Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Managing Flexibility in Manufacturing and Operations


Affiliations
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi 110042
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The objective of this paper is to present the results and critical analysis of a case study conducted on Rail Coach Factory (RCF) Kapurthala, which is one of the largest engineering companies in India in the Government sector, engaged in manufacturing coaches for the railways. The electronics-enabled revolution has brought about rapid changes in not only the corporate and business world, but has also resulted in changing the social and cultural patterns globally. The manufacturing industry is no exception and has seen much advancement in manufacturing technology during the last few decades. The advent of Flexible Manufacturing Technology (FMT) is one such revolution. Although the diffusion of FMT is fairly substantial in Japan and other developed nations, especially in the USA, U.K., Germany, Sweden, Italy, and France; in India, the technology is in the nascent stage of take off. This study is a part of an exhaustive survey covering aspects related to the current and likely future state of adoption and operation of FMT in the Indian context. Various aspects covered in this study include the company profile, its FMT environment, the strategic factors contributing to the choice of FMT equipment, impacts of FMT on the technical and organizational systems of the company, and so on. A Situation-Actor-Process (SAP) analysis is carried out leading to the identification of learning issues and conclusions.

Keywords

Flexible Manufacturing Technology, Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Computerization, Automation, Production, Organization
User
Notifications

  • Benjaafar, Saifallah and Gupta, Diwakar (1998), Scope Versus Focus: Issues of Flexibility, Capacity and Number of Production Flexibilities, IIE Transactions 30(5): 413-425.

  • Carlson, B.(1992), Management of Flexible Manufacturing : An International Comparison, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science 20(1): 11-22.

  • De Meyer, A., Nakane, J., Miller, J. and Ferdows, K. (1989), Flexibility: The Next Competitive Battle, The Manufacturing Future Survey, Strategic Management Journal 10: 135-144.

  • Dixon, J.R. (1992), Measuring Manufacturing Flexibility: An Empirical Investigation, European Journal of Operational Research 60(2): 131-143.

  • Hartley, J. (1984), Flexible Automation in Japan, IFS, pp. 191-216, Springer Verlag.

  • Hayes, R.H. and Jaikumar, R., (1988), Manufacturing’s Crisis: New Technologies, Obsolete Organizations, Harvard Business Review 66: 77-85.

  • Hill, Malcolm, R. (1985), FMS Management – The Scope for Further Research, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 5(3): 05-20.

  • Margirier, Gilles, (1986), Flexible Automated Machining in France: Results of a Survey, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 6(4): 253-265.

  • Meade, L.M. and Sarkis, J. (1999), Analyzing Organizational Projects Alternatives for Agile Manufacturing Processes: An Analytical Network Approach, International Journal of Production Research 17(2): 241-261.

  • Miller, J.G., Amano, A., Demeyer, A., Ferdows, K., Roth, A. and Nakane, J. (1989), Closing the Competitive Gaps: The International Report of the Manufacturing Future Project, Boston University Manufacturing Roundtable Research Report Series.

  • Ranta, J. and Tchijov, I.(1990), Economics and Success Factors of FMS: The Conventional Explanation Revisited, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 2(2): 169-190.

  • Roller, L.H. and Tombak (1991), Strategic Aspects of Flexible Production Technologies: Theory and Evidence, International Journal of Production Economics 23: 197-204.

  • Shani (Rami), A.B., Grant, Robert. M., Krishnan, R., Thompson, Frick (1992), Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Organizational Choice: Sociotechnical Systems Approach, California Management Review 66(4): 91-111.

  • Sharma, O.P. and Sharma, P.B. (1997), Global Versus the Indian Industry’s Competitive Edge with Flexible Manufacturing Technology, Proceedings of the Portalnd International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET July 27-31: 693-696, Portland, USA.

  • Sushil (1997), Flexible Systems Management: An Evolving Paradigm, Systems Research and Behavioral Science 14(4) 259-275.

  • Sushil (2000), Concept of Sytemic Felxibility, Golbal Journal of Felxible Systems Management 1(1): 77-80.

  • Upton, D.M., (1995), What Really makes Factories Flexible?, Harvard Business Review July-August: 74-84.

  • Willenborg, J.A.M and Krabbendam, J.J. (1987), Industrial Automation Requires Organizational Adaptations, Conference Paper, International Journal of Production Research 25(11): 1683-1691.


Abstract Views: 327

PDF Views: 1




  • Managing Flexibility in Manufacturing and Operations

Abstract Views: 327  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

O P Sharma
Department of Mechanical Engineering Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi 110042

Abstract


The objective of this paper is to present the results and critical analysis of a case study conducted on Rail Coach Factory (RCF) Kapurthala, which is one of the largest engineering companies in India in the Government sector, engaged in manufacturing coaches for the railways. The electronics-enabled revolution has brought about rapid changes in not only the corporate and business world, but has also resulted in changing the social and cultural patterns globally. The manufacturing industry is no exception and has seen much advancement in manufacturing technology during the last few decades. The advent of Flexible Manufacturing Technology (FMT) is one such revolution. Although the diffusion of FMT is fairly substantial in Japan and other developed nations, especially in the USA, U.K., Germany, Sweden, Italy, and France; in India, the technology is in the nascent stage of take off. This study is a part of an exhaustive survey covering aspects related to the current and likely future state of adoption and operation of FMT in the Indian context. Various aspects covered in this study include the company profile, its FMT environment, the strategic factors contributing to the choice of FMT equipment, impacts of FMT on the technical and organizational systems of the company, and so on. A Situation-Actor-Process (SAP) analysis is carried out leading to the identification of learning issues and conclusions.

Keywords


Flexible Manufacturing Technology, Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Computerization, Automation, Production, Organization

References