Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Identification of Role of Social Audit by Stakeholders as Accountability Tool in Good Governance


Affiliations
1 Member Secretary Delhi Pollution Control Committee Govt. of Delhi, ISBT Building Kashmere Gate, Delhi- 110006
2 University School of Management Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Delhi-110006
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the recent years social audit is being viewed as a promising approach to improve the performance and social accountability in private as well as in public sector. A number of state governments have also initiated social audit exercise and government of Delhi is probably the pioneer in social audit. Organizations have developed procedures, standards and methods to achieve social audit as it has been useful in many ways in improving performance and accountability, but it is only the stakeholders who can truly appreciate the benefits and role of social audit. This study undertakes the construction of a standardized Likert scale questionnaire to assess the role of social audit as perceived by stakeholders. In the process of constructing the instrument, this paper attempts to clarify the actual role of the society and civic engagements as is perceived and expected by stakeholders. Social audit creates confidence in society regarding government initiatives, promotes transparency and efficiency, improves social, ethical and environmental performance, enhances inclusion, facilitates monitoring and ensures accountability.

Keywords

Social Audit, Accountability, Good Governance, Stakeholders
User
Notifications

  • ADB-Promoting Good Governance (2000), ADB's Medium Level Agenda and Action Plan (2000); III Implementation of ADB's Governance policy.; www. adb.org/documents/polices/goodgovernance

  • Bell, S. and Morse, S. (2003), Measuring Sustainability: Learning from Doing, Earthscan, pp17, London.

  • Boyd Graham (2005), Social Auditing - A Method Of Determining Impact (www.calendoria.org.uk/socialland/social.html).

  • Gore, Al Jr. (1994), The New Job of the Federal Executive, Public Administration Review, 54(4): 317-21

  • Gray Oven and Adams (1996), Accounting and Accountability Changes and Challenges in Corporate, Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice Hall, UK.

  • Jain S. P. and Wim Polman (2003), A Handbook for Trainers on Participatory Local Development, RAP Publication 2003/2007. FAO, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Kessler W. B., Salwasser H., Cartwright, C. W. Jr. and Caplan J. A. (1992), New Perspectives for Sustainable Natural Resource Management, Ecological Applications, 2(3): 221-225.

  • Kumar, Praveen (2002), An Analytical Study of the Philosophy and Field Dynamics of the Policing in Practice: Requisites of Good Governance, www.kumar50.blogspot.com.

  • Liberatore, Angela (2004), Governance and Democracy: Reflections on the European Debate in Good Governance, in Surendera Munshi and Biju P Abraham (Eds), Democratic Societies and Globalization. Sage Publications, New Delhi.

  • Meppem, T. and Gill, R. (1998), Planning for Sustainability as a Learning Concept, Ecological Economics, 26: 121-137.

  • Nayyar, Dhiraj (2000), Alleviating Poverty, Role of Good Governance and Constitutional Reform, Economic & Political Weekly, October 14-20, 2000.

  • Parthasarthy, M. (1988), Social Audit and its Relevance to Public Utilities, Asian Journal of Government Audit. Comptroller and Auditor General of India, New Delhi.

  • Public Affairs Foundation (2006), Social Audit Of Public Services in Delhi. Public Affairs Foundation, Bangalore, India. Roy, Aruna, Dey, Nikhil and Singh, Shankar (2001), Demanding Accountaility Seminar, April 2001.

  • Sorabjee, Soli J. (2001), Why Transparency and Accountability Matter: Good Governance in a Democracy, Report of Inaugural conference of the Asian Centre for Democratic Governance, New Delhi, www.ned.org/acdg/inaugural/session/html.


Abstract Views: 464

PDF Views: 1




  • Identification of Role of Social Audit by Stakeholders as Accountability Tool in Good Governance

Abstract Views: 464  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

S. S. Ghonkrokta
Member Secretary Delhi Pollution Control Committee Govt. of Delhi, ISBT Building Kashmere Gate, Delhi- 110006
Anu Singh Lather
University School of Management Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Delhi-110006

Abstract


In the recent years social audit is being viewed as a promising approach to improve the performance and social accountability in private as well as in public sector. A number of state governments have also initiated social audit exercise and government of Delhi is probably the pioneer in social audit. Organizations have developed procedures, standards and methods to achieve social audit as it has been useful in many ways in improving performance and accountability, but it is only the stakeholders who can truly appreciate the benefits and role of social audit. This study undertakes the construction of a standardized Likert scale questionnaire to assess the role of social audit as perceived by stakeholders. In the process of constructing the instrument, this paper attempts to clarify the actual role of the society and civic engagements as is perceived and expected by stakeholders. Social audit creates confidence in society regarding government initiatives, promotes transparency and efficiency, improves social, ethical and environmental performance, enhances inclusion, facilitates monitoring and ensures accountability.

Keywords


Social Audit, Accountability, Good Governance, Stakeholders

References