Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employee Engagement


Affiliations
1 University School of Management Studies Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University New Delhi 110078
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of the present study is to explore the relationship between personality and employee engagement amongst frontline personnel in the organized retail industry in India. In particular, the study seeks to examine the relationship between two personality traits, extraversion and conscientiousness with engagement amongst frontline employees. The Utrecht work engagement scale (2003) and Big Five Personality scale (McCrae and Costa, 1989) have been used for this purpose. Primary data was collected from 333 frontline employees working in different retail formats. The study finds that there is considerable scope for improvement in the level of employee engagement amongst the frontline personnel in the organized retail industry. There, however does exist a positive relationship between the extraversion and conscientiousness personality traits and employee engagement. Based on the findings, the paper recommends measures for improving employee engagement levels through a better fit between employee personality and the retail work environment.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, Big Five Personality Traits, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Retail Industry, India
User
Notifications

  • Auh, S., Menguc, B., Fisher, M. and Haddad, A. (2011), The Contingency Effect of Service Employee Personalities on Service Climate: Getting Employee Perceptions Aligned can Reduce Personality Effects, Journal of Service Research, 14(4): 426.

  • Bakker, A. B. (2010), Engagement and “Job Crafting”: Engaged Employees Create their Own Great Place to Work, in Albrecht, S. L. (Ed), Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice, pp. 229–244.

  • Barrick, M. and Mount, M. (1991), The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis, Personnel Psychology, 44(1): 1–26.

  • Barrick, M. R. and Mount, M. K. (1993), Autonomy as a Moderator of the Relationships Between The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 111–118.

  • Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C. and Wayne, S. J. (2006), A Longitudinal Study of the Moderating Role of Extraversion: Leader-member Exchange, Performance, and Turnover during New Executive Development, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2): 298–310.

  • Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. (2003), Core Self-evaluations: A Review of The Trait and its Role in Job Satisfaction and Job Performance, European Journal of Personality, 17: S5–S18.

  • Costa, P. T. and Mccrae, R. R. (1980), Influence of Extroversion and Neuroticism on Subjective Well-being: Happy and Unhappy People, Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 38(4): 668–678.

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. and Mccrae, R. R. (1988), Personality in Adulthood: A Six-year Longitudinal Study of Self-reports and Spouse Ratings on the Neo Personality Inventory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 853–863.

  • Costa, P. and Mccrae, R. (1992), NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.

  • Demerouti, E. and Bakker, A. B. (2011), The Job Demands–resources Model: Challenges for Future Research, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37: 1–9.

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. and Smith, H. L. (1999), Subjective Well-being: Three Decades of Progress, Psychological Bulletin, 125(2): 276–302.

  • Diener, E. and Seligman, M. E. P. (2002), Very Happy People, Psychological Science, 13(1): 81–84.

  • Digman, J. M. (1990), Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-factor Model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 417–40.

  • Stewart, G. L. and Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2006), Adaptation and Intra-individual Variation in Sales Outcomes: Exploring the Interactive Effects of Personality and Environmental Opportunity, Personnel Psychology, 59(2): 307–332.

  • Hackman, J. and Oldham, G. (1975), Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2): 159–170.

  • Hallberg, U. E. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2006), “Same Same” But Different? Can Work Engagement be Discriminated from Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment? European Psychologist, 11: 119–127.

  • Hallberg, U. E., Johansson, G. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2007), Type A Behavior and Work Situation: Associations with Burnout and Work Engagement, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(2): 135–142.

  • Halbesleben, J. R., Harvey, J. and Bolino, M. C. (2009), Too Engaged? A Conservation of Resources View of the Relationship between Work Engagement and Work Interference with Family, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6): 1452–65.

  • Hattrup, K. and Jackson, S. E. (1996), Learning about Individual Differences by Taking Situations Seriously, in Murphy, K. R. (Ed), Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations, pp.507-547, Jossey-bass, San Francisco.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989), Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress, American Psychology, 44: 513–524.

  • Ilies, R., Scott, B. A. and Judge, T. A. (2006), The Interactive Effects of Personal Traits and Experienced States on Intraindividual Patterns of Citizenship Behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 49: 561–575.

  • John, O. P. (1990), The “Big Five” Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in The Natural Language and in Questionnaires, in Pervin, L. A. (Ed), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, pp. 66–100, Guilford Press, New York.

  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A. and Durham, C. C. (1997), The Dispositional Causes of Job Satisfaction: A Core Evaluations Approach, in Cummings, L. L. and Slaw, B. M. (Ed), Research in Organizational Behavior, pp. 151-188, Jai Press, Greenwich, CT.

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A. and Locke, E. A. (2005), Core Self-evaluations and Job and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Self-concordance and Goal Attainment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 257–268.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990), Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work, Academy of Management,33: 692–724.

  • Kim H. J., Shin K. H. and Swanger, N. (2009), Burnout and Engagement: A Comparative Analysis Using the Big Five Personality Dimensions, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28: 96–104.

  • Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J. and Fiksenbaum, L. (2006), Work Engagement among Women Managers and Professionals in a Turkish Bank: Potential Antecedents and Consequences, Equal Opportunities International, 25: 299–310.

  • Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., Van Doornen, L. and Schaufeli, W. (2006), Burnout and Work Engagement: Do Individual Differences Make a Difference? Personality And Individual Differences, 40: 521–532.

  • Leiter, M. P. and Maslach, C. (1999), Six Areas of Worklife: A Model of The Organizational Context of Burnout, Journal of Health And Human Services Administration, 21: 472–489.

  • Lopez, S. J., Snyder, C. R. and Rasmussen, H. N. (2006), Striking a Vital Balance: Developing a Complementary Focus on Human Weakness and Strength through Positive Psychological Assessment, in Lopez, Shane J. and Snyder, C. R. (Eds), Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models And Measures, pp. 3–20, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.

  • Lush, R. and Serpkenci, R. (1990), Personal Differences, Job Tension, Job Outcomes, and Store Performance: A Study of Retail Store Managers, Journal of Marketing, 54(10): 85–101.

  • Matamala, A. C., Pace, V. L. and Thometz, H. (2010), Work Engagement as a Mediator Between Personality and Citizenship Behavior, Interactive Poster Session at The 25th Annual Conference of The Society for Industrial And Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.

  • Maslach, C. and Leiter, M. P. (1997), The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What To Do about It, Jossey-bass, San Francisco, CA.

  • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U. and Ruokolainen, M. (2007), Job Demands and Resources as Antecedents of Work Engagement: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70: 149–171.

  • Mccrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1984), Emerging Lives, Enduring Positions: Personality in Adulthood, Little, Brown, Boston.

  • Mccrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1989), Reinterpreting The Myers – Briggs Type Indicator from the Perspective of Five-Factor Model of Personality, Journal of Personality, 57: 17–40.

  • Mccrae, R. R. and John, O. P. (1992), An Introduction to the Five Factor Model and its Applications, Journal of Personality, 61:175–215.

  • Mccrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebickova, M. and Avia, M. D. (2000), Nature Over Nurture: Temperament, Personality, And Life Span Development, Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 78(1): 173–186.

  • Morrison, K. A. (1996), An Empirical Test of a Model of Franchisee Job Satisfaction, Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3): 27–41.

  • Peeters, M. A., Rutte, C. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. and Reymen, I. M. (2006), The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Satisfaction with the Team, Small Group Research, 37: 187–211.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006), Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21: 600–619.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-roma, V. and Bakker, A. B. (2002), The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Confirmative Analytic Approach, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: 71–92.

  • Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. B. (2003), Uwes–Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test Manual, Utrecht University, Department of Psychology (http://www.schaufeli.com).

  • Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. B. (2004), Job Demands, Job Resources, and their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement: A Multi-sample Study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 293–315.

  • Specht, N., Fichtel, S. and Meyer, A. (2007), Perception and Attribution of Employees’ Effort and Abilities: The Impact on Customer Encounter Satisfaction, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(5): 534–554.

  • Tellegen, A. (1985), Structures of Mood and Personality and their Relevance to Assessing Anxiety, With an Emphasis on Self-report, in Tuma, A. H. and Maser, J. D. (Eds), Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders, pp. 681–706.

  • Totterdell, P., Wood, S. and Wall, T. (2006), An Intra-individual Test of the Demands-control Model: A Weekly Diary of Psychological Strain in Portfolio Workers, Journal of Occupational And Organization Psychology, 79: 63–84.

  • Van Den Berg, P. T. and Feiz, J. A. (2003), Complex Relationships among Personality Traits, Job Characteristics, and Work Behaviors, International Journal of Assessment And Selection, 11: 326–339.

  • Wefald, A. J. and Downey, R. G. (2009), Construct Dimensionality of Engagement and its Relation with Satisfaction, The Journal of Psychology, 143: 91–111.

  • Wilson, G. D. (1981), Personality and Social Behaviour, in Eysenck, H. J. (Ed), A Model for Personality, Springer, Berlin.


Abstract Views: 1738

PDF Views: 4




  • Employee Engagement

Abstract Views: 1738  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Meenakshi Handa
University School of Management Studies Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University New Delhi 110078
Aastha Gulati
University School of Management Studies Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University New Delhi 110078

Abstract


The purpose of the present study is to explore the relationship between personality and employee engagement amongst frontline personnel in the organized retail industry in India. In particular, the study seeks to examine the relationship between two personality traits, extraversion and conscientiousness with engagement amongst frontline employees. The Utrecht work engagement scale (2003) and Big Five Personality scale (McCrae and Costa, 1989) have been used for this purpose. Primary data was collected from 333 frontline employees working in different retail formats. The study finds that there is considerable scope for improvement in the level of employee engagement amongst the frontline personnel in the organized retail industry. There, however does exist a positive relationship between the extraversion and conscientiousness personality traits and employee engagement. Based on the findings, the paper recommends measures for improving employee engagement levels through a better fit between employee personality and the retail work environment.

Keywords


Employee Engagement, Big Five Personality Traits, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Retail Industry, India

References