Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Intrapreneurial Programs in fortune 500 Firms


Affiliations
1 Employee Development, Relations, and Assistance Programs, Clemson University Perimeter Road, Clemson South Carolina 29634–5337
2 School of Business Saint Leo University Saint Leo, FL 33574
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The global impact of intrapreneurship has become more evident in major corporations both nationally and internationally and while much research effort has focused on the entrepreneur, the concept of taking the idea into the corporate arena requires not only differing terminology, but also a completely different set of standards (Sarbough-Thompson, 1998; Macmillian, 1986). Eight years ago the researchers investigated the impact of intrapreneurship and related programs within Fortune 500 corporations. The purpose of this study is to provide a longitudinal investigation as to the continued impact of intrapreneurial activity within the specified corporations. This research initiative includes the responses of nine of the initial respondents in an attempt to determine current status as to the concept and to investigate further nuances that drive their success.

Keywords

Intrapreneruship, Intrapreneurial Programs, Corporate Performances
User
Notifications

  • Anthony, P. (1991), Link HR to Corporate Strategy, Personnel Journal 70(4): 75-86.

  • Backman, J. (1983), Entrepreneurship and the Outlook for America, pp. 8, 243, The Free Press, New York.

  • Balkin, D. B. and Logan, J. W. (1988), Reward Policies that Support Entrepreneurship, Compensation and Benefit Review 20: 18-25.

  • Bird, C. (1996), Community, Population, and Organization Efforts on Innovation: A Multi-level Perspective, Academy of Management Journal 39: 1065-1084.

  • Brazeal, D. W. and Weaver, K. M. (1990), Differential Motivating Factors and Traditional Managers?: A Look at the Influence of Reward Systems and Structures on Performance among Intrapreneurial and Traditional Managers, Journal of Creative Behavior 24(4): 263-275.

  • Burgelman, R. (1984), Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship, California Management Review 26: 21-42.

  • Chisoholm, T. A. (1987), Intrapreneurship and Bureaucracy, SAM Advanced Management Journal 52: 36-40.

  • Cole, A. H. (1959), Business Enterprise in Its Social Setting, pp. 124, 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Collins, S. (1981), Incentive Programs: Pros and Cons, Personnel Journal 60: 571-575.

  • Cross, K. F. and Lynch, R. L. (1992), For Good Measure, CMA Magazine 66(3): 20-23.

  • Gunn, E. P. (1998), Smart Managing/Special on Careers: Is it Time to Bail from Big Company Life, Fortune 137: 217-218.

  • Hirsch, R. and Brush, C. (1984), The Women Entrepreneur: Management Skills and Business Problems, Journal of Small Business Management 10-12.

  • Howell, J. M. and Higgins, C.A. (1990), Champions of Technological Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2): 317- 341.

  • Jones, G. R. and Butler, J. E. (1992), Managing: Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Agency Theory Perspective, Journal of Management 18(4): 733-749.

  • Kilmann, R. H., ed., Saxton, M. J., Serpa, R. & Associates (1985), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

  • Kintzer, F. C. (1996), Entrepreneurship in Higher Education: A Critical Balance, ED 401960, 17.

  • Knight, R. M. (1985), Corporate Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Canada, Business Horizons 83: 85.

  • Macmillan, I.C. (1986), Corporate Venturing: Alternatives, Obstacles Encountered, and Experience Effects, Journal of Business Venturing 1: 177-191.

  • Marcus, M. (1994), An Investigation of the Impact of Intrapreneurial Programs within Fortune 500 Companies on Relevant Financial Indicators (Dissertation), Clemson University.

  • Ramanujam, V. and Venkatraman, N. (1988), Excellence, Planning, and Performance, Interfaces 18: 23-31.

  • Sarbough -Thompson, M. (1998), Change from Below: Integrating Bottom-up Entrepreneurship into a Program Development Framework, American Review of Public Administration 28(1): 3-26.

  • Sathe, V. (1985), Managing an entrepreneurial dilemma: Nurturing entrepreneurship and control in large corporations, pp. 636- 657, Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Center for Entrepreneurial Studies.

  • Souder, W. (1981), Encouraging Entrepreneurship in Large Corporations, Research Management 24: 18-22.

  • Standard Industrial Classification Manual (1987/1992), Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Sturdivant, F. et al. (1985), Managers Conservatism and Corporate Performance, Strategic Management Journal 6: 17-38.


Abstract Views: 506

PDF Views: 1




  • A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Intrapreneurial Programs in fortune 500 Firms

Abstract Views: 506  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Melissa H Marcus
Employee Development, Relations, and Assistance Programs, Clemson University Perimeter Road, Clemson South Carolina 29634–5337
Thomas W. Zimmerer
School of Business Saint Leo University Saint Leo, FL 33574

Abstract


The global impact of intrapreneurship has become more evident in major corporations both nationally and internationally and while much research effort has focused on the entrepreneur, the concept of taking the idea into the corporate arena requires not only differing terminology, but also a completely different set of standards (Sarbough-Thompson, 1998; Macmillian, 1986). Eight years ago the researchers investigated the impact of intrapreneurship and related programs within Fortune 500 corporations. The purpose of this study is to provide a longitudinal investigation as to the continued impact of intrapreneurial activity within the specified corporations. This research initiative includes the responses of nine of the initial respondents in an attempt to determine current status as to the concept and to investigate further nuances that drive their success.

Keywords


Intrapreneruship, Intrapreneurial Programs, Corporate Performances

References