. (1979), The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire, unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Daftuar, C. N. (1988), Job Satisfaction Scale, in D. M. Pestonjee's (1988), Second Handbook of Psychological and Social Instruments, Concept Publishing House, New Delhi.

  • Gautam, T., Dick, R. V., Wagner, U., Upadhay, N and Davis, A. J. ( 2005), Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Organizational Commitment in Nepal, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8: 305-314.

  • Ghiselli, E. E. (1974), Some Perspective for Industrial Psychology, American Psychologist, 29: 80-87.

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W. and Gaertner, S. (2000), A Meta-analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests and Research Implications for the Next Millennium, Journal of Management, 26: 463-488.

  • Griffeth, R. W. and Hom, P. W. (2001), Retaining Valued Employees, Sage, Thousand Oaks.

  • Gupta, P. (2001), Growth Scenario of IT Industries in India, Communications of the ACM, 44(7): 40-41.

  • Harter, J. K. (2008), Why People Change Jobs? Gallup Management Journal, from http://gmj.gallup.com/content/106912/Turning- Around-Your-Turnover-Problem.aspx.

  • Hom P. and Griffeth R. (1991), Structural Equations Modelling Test of a Turnover Theory: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 350-66.

  • Khatri, N., Budhwar, P. and Fern, C. T. (2001), Explaining Employee Turnover in an Asian Context, Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1): 54-74.

  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., McDaniel, L. and Hill, J. W. (1999), Theoretical Development and Extension of the Unfolding Model of Voluntary Turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 42: 450-462.

  • March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958), Organizations, Wiley, New York.

  • Meyer, J. P. and Allen, N. J. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. and Topolnytsky, L. (2002), Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates and Consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61: 20-52.

  • Mitchell, A. (2005), India Maintains Outsourcing Advantage, Ecommerce Times, May 3, 2005, from http://crmbuyer.com/ story/42781.html.

  • Mitchell, A. (2007), Pakistan Now a Hot Spot for IT Outsourcing, Medialinkers, from http://www.medialinkers.com/itoutsourcingpakistan.html.

  • Mobley, W. H. (1977), Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62: 238.

  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H. and Meglino, B. M. (1979), Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process, Psychological Bulletin, 86(3): 493-522.

  • Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O. and Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978), An Evaluation of Precursors of Hospital Employee Turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4): 408-414.

  • Mobley, W. H. (1982), Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control, Adisson-Wesley, Reading, MA.

  • Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday R. T. and Boulian, P. V. (1974), Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 603-609.

  • Rossano, E. (1985), Factors Associated with the Turnover Intentions of Ohio Cooperative Extension County Agents, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

  • Shahnawaz, M. G. and Jaffri, M. H. (2009), Exploring Antecedents of Employees Turnover in India, Abhigyan, 26: 25-40.

  • Times News, New York (2003), Attrition in Indian BPO Industry. Downloaded on July 15, 2008, from http://www.bpoindia.org/research/attrition.shtml.

  • Wagner, C. M. (2007), Organizational Commitment as a Predictor Variable in Nursing Turnover Research: Literature Review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3): 235-247.

  • Wong, C. S., Chun, H. and Law, K. S. (1996), Casual Relationship between Attitudinal Antecedents to Turnover, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings 1995, pp. 342-346, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada.

  • Zimmerman, R. D. (2008), Understanding The Impact Of Personality Traits On Individuals' Turnover Decisions: A Meta-Analytic Path Model, Personnel Psychology, 61(2): 309-348.


Abstract Views: 603

PDF Views: 1




  • Job Attitudes as Predictor of Employee Turnover among Stayers and Leavers/hoppers

Abstract Views: 603  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

M. G. Shahnawaz
Department of Psychology Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Md. Hassan Jafri
Gaeddu College of Business Studies Gedu, Bhutan

Abstract


The present study examines the relationship between job attitudes and employee turnover intentions in two categories of employees, labeled as stayers and leavers. The study aims at exploring how job satisfaction and organizational commitment predict employee turnover intention for stayers and leavers. Employees who had changed their jobs two or less than two times in the past four years were defined as stayers while those who had changed jobs two or more than two times in the similar period were considered as leavers/hoppers. Data were collected from 80 managers, selected randomly, from two Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) organizations situated in Delhi (NCR). Results showed that job attitudes were highly related to intention to leave the organization in both categories of employees. Job satisfaction predicted turnover intention in stayers while organizational commitment especially the affective and normative commitment predicted turnover intention better in leavers/hoppers.

Keywords


Job Attitudes, Traditional Wisdom Model, Stayers, Leavers/hoppers

References