Open Access
Subscription Access
Providing Website Security by using Pattern Classifiers
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Examination on security assessment of example classifiers enduring an onslaught portrays design characterization frameworks that are security assessment issues due to various assaults. Example Classification usually utilized in antagonistic applications, as biometric validation, organize interruption identification, and spam separating. In these applications’ information can be deliberately controlled by people to undermine their activity. This antagonistic situation’s misuse may in some cases influence their presentation, frameworks may show vulnerabilities and farthest point their reasonable utility. This antagonistic situation isn’t considered by old style plan strategies. These Applications have an inborn antagonistic nature since the info information can be deliberately controlled by a clever and versatile foe to undermine classifier activity. This frequently offers ascend to a weapons contest between the enemy and the classifier architect. The framework assesses at configuration stage the security of example classifiers, to be specific, the presentation corruption under potential assaults they may bring about during activity. A sum up structure is utilized for assessment of classifier security that formalizes and sums up the preparation and testing datasets, to segregate between a “real” and a “pernicious” design class Training and Testing sets have been gotten from circulation utilizing an old-style reassembling strategy like bootstrapping or cross approval. Security assessment can be done by averaging the presentation of the prepared and tried information.
Keywords
Antagonistic, Bootstrapping, Classifiers, Pernicious, Security.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- R. N. Rodrigues, L. L. Ling, and V. Govindaraju, “Robustness of multimodal biometric fusion methods against spoof attacks,” Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 169-179, 2009.
- P. Johnson, B. Tan, and S. Schuckers, “Multimodal fusion vulnerability to non-zero effort (spoof) imposters,” in 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, pp. 1-5, 2010.
- P. Fogla, M. Sharif, R. Perdisci, O. Kolesnikov, and W. Lee, “Polymorphic blending attacks,” in Proc. 15th Conf. USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX-SS’06), USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006, p. 17.
- D. Lowd, and C. Meek, “Good word attacks on statistical spam filters,” in 2nd Conf. Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS’05), Stanford University, CA, USA, 2005.
- A. Kolcz, and C. H. Teo, “Feature weighting for improved classifier robustness,” in 6th Conf. Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS’09), Mountain View, CA, USA, 2009.
- D. Fetterly, “Adversarial information retrieval: The manipulation of web content,” ACM Computing Reviews, 2007.
Abstract Views: 263
PDF Views: 88