Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Trust in the Workplace


Affiliations
1 Newcastle Graduate School of Business University of Newcastle Newcastle, NSW 2300
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper reports on the findings of a study on trust in the workplace. The study was undertaken within a large local government organisation early in 2001. While the authors recognise that it may be foolish to believe that any organisation can enjoy complete trust amongst its workforce, this paper argues that the presence of certain interpersonal and organisational characteristics results in greater levels of trust, even within the context of organisational constraints. In this case these characteristics involved perceptions of support at the interpersonal and organisational level.

Keywords

Grounded Theory, Interpersonal and Organizational Support
User
Notifications

  • Clark, M. C., and Payne, R. L. (1997), The Nature and Structure of Workers’ Trust in Management, Journal of Organizational Behavior 18: 205-224.
  • Cook, J., and Wall, T. (1980), New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Nonfulfillment, Journal of Occupational Psychology 53: 39-52.
  • Dasgupta, P. (1988), Trust as a Commodity, in Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 49-72, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
  • Davis, T. and Landa, M. (1999), The Trust Deficit, Management Accounting 71(10): 12-16.
  • Fairholm, G.W. (1994), Leadership and the Culture of Trust, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.
  • Folger, R. and Greenberg, J. (1985), Procedural Justice: An Interpretative Analysis of Personnel Systems, in K. M. Rowland and
  • G. R. Ferris (Eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol 3, pp. 141-183, JAI Press, Greenwich.
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
  • Harari, Oren (1999), The Trust Factor, Management Review 42(1): 28-37.
  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995), Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics, Academy of Management Review 20: 379-403.
  • Kramer, R. M. (1999), Trust and Distrust: Emerging Questions, Enduring Questions, Annual Review of Psychology 50: 569-598.
  • Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. (Eds.). (1996), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, London.
  • Lewis, D. and A. Weigert (1985), Social Atomism, Holism and Trust, Sociological Quarterly 26: 455-471.
  • McCune, J. (1998), That Elusive Thing Called Trust, Management Review 87 (7): 10-14.
  • Mayer, R. C. and Davis, J. H. (1999), The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasiexperiment, Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 123-136.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995), An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review 20: 709-734.
  • Mishra, A. K. (1996), Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust, in R. Kramer and T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 261-287, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Pidgeon, N. (1996), Grounded Theory: Theoretical Background, in J.T.E. Richardson, (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences, pp. 86-101, The British Psychological Society, Leicester.
  • Provis, C. (2000), Why is Trust Important?, in J. Connell and R. Zeffane (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Newcastle Conference 'Trust in the Workplace – Beyond the Quick Fix, pp. 103 The University of Newcastle, Newcastle.
  • Rotter, J.B. (1967), A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust, Journal of Personality 35: 651-655.
  • Shaw, R. B. (1997), Trust in the Balance: Building Successful Organizations on Results, Integrity and Concern, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
  • Strauss, A & Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures and Technique, California: Sage Publications.
  • Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1996), Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Influence of Motive Attributions on Willingness to Accept Decisions, in R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Whitney, John O. (1994), The Trust Factor: Liberating Profits and Restoring Corporate Vitality, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Wood, J; Wallace, J; Zeffane, R; Schermerhorn, J.R; Hunt, J. G; and Osborn, R.N. (2001), Organisational Behaviour: A Global Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Brisbane.

Abstract Views: 465

PDF Views: 1




  • Trust in the Workplace

Abstract Views: 465  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Julia Connell
Newcastle Graduate School of Business University of Newcastle Newcastle, NSW 2300
Natalie Ferres
Newcastle Graduate School of Business University of Newcastle Newcastle, NSW 2300
Tony Travaglione
Newcastle Graduate School of Business University of Newcastle Newcastle, NSW 2300

Abstract


This paper reports on the findings of a study on trust in the workplace. The study was undertaken within a large local government organisation early in 2001. While the authors recognise that it may be foolish to believe that any organisation can enjoy complete trust amongst its workforce, this paper argues that the presence of certain interpersonal and organisational characteristics results in greater levels of trust, even within the context of organisational constraints. In this case these characteristics involved perceptions of support at the interpersonal and organisational level.

Keywords


Grounded Theory, Interpersonal and Organizational Support

References