Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

FDI and the EU


Affiliations
1 College of Business Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this study, perceptual mapping was used to identify the collective and individual positions of the ten largest EU member nations. The perceived position of the "ideal" nation also was captured by the study's findings. FDI executives who were surveyed indicated that some EU nations (i.e., France, Germany, and the United Kingdom) have positioned themselves strategically in terms of their business environments, market potential, and availability of resources. Other nations possess strengths in individual areas, while still others face significant FDI obstacles in multiple areas.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment, Eu, Economic Development
User
Notifications

  • Bureau of the Census (1996), Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1995, p. 856, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 1996,

  • De Jonquieres, G. (1995), Rocky Road to Liberalization, Financial Times, April 10: 15.

  • Dichtl, E. and H. G. Koglmayr (1986), Nation Risk Ratings, Management International Review 26 (4): 6.

  • Erb, Claude B., Campbell R. Harvey, and Tadas E, Viskanta (1996), Expected Returns and Volatility in 135 Countries, Journal of Portfolio Management 22 (Spring): 46.

  • Green, Paul E. (1975), Marketing Applications of MDS: Assessment and Outlook, Journal of Marketing 39 (January): 24-31.

  • Hill, Charles W. (1997), International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace, p. 179, Richard D. Irwin Publishers, Chicago, IL.

  • Jenkins, Gareth (1995), Investment Funds in Cuba: An Upcoming Caribbean Tiger, Columbia Journal of World Business 30(Spring): 42.

  • Kotabe, Masaaki and Kristiaan Helsen (1998), Global Marketing Management, p. 127, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY.

  • Krugman, Paul (1994), Does Third World Growth Hurt First World Prosperity, Harvard Business Review 72 (July-August): 113-121.

  • International Development Research Council, IDRC 1998-1999 International Membership and Resource Directory.

  • Ries, Al and Jack Trout (1981), Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

  • Scanlon, Jay R. (1994), Site Selection and Design for the Growth Industries, Industrial Development (March/April): 26-29.

  • The World Factbook, 1997.

  • World Development Indicators 1997, The World Bank.

  • World Economy Survey (1992), The Economist September: 17.

  • www.eurunion.org/profile/facts.htm


Abstract Views: 394

PDF Views: 1




  • FDI and the EU

Abstract Views: 394  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Troy A Festervand
College of Business Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132

Abstract


In this study, perceptual mapping was used to identify the collective and individual positions of the ten largest EU member nations. The perceived position of the "ideal" nation also was captured by the study's findings. FDI executives who were surveyed indicated that some EU nations (i.e., France, Germany, and the United Kingdom) have positioned themselves strategically in terms of their business environments, market potential, and availability of resources. Other nations possess strengths in individual areas, while still others face significant FDI obstacles in multiple areas.

Keywords


Foreign Direct Investment, Eu, Economic Development

References