Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Examining Gender Differences in Performance Evaluations, Rewards and Punishments


Affiliations
1 Director of Graduate Programs University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, AL 35801
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


With the increasing number of women holding professional positions in the workforce, there have been a number of studies examining gender differences within the organization. This study updates the understanding of the female working professionals by examining whether gender affects the manner in which a person is evaluated, rewarded, and/or punished by his/her supervisor. Hypotheses are developed from a cross-disciplinary literature including accounting, management, marketing, and psychology. Results showing fewer gender differences than expected bring into question anecdotal suggestions that females continue to require special programs to facilitate their assimilation into the workforce. Specific recommendations are provided regarding individual treatment for both male and female employees.

Keywords

Gender Differences, Performance Evaluation, Employee Rewards, Employee Punishments
User
Notifications

  • Alter, L (1991), Retaining Women CPAs, Journal of Accountancy 25(May): 50-55.

  • Bartol, Kathryn and Anthony Butterfield (1976), Sex Effects in Evaluating Leaders, Journal of Applied Psychology 61(August): 446- 454.

  • Bellizzi, Joseph A. and Robert E. Hite (1989), Supervising Unethical Salesforce Behavior, Journal of Marketing 53 (April): 36-47.

  • Brief, Arthur P. and Ramon J. Aldag (1975), Male-Female Differences in Occupational Attitudes within Minority Groups, Journal of Vocational Behavior 6 (June): 305-314.

  • Bruning, Nealia S. and Robert A. Snyder (1983), Sex and Position as Predictors of Organizational Commitment, Academy of Management Journal 26 (September): 485-491.

  • Busch, Paul and Ronald F. Bush (1978), Women Contrasted to Men in the Industrial Salesforce: Job Satisfaction, Values, Role Clarity, Performance, and Propensity to Leave, Journal of Marketing Research 15 (August): 438-448.

  • Deaux, Kay (1979), Self-evaluation of Male and Female Managers, Sex Roles 5 (October): 571-580.

  • Dweck, Carol S., William Davidson, Sharon Nelson, and Bradley Enna (1978), Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: II. The Contingencies of Evaluative Feedback in the Classroom: An Experimental Analysis, Developmental Psychology, 14 (May): 268- 76.

  • Fogarty, Timothy J., Larry M Parker, and Thomas Robinson (1998), Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Performance Evaluation and Gender in Large Public Accounting Organizations, Women in Management Review 13(8): 299.

  • Fugate, Douglas L., Phillip J. Decker, and Joyce J. Brewer (1988), Women in Professional Selling: A Human Resource Management Perspective, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 8 (November): 33-41.

  • Gable, Myron and B. J. Reed (1987), The Current Status of Women in Professional Selling, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 7 (May): 33-39.

  • Giddens, A (1987), Social Theory and Modern Sociology, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CT.

  • Hackett, G and N Betz (1981), A Self-Efficacy Approach to the Career Development of Women, Journal of Vocational Behavior 18: 326-339.

  • Hodson, Randy (1989), Gender Differences in Job Satisfaction: Why Arent Women More Dissatisfied?, The Sociological Quarterly 30 (July): 385-399.

  • Johnson, E, D Lowe, and P Reckers (1996), He Said, She Said: Gender and Explanatory Effects on Peer Evaluations of Audit Peformance, paper presented at the American Accounting Association.

  • Kohli, Ajay K. (1985), Some Unexplored Supervisory Behaviors and Their Influence on Salespeoples Role Clarity, Specific Self- Esteem, Job Satisfaction, and Motivation, Journal of Marketing Research 22 (November): 424-33.

  • Landy, Frank S. and James L. Farr (1980), Performance Rating, Psychological Bulletin 87 (January): 72-107.

  • Lenney, Ellen (1977), Womens Self-Confidence in Achievement Settings, Psychological Bulletin 84 (January): 1-13.

  • Maccoby, Eleanor E. and Carol Jacklin (1974), The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

  • Mobley, W. H. (1982), Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control. Reading, Addison-Wesley, MASS.

  • Nieva, Veronica F. and Barbara A. Gutek (1980), Sex Effects on Evaluation, Academy of Management Review 5 (April): 267-276.

  • OLeary, Virginia E. (1974), Some Additional Barriers to Occupational Aspirations in Women, Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (November): 809-826.

  • Podaskoff, P. M., W. D. Todor, R. A. Grover, and V. L. Huber (1984), Situational Moderators of Leader Reward and Punishment Behaviors: Fact or Fiction?, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 34: 21-63.

  • Ritchie, J (1996), Gender Differences in Performance Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 797-99.

  • Rosen, Benson and Thomas H. Jerdee (1973), The Influence of Sex-Role Stereotypes on Evaluations of Male and Female Supervisory Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (February): 44-48.

  • Rosenthal, Patrice (1995), Gender Differences in Managers Attributions for Successful Work Performance, Women in Management Review 10(6): 26-32.

  • , David Guest, and Riccardo Peccei (1996), Gender Differences in Managers Causal Explanations for Their Work Performance: A Study of Two Organizations, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 69 (June): 145-152.

  • Rozema, Hazel J. and John W. Gray (1987), How Wide Is Your Communication Gender Gap?, Personnel Journal 66 (July): 98-105.

  • Schul, Patrick L. and Brent M Wren (1992), The Emerging Role of Women in Industrial Selling: A Decade of Change, Journal of Marketing 56 (July): 38-54.

  • , Steven Remington, and Robert L. Berl (1990), Assessing Gender Differences in Relationships Between Supervisory Behaviors and Job-Related Outcomes in the Industrial Sales Force, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 10 (Summer): 1-16.

  • Shore, Lynn McFarlane and George C. Thornton, III (1986), Effects of Gender on Self- and Supervisory Ratings, Academy of Management Journal 29 (March): 115-129.

  • Swan, John E., Charles M. Futrell, and John T. Todd (1978), Same Job Different Views: Women and Men in Industrial Sales, Journal of Marketing 42 (January): 92-98.

  • Taynor, Janet and Kathryn Deaux (1973), When Women Are More Deserving Than Men: Equity, Attribution, and Perceived Sex Difference, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28 (December): 360-367.

  • Terborg, James R. and Daniel R. Ilgen (1975), A Theoretical Approach to Sex Discrimination in Traditionally Masculine Occupations, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13 (June): 353-76.

  • Thornton, George C., III (1980), Psychometric Properties of Self-Appraisals of Job Performance, Personnel Psychology 33 (Summer): 263-271.

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1970, 2000), Employment and Earnings, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Van Overwalle, F and M De Metseneare (1990), The Effects of Atribution-Based Intervention and Study Strategy Training on Academic Achievement in College Freshmen, British Journal of Educational Psychology 60: 299-311.


Abstract Views: 477

PDF Views: 1




  • Examining Gender Differences in Performance Evaluations, Rewards and Punishments

Abstract Views: 477  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Brent M Wren
Director of Graduate Programs University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, AL 35801

Abstract


With the increasing number of women holding professional positions in the workforce, there have been a number of studies examining gender differences within the organization. This study updates the understanding of the female working professionals by examining whether gender affects the manner in which a person is evaluated, rewarded, and/or punished by his/her supervisor. Hypotheses are developed from a cross-disciplinary literature including accounting, management, marketing, and psychology. Results showing fewer gender differences than expected bring into question anecdotal suggestions that females continue to require special programs to facilitate their assimilation into the workforce. Specific recommendations are provided regarding individual treatment for both male and female employees.

Keywords


Gender Differences, Performance Evaluation, Employee Rewards, Employee Punishments

References