Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Firm Performance and the Axis of Errors


Affiliations
1 Dean of Research Said Business School Oxford University Fellow in Economics and Management St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, United Kingdom
2 EDHEC Business School, Nice, France
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Firms sometimes fail to capture opportunities, fail to imitate perfectly-imitable resources, and do not solve their solvable problems. The persistence of errors creates intra-industry performance variation that is usually attributed to the competitive advantages of successful firms. However, firms compete on two axes: the axis of competitive advantage, where performance is driven by the inimitable resources and capabilities of high-performing firms; and the axis of errors, where performance is driven by failures to attend to the activities, resources and opportunities that are equally available to all firms. This paper investigates the latter, showing how errors produce performance variation not attributable to competitive advantages, and discussing their consequences for strategy theory, empirical research and management practice.

Keywords

Competitive Advantage, Organizational Errors, Competitive Disadvantage
User
Notifications

  • Abrahamson, E. and Park, C. (1994), Concealment of Negative Organizational Outcomes: An Agency Theory Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1302-1335.

  • Ahuja, G., Coff, R. W. and Lee, P. M. (2005), Managerial Foresight and Attempted Rent Appropriation: Insider Trading on Knowledge of Imminent Breakthroughs, Strategic Management Journal, 26: 791-808.

  • Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K. and Schmidt, P. (1977), Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, Journal of Econometrics, 6: 21-37.

  • Andrews, K. (1965), The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Irwin, Homewood.

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965), Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Arend, R. J. (2003), Revisiting the Logical and Research Considerations of Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 279-284.

  • Arend, R. J. (2004), The Definition of Strategic Liabilities, and their Impact on Firm Performance, Journal of Management Studies, 41: 1003-1027.

  • Barney, J. B. (1986), Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy, Management Science, 32: 1231-1241.

  • Barney, J. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.

  • Barrett, F. J. (1998), Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning, Organization Science, 9(5): 605-622.

  • Bergsman, J. (1974), Commercial Policy, Allocative Efficiency, and X-efficiency, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88: 409-433.

  • Blyler, M. B. and Coff, R. W. (2003), Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 677-686.

  • Bradley, G. W. (1978), Self-serving Biases in the Attribution Process: A Reexamination of the Fact and Fiction Question, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36: 56-71.

  • Button, K. J. (1985), Potential Differences in X-inefficiency between Industrial Sectors in the United Kingdom, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 25: 85-95.

  • Button, K. J. and Weyman-Jones, T. G. (1992), Ownership Structure, Institutional Organization, and Measured X-efficiency, American Economic Review, 82: 439-445.

  • Caves, R. E. and Barton, D. R. (1990), Efficiency in U. S. Manufacturing Industries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Caves R. E. and Porter M. E. (1977), From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2): 241-262

  • Coff, R. W. (1999), When Competitive Advantage Doesnt Lead to Performance: The Resource-based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power, Organization Science, 10: 119-213.

  • Cubbin, J. and Geroski, P. (1987), The Convergence of Profits in the Long Run: Inter-firm and Inter-industry Comparisons, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 427-442.

  • DAveni, R. A. (1994), Hypercompetition. Free Press, New York.

  • Denrell, J. (2004), Random Walks and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Management Science, 50: 922-934.

  • Denrell, J. (2003), Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management, Organization Science, 14(3): 227- 243.

  • Dierickx, I. and Cool K. (1989), Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage, Management Science, 35: 1504-1511.

  • Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, R. S. (1994), Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

  • Durand, R. (2002), Competitive Advantages Exist: A Critique of Powell. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 867-872.

  • Fama, E. and French K. R.. (2000), Forecasting Profitability and Earnings, The Journal of Business, 73: 161-176.

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part III, 120: 253- 281.

  • Finkelstein, S. (2003), Why Smart Executives Fail. Penguin Books, New York.

  • Folkes, V. S. (1988), Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behaviour: A Review and New Directions, Journal of Consumer Research, 14: 548-565.

  • Frantz, R. (1988), X-efficiency: Theory, Evidence and Applications. Kluwer, Boston.

  • Frantz, R. (1992), X-efficiency and Allocative Efficiency: What have We Learned? American Economic Review, 82: 434-438.

  • Friedman, M. (1953), Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Ghemawat, P. (1991), Commitment. The Free Press, New York.

  • Ghemawat, P. (2002), Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective, Business History Review, Spring: 37-74.

  • Gimeno, J. Folta, T., Cooper, A. and Woo, C. (1997), Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 750-783.

  • Goddard, J. and Wilson J. (1999), The Persistence of Profit: A New Empirical Interpretation, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17: 663-687.

  • Grant, R. and Spender, J. C. (1996), Knowledge and the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 5-10.

  • Hayes, R. H. and Upton, D. M. (1998), Operations-based Strategy, California Management Review, 40(4): 8-25.

  • Henderson, B. (1970), Perspectives on Experience. Boston Consulting Group Publishing, Boston.

  • Jacobides, M. (2006), New Frontiers in Competition and Industry Structure, paper presented at McKinsey Global Practice Conference, Berlin.

  • Jacobsen, R. (1988), The Persistence of Abnormal Returns, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 415-430.

  • Jameson, K. (1972), Comment of the Theory and Measurement of Dynamic X-efficiency, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86: 313- 326.

  • Johnston, J. (1963), The Productivity of Management Consultants, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 237-249.

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984), Choices, Values and Frames, American Psychologist, 39: 341-350.

  • Kamien, M. and Schwartz, N. (1981), Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. North-Holland, New York.

  • Koopmans, T. (1951), Efficient Allocation of Resources, Econometrica, 19: 455-465.

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (1988), Estimation of Input-specific Technical and Allocative Inefficiency in Stochastic Frontier Models, Oxford Economic Papers, 40: 535-549.

  • Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R. and Guth, W. D. (1965), Business Policy: Text and Cases. Irwin, Homewood. Leibenstein, H. (1966), Allocative Efficiency vs. X-efficiency, American Economic Review, 56: 392-415.

  • Leibenstein, H. (1976), Beyond Economic Man. Harvard Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Leibenstein, H. and Maital, S. (1992), Empirical Estimation and Partitioning of X-inefficiency: A Data-envelopment Approach, American Economic Review, 82: 428-433.

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125.

  • Levinthal, D. L. (1991), Random Walks and Organizational Mortality, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 397-420.

  • Levinthal, D. L. (2006), Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning, Organizational Science, 17: 502-513.

  • Lippman, S. A. and Rumelt, R. P. (2003), The Bargaining Perspective on Resource Analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1069- 1086.

  • Lowenstein, R. (2000), When Genius Failed. Random House, New York.

  • March, J. G. (2006), Rationality, Foolishness, and Adaptive Intelligence, Strategic Management Journal, 27: 201-214.

  • McGahan, A. (1999), The Performance of US Corporations: 1981-1994, Journal of Industrial Economics, 47: 373-395.

  • McGahan, A. and Porter, M. E. (1997), How Much Does Industry Matter, Really?, Strategic Management Journal, 18: 5-14.

  • Meeusen, W. and Van den Broeck, J. (1977), Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error, International Economic Review, 18: 435-444.

  • Miller, D. (1992), The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall. Harper Collins, New York.

  • Miller, D. (1993), The Architecture of Simplicity, The Academy of Management Review, 18: 116-139.

  • Miller, D. and Shamsie, J. (1996), The Resource-based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios from 1936 to 1965, Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 519-543.

  • Miller, D. T. and Ross, M. (1975), Self Serving Biases in Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction, Psychological Bulletin, 82: 213-225

  • Montgomery, C. A. (1995), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of The Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Kluwer, Boston. Mueller, D. (1986), Profits in the Long-Run. Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Ocasio, W. (1997), Towards an Attention-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187-206.

  • Peristiani, S. (1997), Do Mergers Improve the X-efficiency and Scale Efficiency of US Banks? Evidence from the 1980s, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29: 326-337.

  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993), The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179- 191.

  • Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I. (1999), Knowing What to Do is not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Actions, California Management Review, 42(1): 83-108.

  • Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I. (2000), The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

  • Postrel, S. and Rumelt, R. P. (1992), Incentives, Routines and Self-command, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(3): 397-425.

  • Powell, T. C. (2001), Competitive Advantage: Logical and Philosophical Considerations, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 873-880.

  • Powell, T. C. (2002), The Philosophy of Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 873-880.

  • Powell, T. C. (2003), Varieties of Competitive Parity, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 61-86.

  • Powell, T. C. (2004), Strategy, Execution and Idle Rationality, Journal of Management Research, 4(2): 77-98.

  • Powell, T. C. and Lloyd, C. (2005), Toward a General Theory of Competitive Dominance: Comments and Extensions on Powell (2003), Strategic Management Journal, 26: 385-395.

  • Priem, R. L. and Butler, J. E. (2001), Is the Resource-based View a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Academy of Management Review, 28: 22-40.

  • Primeaux, W. J. (1977), An Assessment of X-efficiency Gained through Competition, Review of Economics and Statistics, 59: 105- 108.

  • Probst, G. and Raisch, S. (2005), Organizational Crisis: The Logic of Failure, Academy of Management Executive, 19: 90-105.

  • Ray, G., Barney, J. B. and Muhanna, W. A. (2004), Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resources-based View, Strategic Management Journal, 25: 23-37.

  • Ross, S. (1973), The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principals Problem, American Economic Review, 63: 134-139.

  • Rumelt, R. P. (1984), Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, in R. B. Lamb (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, pp. 556-570. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Rumelt, R. P. (1991), How Much Does Industry Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3): 167-185.

  • Rumelt, R. P, Schendel, D. E. and Teece, D. J. (eds.) (1994), Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Harvard University Press, Boston.

  • Salter, W. E. (1960), Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Schendel, D. E. and Hofer, C. W. (eds). (1979), Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning. Little Brown & Co., Boston.

  • Schmalansee, R. (1985), Do Markets Differ Much? American Economic Review, 75: 341-351.

  • Shelton, J. P. (1967), Allocative Efficiency vs. X-efficiency Comment, American Economic Review, 57: 1252-1258.

  • Shen, T. Y. (1973), Technology Diffusion, Substitution and X-efficiency, Econometrica, 41: 263-284.

  • Simon, H. A. (1993), Strategy and Organizational Evolution, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 131-142.

  • Sull, D. N. (2003), Revival of the Fittest: Why Good Companies Go Bad and How Great Managers Remake Them. Harvard Press, Cambridge.

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533.

  • Tripsas, M. and Gavetti, G. (2000), Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1147-1161.

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (2006), Behavioral Assumptions and Theory Development: The Case of Transaction Cost Economics, Strategic Management Journal, 27: 999-1011.

  • Vermeulen, F. (2006), How Bad Practice Prevails: A Model of the Diffusion and Persistence of Detrimental Management Practice, paper presented at the Strategic Management Society Conference, Vienna.

  • Waring, G. (1996), Industry Differences in the Persistence of Firm-specific Returns, American Economic Review, 86: 1253-1264.

  • Weitzel, W. and Johnson, E. (1989), Decline in Organizations: A Literature Integration and Extension, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 91-109.

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984), A Resource-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(1): 171-180.

  • West, G. P. and DeCastro J. (2001), The Achilles Heel of Firm Strategy: Resource Weaknesses and Distinctive Inadequacies, The Journal of Management Studies, 38: 417-442.

  • Wiggins, R. R. and Ruefli, T. W. (2002), Sustained Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance, Organization Science, 13: 82-105.

  • Wiggins, R. R and Reufli, T. W. (2005), Schumpeters Shost: Is Hypercompetition Making the Best of Times Shorter?, Strategic Management Journal, 26: 887-911.

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991), Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 75-94. Womack, J. P. and Jones, D. T. (2003), Lean Thinking. Simon & Schuster, London.


Abstract Views: 342

PDF Views: 1




  • Firm Performance and the Axis of Errors

Abstract Views: 342  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Thomas C. Powell
Dean of Research Said Business School Oxford University Fellow in Economics and Management St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, United Kingdom
Jean-Luc Arregle
EDHEC Business School, Nice, France

Abstract


Firms sometimes fail to capture opportunities, fail to imitate perfectly-imitable resources, and do not solve their solvable problems. The persistence of errors creates intra-industry performance variation that is usually attributed to the competitive advantages of successful firms. However, firms compete on two axes: the axis of competitive advantage, where performance is driven by the inimitable resources and capabilities of high-performing firms; and the axis of errors, where performance is driven by failures to attend to the activities, resources and opportunities that are equally available to all firms. This paper investigates the latter, showing how errors produce performance variation not attributable to competitive advantages, and discussing their consequences for strategy theory, empirical research and management practice.

Keywords


Competitive Advantage, Organizational Errors, Competitive Disadvantage

References